This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
His norms are: “1. We commit ourselves to our claims and to their logical entailments Our claims and their entailments become our commitments [199]. … 2. When we make a claim, we imply that we are entitled to that claim. To be entitled to a claim is to have good reasons and evidence for it [199]. … 3. We should try to support our claims with reasons and evidence that are maximally accessible to others [200]. … 4. We invite criticism and challenges to our own claims, and when our claims are appropriately challenged, we are obliged to justify them with reasons and evidence [202]. …5. We are entitled to treat our commitments as rationally innocent until proven guilty [204]. … 6. We should withdraw from commitments to which we are not rationally entitled [205].”
William Hasker, Metaphysics and the Tri-Personal God (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).
Wood distinguishes methodological naturalism from ontological naturalism, which holds that “there are no nonnatural entities, experiences, or causes” (219).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knight, J. Analytic Theology and the academic study of Religion, by William Wood. Oxford University Press, 2021. 299 pages, $100.00 (hb). Int J Philos Relig 92, 115–119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-022-09847-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-022-09847-w