Abstract
I begin with the assumption that a philosophically significant tension exists today in feminist philosophy of religion between those subjects who seek to become divine and those who seek their identity in mutual recognition. My critical engagement with the ambiguous assertions of Luce Irigaray seeks to demonstrate, on the one hand, that a woman needs to recognize her own identity but, on the other hand, that each subject whether male or female must struggle in relation to the other in order to maintain realism about life and death. No one can avoid the recognition that we are each given life but each of us also dies. In addition, I raise a more general, philosophical problem for analytic philosophers who attempt to read Continental philosophy of religion: how should philosophers interpret deliberately ambiguous assertions? For example, what does Irigaray mean in asserting, ‘Divinity is what we need to become free, autonomous, sovereign’? To find an answer, I turn to the distinctively French readings of the Hegelian struggle for recognition which have preoccupied Continental philosophers especially since the first half of the last century. I explore the struggle for mutual recognition between women and men who must face the reality of life and death in order to avoid the projection of their fear of mortality onto the other sex. This includes a critical look at Irigaray’s account of subjectivity and divinity. I turn to the French philosopher Michèle Le Doeuff in order to shift the focus from divinity to intersubjectivity. I conclude that taking seriously the struggle for mutual recognition between subjects forces contemporary philosophers of religion to be realist in their living and dying. With this in mind, the lesson from the Continent for philosophy of religion is that we must not stop yearning for recognition. Indeed, we must even risk our autonomy/divinity in seeking to recognize intersubjectivity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson P.S. (1993). Ricoeur and kant: A philosophy of the will. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
Anderson P.S. (1998). A feminist philosophy of religion: The rationality and myths of religious belief. Oxford, Blackwell.
Anderson P.S. (2001). Gender and the infinite: On the aspiration to be all there is. International Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 50(1–3): 191–212
Anderson, P. S. (2002a). Introduction. Women’s Philosophy Review, 29(9) (Special issue on philosophy of religion).
Anderson P.S. (2002b). Ricoeur’s reclamation of autonomy: Unity, plurality and totality. In: Wall J., Schweiker W., Hall W.D. (eds), Paul Ricoeur and contemporary moral thought. Routledge, London, (pp. 15–31)
Anderson P.S. (2003). Autonomy, vulnerability and gender. Feminist Theory, 4(2):149–164
Anderson P.S. (2004). An epistemological-ethical approach to philosophy of religion: Learning to listen. In: Anderson P.S., Clack B. (eds), Feminist philosophy of religion: Critical readings. Routledge, London (pp. 87–102)
Anderson P.S. (2005). What’s wrong with the god’s eye point of view: A constructive feminist critique of the ideal observer theory. In: Harris H.A., Insole C.J. (eds), Faith and philosophical analysis, Heythrop studies in contemporary philosophy, religion and theology. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, Hants (pp. 85–99)
Anderson, P. S., Le Doeuff, M. A woman in philosophy and in dialogue. (Manuscript-in-progress, under review).
Anderson, P. S. Unselfing in love: A contradiction in terms. In: H. Vroom, W. Stoker & J. Schrijvers (Eds.), Faith in the Enlightenment. Currents of Encounter Series The Netherlands, forthcoming.
Anderson, P. S. A woman in philosophy. In: M. Le Doeuff (Eds.), A woman in philosophy and in dialogue.
Bauer N. (2001). Simone de Beauvoir, Philosophy, & Feminism. Columbia University Press, New York
Burke C., Schor N., Whitford M. (eds), (1994). Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist philosophy and modern European thought. Columbia University Press, New York
Butler J. (1987). Subjects of desire: Hegelian reflections in twentieth-century France. Columbia University Press, New York
Butler J. (2000). Antigone’s claim: Kinship between life and death. Columbia University Press, New York
Butler J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge, New York/London
Butler, J. (2005). On being beside oneself: On the limits of sexual autonomy. In: Undoing gender (chapter 1); Reprinted in: N. Bamforth (Ed.), Sex rights: The Oxford amnesty lectures 2002 (pp. 48–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Camus A. (1971). The Rebel. Penguin, Harmondsworth (Translanted by A. Bower).
Canters H., Jantzen G.M. (2005). Forever fluid: A reading of Luce Irigaray’s elemental passions. Manchester University Press, Manchester
De Beauvoir S. (1948). The ethics of ambiguity. Philosophical Library, New York. (Translated by B. Frechtman).
De Beauvoir S. (1989). The second sex. Vintage Books, New York. A Division of Random House (Translated and edited by H. M. Parshley, Introduction to the vintage edition by Deirdre Bair).
Feuerbach L. (1957). The essence of christianity (1841). Harper, New York (Translated by G. Eliot).
Gheaus, A. (2005, submitted) Care and justice: Why they cannot go together all the way. PhD Thesis, University of Central Europe, Budapest, Hungary.
Grosz E. (1993). Irigaray and the divine. In: Maggie Kim C.W., St Ville S.M., Simonaitis S.M. (eds) Transfigurations: Theology and the French feminists. Augsburg Fortress Press, Minneapolis, MN (pp. 199–214)
Hegel G.W.F. (1977). The phenomenology of spirit. Oxford University Press, Oxford (Translated by A. V. Miller).
Hegel G.W.F. (1991). Elements for the philosophy of right. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (pp. 268–276) (Translated by H. B. Nisbet).
Hollywood A. (2002). Sensible ecstasy: mysticism, sexual difference and the demands of history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
hooks b. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender and cultural politics. South Bend Press, Boston
Irigaray L. (1982). Passions élémentaires. Editions Minuit, Paris; Translated by Collie, J. & Still, J. (1992). Elemental passions. London: The Athlone Press.
Irigaray, L. (1985). La Mystérique. In: Speculum of the other woman (pp. 191–202). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Translated by G. C. Gill); Also reprinted La Mystérique. In: M. Joy, K. O’Grady & J. L. Poxon (Eds.), French feminists on religion: A reader (pp. 28–39).
Irigaray, L. (1993). Divine women. In: Sexes and genealogies. (pp. 55–72). New York: Columbia University Press (Translated by G. C. Gill).
Jankélévitch V. (1981) Le Paradoxe de la morale. Le Seuil, Paris
Jankélévitch V. (2005). Forgiveness. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (Translated by A. Kelley).
Jantzen G.M. (1998). Becoming divine: Towards a feminist philosophy of religion. University of Manchester Press, Manchester
Joy M., O’Grady K., Poxon J.L. (eds) (2002). French feminists on religion: A reader. Routledge, London
Keller M.L. (2003). Divine women and the Nehanda Mhondoro: Strengths and limitations of the sensible transcendental in a post-colonial world of religious women. In: Joy, O’Grady, Pozon (eds) Religion in French feminist thought. Routledge, London and New York (pp. 68–82)
Kristeva J. (1987). In the beginning was love: Psychoanalysis and faith. Columbia University Press, New York Translated by A. Goldhammer, Introduction by O. F. Kernberg).
Langer M. (2003). Beauvoir and Merleau-Ponty on Ambiguity. In: Card C. (ed) The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir (chapter 4). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Le Doeuff M. (1991). Hipparchia’s choice: An essay concerning women philosophy, etc. Blackwell, Oxford (pp. 128–133, 243) (Translated by T. Selous).
Le Doeuff M. (2003). The sex of knowing. Routledge, London (Translated by K. Hamer & L Code).
Le Doeuff M. (2004). Towards a friendly transaltantic critique of the second sex. In: Grosholz E.R. (ed) The legacy of Simone De Beauvoir. Oxford University Press, Oxford (pp. 22–36).
Le Doeuff, M. (2005). Women in dialogue and in solitude. 2004 Cassal lecture, University of London, 24 May 2004; published in The Journal of Romance Studies. 5(2) Summer.
Lear J. (2005). Freud. Routledge, London
Levinas, E. (1992). The ambiguity of love. In: Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. (Translated by Alphonso Lingis).
Mahmood S. (2005). Politics of piety: The islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Miller D. (1991). Liberty. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Moore A.W. (2003). Noble in reason, infinite in faculty: Themes and variations on Kant’s moral and religious philosophy. Routledge, London
Moore A.W. (1997). Points of view. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Murdoch I. (1970). The sovereignty of good over other concepts, in her the sovereignty of good. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Pozon J.L. (2003). Corporeality and divinity: Irigaray and the problem of the ideal. In: Joy M., O’Grady K., Poxon J.L. (eds) Religion in French feminist thought: Critical perspectives. Routledge, London and New York (pp. 41–50)
Ricoeur P. (1967). The symbolism of evil. Harper & Row, New York/London (Translated by E. Buchanan).
Rose G. (1995). Love’s work. Chatto & Windus Limited, London
Rose G. (1997). Mourning becomes the law: Philosophy and representation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Roth M.S. (1988). Knowing and history: Appropriations of Hegel in twentieth-century France. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
Sartre J.-P. (1996) Being and nothingness. Pocket Books, New York (Translated by H. Barnes).
Sartre J.-P. (1989). No exit and other plays. Vintage, New York
Schott R.M. (2003). Beauvoir on the ambiguity of evil. In: Card C. (ed) The Cambridge companion to Simone De Beauvoir (Chapter 11). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Williams R.R. (1997). Hegel’s ethics of recognition. California University Press, Berkeley, CA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, P.S. Life, death and (inter)subjectivity: realism and recognition in continental feminism. Int J Philos Relig 60, 41–59 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-0013-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-0013-6