Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does previewing answer choice options improve performance on reading tests?

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previewing answer-choice options before finishing reading the text is a widely employed test-taking behavior. In the present study we examined whether previewing is related to item response accuracy and response time, using data from Chinese learners of varying English proficiency levels and English native speakers. We examined eye movement patterns of participants who completed online multiple-choice sentence completion tasks, and how previewing was related to reading performance and whether the relation varied as a function of English proficiency level. The results showed that, relative to no previewing, previewing was associated with a significantly lower probability of answering an item correctly but not with significantly longer response time. Importantly, these relations varied across English proficiency levels such that participants with higher proficiency performed better without previewing, but there was no difference for lower-intermediate learners of English. These findings suggest that previewing does not facilitate performance on a sentence comprehension task, but instead interferes with the comprehension process, particularly for individuals with relatively high language proficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachman, L. F. (1982). The trait structure of cloze test scores. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bax, S. (2013). The cognitive processing of candidates during reading tests: Evidence from eye-tracking. Language Testing, 30, 441–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false recovery rate; a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (1995). Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there any evidence for a special relationship? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 679–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D. (2006). The coming of age of research on test-taking strategies. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman Applied Linguistics/Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D., & Upton, T. A. (2007). ‘I want to go back to the text’: Response strategies on the reading subset of the new TOEFL. Language Testing, 24, 209–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, T. (2008). Reading for different goals: The interplay of EFL college students’ multiple goals, reading strategy use and reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 224–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and unsuccessful second language learners. System, 5, 110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64, 160–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonz, J. (1990). Another turn in the conversation: What does cloze measure? TESOL Quarterly, 24, 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J., Vukovic, R. K., & Berry, D. (2013). Roles of attention shifting and inhibitory control in fourth-grade reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-S. (2015a). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: Evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86, 128–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-S. G. (2015b). Developmental, component-based model of reading fluency: An investigation of word reading fluency, text reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 459–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension or oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-S., Park, C., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). Is oral/text reading fluency a “bridge” to reading comprehension? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-S., & Wagner, R. K. (2015). Text (Oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development: An investigation of its mediating role for children from Grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 224–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-S., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2012). Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from grade 1 to grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M. L., Tsai, M. J., Yang, F. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Liu, T. C., Lee, S. W. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liontas, J. (2002). Transactional idiom analysis: Theory and practice. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1, 17–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, P. L. (1985). Rational deletion cloze and global comprehension in German. Language Learning, 35, 423–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, M. C., & Layton, K. (1990). Concurrent validity of cloze as a measure of intersentential comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 372–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K. (2005). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In M. J. Snowling and C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 248–265). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849–894). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solo (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research, 72, 675–688. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0173-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarig, G. (1987). High-level reading in the first and in the foreign language: Some comparative process data. In J. Devine, P. Carrell, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 105–120). Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T., Kamil, M. L., & Tobin, A. W. (1982). Cloze as a measure of intersentential comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 229–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. (1997). The effect of question preview in listening comprehension tests. Language Testing, 14, 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2012). Do L1 reading achievement and L1 print exposure contribute to the prediction of L2 proficiency? Language Learning, 62, 473–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, P. (1997). Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on the discourse cloze test. Language Testing, 14, 214–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilstra, J., McMaster, K., van den Broek, P., & Rapp, D. (2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchikoshi, Y. (2013). Predictors of English reading comprehension: Cantonese-speaking English language learners in the US. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 913–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2012). The simple view of second language reading throughout the primary grades. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1805–1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorstius, C., Radach, R., Mayer, M. B., & Lonigan, C. J. (2013). Monitoring local comprehension monitoring in sentence reading. School Psychology Review, 42(2), 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, C. (2004). Transfer to reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations of text and to L2 working memory. Applied Linguistics, 25, 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, J. & Shiotstu, T. (2015). Comprehension and knowledge components that predict L2 reading: A latent-trait approach. Applied Linguistics. doi:10.1093/applin/amu079.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Qian Guo, Li Yang & Lihui Liu

  2. Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, 1114 W. Call Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA

    Young-Suk Grace Kim

Authors
  1. Qian Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Young-Suk Grace Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lihui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Suk Grace Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Q., Kim, YS.G., Yang, L. et al. Does previewing answer choice options improve performance on reading tests?. Read Writ 29, 745–760 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9626-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9626-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation