Abstract
Most modern writers accept that a privation theory of evil should explicitly account for the evil of pain. But pains are quintessentially real. The evil of pain does not seem to lie in an absence of good. Though many directly take on the challenges this raises, the metaphysics and axiology of their answers is often obscure. In this paper I try to straighten things out. By clarifying and categorizing the possible types of privation views, I explore the ways in which privationists about evil are—or should or could be—privationists about pain’s evil.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahern M.B. (1965) A note on the nature of evil. Sophia, 4: 17–25
Ahern M.B. (1966) The nature of evil. Sophia, 5: 35–44
Ahern M.B. (1971) The problem of evil. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Anglin B., Goetz S. (1982) Evil is privation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 13: 3–12
Aquinas T. (1947) Summa theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Benziger Bros, New York
Augustine (1955) Confessions (A. C. Outler, Trans.). Westminster Press, Philadelphia
Augustine (1961). In H. Paolucci (Ed.), The enchiridion on faith, hope, and love. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company
Eddy M.B. (1971) Science and health with a key to the scriptures. First Church of Christ, Boston
Hick J. (1966) Evil and the God of love. Harper & Row, New York
Hume D. (1779) Dialogues concerning natural religion. Indianapolis, Hackett
Kane G.S. (1980) Evil and privation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 11: 43–58
McCloskey H.J. (1964) God and evil. In: Nelson P. (eds) God and evil: Readings on the theological problem of evil. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 61–68
Schilling S.P. (1977) God and human anguish. Nashville, Abingdon
Schleiermacher, F. (1928). In H. R. Mackintosh & J. S. Stewart (Eds.), The Christian faith (2nd ed., 1831). Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swenson, A. Privation theories of pain. Int J Philos Relig 66, 139–154 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-009-9202-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-009-9202-4