Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Alcohol control and foster care

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parental alcohol consumption is often associated with an increased likelihood of child abuse. As consumption is related to price, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the propensity for increases in the full price of alcohol to influence entry rates and the length of time spent in foster care. Using alcoholic beverage prices and a measure of availability in combination with data on foster care cases, we find that higher alcohol prices are not effective in reducing foster care entry rates; however, once in foster care, the duration of stay may be shortened by higher prices and reduced availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The liquor price series collection by ACCRA ends in 2004. Also, the variation in alcohol taxes (which is a source of variation for price) is limited after this date. For example, no state changed its beer tax change between 2004 and 2008.

  2. The percent of a state’s population living in dry counties is another potential availability measure. This variable was tested in the models but suffers from limited variation during our sample period and is therefore is not included. However, results suggest that areas with larger populations in dry areas have lower foster care entry rates. These are available upon request.

  3. The ten states are Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. Maine has missing alcohol prices in all years and is excluded from the analyses.

References

  • Anderson, D. M., Hansen. B., & Rees, D. I. (in press). Medical marijuana laws, traffic fatalities, and alcohol consumption. Journal of Law and Economics.

  • Bergman, U. M., & Hansen, N. L. (2010). Are excise taxes on beverages fully passed through to prices? The Danish evidence. Working Paper, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Sendhil, M. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using stata. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L., & Williams, J. (2001). Cannabis, alcohol and cigarettes: substitutes or complements? Economic Record, 77(236), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C., & Dobkin, C. (2011). Alcohol regulation and crime. In P. J. Cookm, J. Ludwig, & J. McCrary (Eds.), Controlling crime: Strategies and tradeoffs (pp. 291–329). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (1999). No safe haven: Children of substance-abusing parents. New York: Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (2001). Shoveling up: The impact of substance abuse on state budgets. New York: Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (2009). Shoveling up II: The impact of substance abuse on federal, state and local budgets. New York: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, H., Harrison, P., & Kassler, W. J. (2000). Sex under the influence: The effect of alcohol policy on sexually transmitted disease rates in the U.S. Journal of Law and Economics, 43(1), 215–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Children of Alcoholics Foundation. (1996). Helping children affected by parental addiction and family violence: Collaboration, coordination, and cooperation. New York: Children of Alcoholics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. J., & Moore, M. J. (1993). Economic perspectives on reducing alcohol-related violence. In S. E. Martin (Ed.), Alcohol and interpersonal violence: Fostering multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 193–211), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Research Monograph 24. NIH Publication No. 93–3469. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Crost, B., & Guerrero, S. (2012). The effect of alcohol availability on marijuana use: Evidence from the minimum legal drinking age. Journal of Health Economics, 31(1), 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crost, B., & Rees, D. I. (2013). The minimum legal drinking age and marijuana use: New estimates from the NLSY97. Journal of Health Economics, 32(2), 474–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBellis, M. D., Broussard, E. R., Herring, D. J., Wexler, S., Moritz, G., & Benitez, J. G. (2001). Psychiatric co-morbidity in caregivers and children involved in maltreatment: A pilot research study with policy implications. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25(7), 923–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. D. (2001). Does setting limits save lives? The case of 0.08 BAC laws. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(1), 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Famularo, R. K. S., Barnum, R., & Wharton, R. (1986). Alcoholism and severe child maltreatment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56(3), 481–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, L. (2002). Maltreatment reports and placement outcomes for infants and toddlers in out-of-home care. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23(5), 517–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, L., Berrick, J. D., & Brodowski, M. L. (2000). Understanding reentry to out-of-home care for reunified infants. Child Welfare, 79(4), 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freisthler, B. (2004). A spatial analysis of social disorganization, alcohol access, and rates of child maltreatment in neighborhoods. Children & Youth Services Review, 26(9), 803–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freisthler, B., Needell, B., & Gruenwald, P. J. (2005). Is the physical availability of alcohol and illicit drugs related to neighborhood rates of child maltreatment? Child Abuse and Neglect, 29(9), 1049–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M. (2005). Individual behaviors and substance use: The role of price. In B. Lindgren, & M. Grossman (Ed.) Substance use: Individual behavior, social interaction, markets and politics, Volume 16 of Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, 15–39. Amsterdam: JAI, an imprint of Elsevier Ltd.

  • Kelleher, K. M., Chaffin, J., Hollenberg, J., & Fisher, E. (1994). Alcohol and drug disorders among physically abusive and neglectful parents in a community-based sample. American Journal of Public Health, 84(10), 1586–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, D. S. (2005). Are alcohol tax hikes fully passed through to prices? Evidence from Alaska. American Economic Review, 95, 273–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malm, K., Vandivere, S., & McKlindon, A. (2011). Children adopted from foster care: Child and family characteristics, adoption motivation, and well-being. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. G., Blumberg, L., & Moulton, L. H. (1995). The demand for alcohol: The differential response to price. Journal of Health Economics, 14(2), 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, S., Chatterji, P., & Kaestner, R. (2003). Estimating the impact of alcohol policies on youth suicide. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 6(1), 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, S., & Grossman, M. (1998). Alcohol regulation and domestic violence towards children. Contemporary Economic Policy, 16(3), 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, S., & Grossman, M. (2000). The effects of beer taxes on physical child abuse. Journal of Health Economics, 19(2), 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, S., Grossman, M., & Conrad, R. (2010). Alcohol policies and child maltreatment. In D. Slottje & R. Tchernis (Eds.), Contributions to economic analysis (Vol. 290, pp. 17–35)., Current issues in health economics England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect. (2002). Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) User’s Guide and Codebook for Fiscal Year 2000 to Present. Ithaca, NY: Family Life Development Center, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. P. (2008). How similar are youth and adult alcohol behaviors? Panel results for excise taxes and outlet density. Atlantic Economic Journal, 36, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2003). The NHSDA Report, Children Living with Substance-Abusing or Substance-Dependent Parents. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttler, L. I., Zucker, R. A., Fitzgerald, H. E., & Bingham, C. R. (1998). Behavioral outcomes among COAs during the early and middle childhood years: Familial subtype variations. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 22(9), 1962–1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhm, C. J., Jones, A. S., Kerr, W. C., et al. (2012). What U.S. data should be used to measure the price elasticity of demand for alcohol? Journal of Health Economics, 31(6), 851–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffer, H., & Chaloupka, F. (1998). Demographic differentials in the demand for alcohol and illicit drugs. Working Paper No. 6432, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., NBER.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (1999). Blending perspectives and building common ground. A report to congress on substance abuse and child protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau. (1998). Child Maltreatment 1996: Reports from the States to the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yörük, B., & Yörük, C. (2011). The impact of minimum legal drinking age laws on alcohol consumption and marijuana use: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design using exact date of birth. Journal of Health Economics, 30, 740–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. J., & Bielinska-Kwapisz, A. (2002). Alcohol taxes and beverage prices. National Tax Journal, 55(1), 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. J., & Bielinska-Kwapisz, A. (2003). Alcohol consumption, beverage prices and measurement error. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(2), 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., & Harris, M. N. (2004). Demand for Marijuana, Alcohol and Tobacco: Participation, Levels of Consumption and Cross-Equation Correlations. Economic Record, 80(251), 394–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by Grant #R03AA016836 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism or the National Institutes of Health. We are grateful to two anonymous referees for their very helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Markowitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markowitz, S., Cuellar, A., Conrad, R.M. et al. Alcohol control and foster care. Rev Econ Household 12, 589–612 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9198-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9198-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation