Skip to main content
Log in

Must All be Saved? A Kierkegaardian Response to Theological Universalism

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

That God could create beings free over against himself is the cross which philosophy could not bear but upon which it has remained hanging. – Kierkegaard

Abstract

In this paper, I consider how a Kierkegaardian could respond critically to the question of strong theological universalism, i.e., the belief that all individuals must eventually be reconciled to God and experience everlasting happiness. A Kierkegaardian would likely reject what Thomas Talbott has called “conservative theism,” but has the resources to mount a sustained attack on the view that all individuals must experience everlasting happiness. Some have seen that Kierkegaard has some potential in this regard, but a full Kierkegaardian response to strong theological universalism has yet to be given. In this paper, I give such an account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Mulder Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulder, J. Must All be Saved? A Kierkegaardian Response to Theological Universalism. Int J Philos Relig 59, 1–24 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-005-2532-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-005-2532-y

Keywords

Navigation