Skip to main content
Log in

Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the effects of morphological awareness on five measures of reading in 103 children from Grades 1 to 3. Morphological awareness was assessed with a word analogy task that included a wide range of morphological transformations. Results indicated that the new measure had satisfactory reliability, and that morphological awareness was a significant predictor of word reading accuracy and speed, pseudoword reading accuracy, text reading speed, and reading comprehension, after controlling the effects of verbal and nonverbal ability and phonological awareness. Morphological awareness also explained variance in reading comprehension after further controlling word reading. We conclude that morphological awareness has important roles in word reading and reading comprehension, and we suggest that it should be included more frequently in assessments and instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (Serial No. 238).

  • Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, M. (1970). Inflectional performance and early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 6, 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., Stone, C. A., & Katz, L. A. (2001). The effect of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Sanchez, R. P., & Campbell, T. (1997). From beyond to within their grasp: The rudiments of analogical problem solving in 10- and 13-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33, 790–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1982). The young word maker: A case study of innovation in the child’s lexicon. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 390–425). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2008). A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexics and poor readers: A strength or weakness? In F. Manis, A. Fawcett, G. Reid, & L. Siegel (Eds.), Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 212–237). USA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., Wade-Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. R. (2009). Flexibility in young second-language learners: Examining the language specificity of orthographic processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Empirisoft Corporation. (2002). DirectRT research software (v2002). New York: Empirisoft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (1995). Transitive relational mappings in 3- and 4-year-olds: The analogy of Goldilocks and the Three Bears. Child Development, 66, 877–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, N. (2006). Children’s spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 737–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (Eds.). (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997a). Children’s understanding of the connection between grammar and spelling. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 219–240). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997b). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrila, R. K., Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Nurmi, J.-E., & Kirby, J. R. (2005). Development of individual differences in reading: Results from longitudinal studies in English and Finnish. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, J., & Deacon, H. (2008). The representation of morphologically complex words in the developing lexicon. Journal of Child Language, 35, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1965). Coloured progressive matrices test. London: Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford, England: Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L., Lai, S., White, B., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Orthographic and morphological processing as predictors of reading achievement. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Vancouver, BC.

  • Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A. E., Brady, S. A., et al. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relationship between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. C., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. W., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiederholt, J. K., & Bryant, B. R. (2001). GORT 4—gray oral reading tests. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests–revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Kirby.

Appendix: word analogy items

Appendix: word analogy items

See Table 9.

Table 9 Word analogy test items

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirby, J.R., Deacon, S.H., Bowers, P.N. et al. Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Read Writ 25, 389–410 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5

Keywords

Navigation