Abstract
During the last few years two major volumes have been published, both greatly revised versions of earlier Gifford Lectures: Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age (2007) and Raimon Panikkar’s The Rhythm of Being (2010). The two volumes are similar in some respects and very dissimilar in others. Both thinkers complain about the glaring blemishes of the modern, especially the contemporary age; both deplore above all a certain deficit of religiosity. The two authors differ, however, both in the details of their diagnosis and in their proposed remedies. Taylor views the modern age—styled as “secular age”—as marked by a slide into secular agnosticism, into “exclusive humanism”, and above all into an “immanent frame” excluding theistic “transcendence”. Although sharing the concern about “loss of meaning”, Panikkar does not find its source in the abandonment of (mono)theistic transcendence; on the contrary, both radical transcendence and agnostic immanence are responsible for the deficit of genuine faith. For him, recovery of faith requires an acknowledgment of our being in the world, as part of the “rhythm of being” happening in a holistic or “cosmotheandric” mode. In classical Indian terminology, while Taylor’s emphasis on the transcendence-immanence tension reflects ultimately a dualistic perspective (dvaita), Panikkar’s holistic notion of the rhythm of being captures the core of Advaita Vendanta.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dallmayr, F. (2002). Dialogue among civilizations: Some exemplary voices (pp. 185–200). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dallmayr F. (2005) Small wonder: Global power and its discontents. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD
Dallmayr, F. (2010). Integral pluralism: Beyond culture wars (pp. 45–66). Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
Guardini, R. (1950/1956). Das Ende der Neuzeit [The end of the modern world]. New York: Sheed & Ward.
Guénon, R. (1928/1962). La crise du monde moderne [The crisis of the modern world] (M. Pallis & R. Nicholson, Trans.). London: Luzac.
Heidegger, M. (1968). What calls for thinking? (F. D. Wieck & J. G. Gray, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger M. (1977) Letter on humanism. In: Krell D. F. (eds) Martin Heidegger: Basic writings. Harper & Row, New York, pp 189–242
Hölderlin, F. (1966). Poems and fragments (M. Hamburger, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Maritain, J. (1973). Integral humanism: Temporal and spiritual problems of a new Christendom (J. W. Evans, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Cezanne’s doubt. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. A. Dreyfus (Trans.), Sense and non-sense. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible, followed by working notes (C. Lefort, Ed., & A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Panikkar R. (1973) Worship and secular man. Maryknoll, NY, Orbis Books
Panikkar R. (2010) The rhythm of being: The Gifford lectures. Maryknoll, NY, Orbis Books
Roy A. (1997) The god of small things. Random House, New York
Spengler, O. (1918/1939). The decline of the west. New York: Knopf.
Strauss L. (1964) The crisis of our time. In: Spaeth H. J. (eds) The predicament of modern politics. University of Destroit Press, Detroit, MI
Taylor C. (1989) Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Taylor C. (1992) The ethics of authenticity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Taylor, C. (1999). In J. L. Heft (Ed.), A catholic modernity? New York: Oxford University Press.
Taylor C. (2007) A secular age. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 2–3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dallmayr, F. A secular age? Reflections on Taylor and Panikkar. Int J Philos Relig 71, 189–204 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9340-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9340-y