Abstract
This paper presents a longitudinal analysis of activity generation behaviour in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) between 1996 and 2016 for various activity types: work, school, shopping, other. The analyses are conducted using the data from the five most recent Transportation Tomorrow Surveys. For work and school purposes, the population is divided into sub-categories considering occupational sectors and educational levels respectively. Further subdivision is made by treating first work/school activity of the day and subsequent work/school activities as distinct activity types. Considerable stability over time in the majority of the model parameters is found in all cases, indicating that both work/school and non-work/school activity episode generation in the GTHA has been very stable over the 20-year period analyzed. Year-specific models and joint models, within which the data are pooled across the years, return very similar results implying that robust joint models that exploit the full time-series of survey data available can be constructed. While first-trips to work and post-secondary schools in the day can be parametrically modelled with reasonable fits, second/subsequent work/school activities and non-work/school activities display considerable randomness in occurrence. Elementary and secondary school trips generally need only be modelled using average trip rates across the student population: parametric, utility-based models provide very little additional explanatory power. In addition, investigation of survey design biases shows that there is no significant survey design effect on activity/trip generation for the first work/school-related activities, however, the models reveal significant biases when the subsequent work/school-related activities and non-work/school activities are analyzed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Exceptions include facilitating a passenger or taking children to daycare.
Since the activity participation frequencies are non-negative integers, ordinary least squares regression is not a suitable model structure as it does not restrict the dependent variable to be non-negative (Susmel 2015).
There can only be one individual from each household who is designated as the respondent, as the survey is completed through a single person, unless the survey is completed online in year 2016.
All parameter estimates are statistically significant at least at a 95% confidence interval and are of expected signs. Parameter names are self-explanatory.
Owing to large sample sizes, adjusted ρ2 values in all models are almost equal to ρ2 values, hence they are not provided here.
Note that, insignificant variables were removed from the second part of the count data models after exploring all possible regressors.
Individual’s age should be greater than or equal to 11 to be considered as “TRE”. This definition follows from the fact that TTS does not record the trips of individuals younger than 11.
“PD” stands for “planning district”.
This is expected as they are almost the same model in the given particular case.
References
Ashby, B.: Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2016: data guide. Technical report. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2016/2016TTS_DataGuide.pdf (2018). Accessed 8 Aug 2018
Badoe, D.A.: An investigation into the long range transferability of work-trip discrete mode choice models. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (1994)
Badoe, D.A., Miller, E.J.: Comparison of alternative methods for updating disaggregate logit mode choice models. Transp. Res. Rec. 1493, 90–100 (1995)
Badoe, D.A., Miller, E.J.: Modelling mode choice with data from two independent cross-sectional surveys: an investigation. Transp. Plan. Technol. 21(4), 235–261 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069808717611
Badoe, D.A., Steuart, G.N.: Impact of interviewing by proxy in travel survey conducted by telephone. J. Adv. Transp. 36(1), 43–62 (2002)
Badoe, D.A., Steuart, G.N.: Urban and travel changes in the greater Toronto area and the transferability of trip generation models. Transp. Plan. Technol. 20(4), 267–290 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069708717594
Badoe, D.A., Wadhawan, B.: Jointly estimated cross-sectional mode choice models: specification and forecast performance. J. Transp. Eng. 128(3), 259–269 (2002)
Caird, S., Lane, A., Swithenby, E.: Greening higher education qualification programmes with online learning. In: Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Caeiro, S. (eds.) E-learning and Sustainability. Umweltbildung, Umweltkommunikation und Nachhaltigkeit—Environmental Education, Communication and Sustainability, vol. 35, pp. 105–116. Peter Lang Scientific Publishers, Frankfurt am Main (2014)
Cameron, A.C.: Advances in count data regression: I. Basic cross-section methods. In: 28th Annual Workshop in Applied Statistics, Southern California Chapter of the American Statistical Association. University of California, Los Angeles. http://cameron.econ.ucdavis.edu/racd/trcountI4up.pdf (2009). Accessed 7 Oct 2018
Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.K.: Regression Analysis of Count Data, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)
Castiglione, J., Bradley, M., Gleibe, J.: Activity-Based Travel Demand Models: A Primer, Report S2-C46-RR-1. Transportation Research Board, Washington (2015)
Chung, B., Srikukenthiran, S., Habib, K.M.N., Miller, E.J.: The development of a web-survey builder (STAISI): designing household travel surveys for data accuracy and reduced response Burden. In: Presented at 11th International Conference on Transport Survey Methods. https://uttri.utoronto.ca/files/2017/09/-ISCTSC_11_paper_16-Development-of-a-Web-Survey-Builder-Platform-for-Household-Travel-Surveys.pdf (2017). Accessed 3 Mar 2019
Ciari, F., Marmolejo, A., Stahel, A., Axhausen, K.W.: Mobility patterns in Switzerland: past, present, future. In: Paper Presented at the 13th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2013), Ascona, Switzerland (2013)
Cotrus, A.V., Prashker, J.N., Shiftan, Y.: Spatial and temporal transferability of trip generation demand models in Israel. J. Transp. Stat. 8(1), 37–56 (2005)
Croissant, Y.: mlogit: A Package for Estimation of Multinomial Logit Models in R (2019)
Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 1996 Data Guide. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/1996/dataguide.pdf (1997). Accessed 19 July 2018
Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 2001 Data Guide. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2001/dataguide2001.pdf (2003). Accessed 19 July 2018
Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 2006 Data Guide. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/dataguide2006_v1.pdf (2008). Accessed 19 July 2018
Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 2011 Data Guide. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2011/dataguide2011.pdf (2013a). Accessed 19 July 2018
Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 2011 TTS Version 1.0: Data Expansion and Validation. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2011/validation2011.pdf (2013b). Accessed 9 Sept 2018
Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: Reports. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/transportation-tomorrow-survey/tts-reports (2014). Accessed 5 Sept 2018
Dianat, L., Habib, K.M.N., Miller, E.J.: Modeling and forecasting daily non-work/school activity patterns in an activity-based model using skeleton schedule constraints. Transp. Res. Part A (2018)
Elias, W., Bekhor, S., Shiftan, Y.: Analysis of travel behavior in Arab communities in Israel: A Comparison Of Household Surveys. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(1), 162–169 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.01.002
Farag, S., Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., Faber, J.: Shopping online and/or in-store? A structural equation model of the relationships between E-shopping and in-store shopping. Transp. Res. Part A 41(2), 125–141 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.02.003
Ford, C.: Getting Started with Hurdle Models. University of Virginia Library: Research Data Services and Sciences. https://data.library.virginia.edu/getting-started-with-hurdle-models/ (2016). Accessed 25 Oct 2018
Fox, J.B.: Temporal transferability of mode-destination choice models. PhD dissertation, University of Leeds, Leeds, England (2015)
Golob, T.F., Regan, A.C.: Impacts of information technology on personal travel and commercial vehicle operations: research challenges and opportunities. Transp. Res. Part C 9(2), 87–121 (2001)
Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2011)
Habib, K.M.N.: Modelling activity generation processes. PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (2007)
Harding, C., Nasterska, M., Dianat, L., Miller, E.J.: Effect of land use and survey design on trip underreporting in Montreal and Toronto’s regional surveys. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 18(1), 36–59 (2018)
Hassounah, M.I., Cheah, L.-S., Steuart, G.N.: Under-reporting of trips in telephone interview travel surveys. Transp. Res. Rec. 1412, 90–94 (1993)
Henningsen, A., Toomet, O.: maxLik: A package for maximum likelihood estimation in R. Comput. Stat. 26(3), 443–458 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-010-0217-1
Hu, S.: Modelling trip generation/trip accessibility using logit models. PhD dissertation, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland (2010)
Huntsinger, L.F.: Temporal stability of trip generation models: an investigation of the role of model type and life cycle, area type, and accessibility variables. PhD dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, the United States of America (2012)
Inbakaran, C., Kroen, A.: Travel surveys: review of international survey methods. In: Prepared for 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Adelaide. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/-267365069_Travel_Surveys_-_Review_of_international_survey_methods (2011). Accessed 11 Mar 2019
Insee: Coefficient of Variation—CV—Definition. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/definition/c1366 (2016). Accessed 19 Jan 2019
Jackman, S.: pscl: Classes and Methods for R Developed in the Political Science Computational Laboratory. United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, R package version 1.5.2. https://github.com/atahk/pscl/ (2017)
Kannel, E., Heathington, K.: The temporal stability of trip generation relationships. Technical paper (1972). https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284313837
Kleiber, C., Zeileis, A.: Visualizing count data regressions using rootograms. Am. Stat. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1173590
Lee, R.J., Sener, I.N., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Relationships between the online and in-store shopping frequency of Davis. Calif. Resid. Trans. Res. Part A 100, 40–52 (2017)
McFadden, D.: Modeling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist, A., Snickars, F., Weibull, J. (eds.) Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, pp. 75–96. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1978)
McFadden, D.: Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. In: Manski, C.F., McFadden, D. (eds.) Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice, pp. 198–272. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge (1981)
Miller, E.J.: Agent-based activity/travel microsimulation: what’s next? In: Briassoulis, H., Kavroudakis, D., Soulakellis, N. (eds.) The Practice of Spatial Analysis: Essays in Memory of Professor Pavlos Kanaroglou, pp. 119–150. Springer, Berlin (2018)
Miller, E.J., Roorda, M.J.: A Prototype model of household activity/travel scheduling. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1831, 114–121 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3141/1831-13
Miller, E.J., Dalton, P., Briggs, R.: GTA trip generation rates, 1986–1996. Technical report. University of Toronto (1998)
Miller, E.J., Roorda, M.J., Carrasco, J.A.: A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation 32, 399–422 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-7962-3
Montgomery, D.C., Runger, G.C.: Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. Wiley, New York (2003)
Mullahy, J.: Specification and testing of some modified count data models. J. Econom. 33, 341–365 (1986)
Mwakalonge, J.L., Badoe, D.A.: Trip generation modeling using data collected in single and repeated cross-sectional surveys. J. Adv. Transp. 48(4), 318–331 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.217
de Dios Ortúzar, J., Willumsen, L.G.: Modelling Transport, 4th edn. Wiley, Chichester (2001)
Ozonder, G.: Technical documentation on cleansing transportation tomorrow survey data. Technical report, University of Toronto (2018)
Richardson, A.J.: Behavioural mechanism of non-response in mail-back travel surveys. Transp. Res. Rec. 1855, 191–199 (2003)
Richardson, A.J.: Sample bias in telephone interview travel surveys. In: Prepared for 10th Australian transport research forum, Melbourne, Australia. https://atrf.info/papers/1985/1985_Richardson.pdf (1985). Accessed 26 Feb 2018
Roorda, M.J., Morency, C., Woo, K.: Two cities, two realities? Trans. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2082(1), 156–167 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3141/2082-19
Rose, A.: Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2016: data expansion and validation. Technical report. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2016/2016TTS_DataExpansion.pdf (2018). Accessed 14 Nov 2018
Rotem-Mindali, O., Weltevreden, J.W.J.: Transport effects of e-commerce: what can be learned after years of research. Transportation 40, 867–885 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9457-6
Roy, R., Potter, S., Yarrow, K.: Designing low carbon higher education systems: environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 9(2), 116–130 (2008)
RStudio Team [Computer Software]. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/ (2019)
Russell, J.N., Bose, J., Giesbrecht, L.H.: Nonresponse bias in a travel survey of nontelephone households. In: Prepared for 2004 AAPOR Annual Meetings. https://nces.ed.gov/FCSM/pdf/IHSNG_AAPOR04_NR_FinalPaper.pdf (2004). Accessed 23 Dec 2018
Salem, S.M.K.M., Habib, K.M.N.: Use of repeated cross-sectional travel surveys to develop a meta model of activity-travel generation process models: accounting for changing preference in time expenditure choices. Transp. A Transp. Sci. 11(8), 729–749 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2015.1066900
Salem, S.M.K.M.: Temporal transferability of model components within an activity-based travel demand modelling approach. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (2016)
Shams, K., Jin, X., Argote, J.: Examining temporal transferability of trip frequency choice models. In: Transportation research board 93rd annual meeting, Washington, DC (2014)
Stopher, P.R., Jones, P.M.: Developing standards of transport survey quality. Keynote paper prepared for the international conference on transport survey quality and innovation: how to recognize it and how to achieve it, Kruger Park, South Africa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267242282-_developing_standards_of_transport_survey_quality (2001). Accessed 21 Feb 2018
Suel, E., Polak, J.W.: Incorporating online shopping into travel demand modelling: challenges. Prog. Oppor. Transp. Rev. 35(5), 576–601 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1381864
Susmel, R.: Lecture 7: count data models. Lecture notes. https://www.bauer.uh.edu/rsusmel/phd/ec1-22.pdf (2015). Accessed 4 Feb 2019
Train, K.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Travel Modelling Group [University of Toronto]: GTAModel V4.0: design, background, and calibration. http://tmg.utoronto.ca/documents/ (2015). Accessed 18 Oct 2017
Versteijlen, M., Salgado, F.P., Groesbeek, M.J., Counotte, A.: Pros and cons of online education as a measure to reduce carbon emissions in higher education in the Netherlands. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 28, 80–89 (2017)
Weltevreden, W.J.W., Van Rietbergen, T.: E-shopping versus city centre shopping: the role of perceived city centre attractiveness. Role Perceived City Centre Attract. 98(1), 68–85 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00377.x
Winslott Hiselius, L., Rosqvist, L.S., Adell, E.: Travel behaviour of online shoppers in Sweden. Transp. Telecommun. 16(1), 21–30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2015-0003
Yasmin, F., Morency, C., Roorda, M.J.: Trend analysis of activity generation attributes over time. Transportation 44(1), 69–89 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9624-z
Yunker, K.R.: Tests of the temporal stability of travel simulation models in southeastern Wisconsin. Transp. Res. Rec. 610, 1–5 (1976)
Zeileis, A., Kleiber, C., Jackman, S.: Regression models for count data in R. J. Stat. Softw. 27, 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i08
Acknowledgements
This study was funded in part by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship and a Richard M. Soberman Fellowship (Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto). Partial funding was also provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada) Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2014-04479).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Authors’ contribution
GO: Analysis, literature review, manuscript writing, editing and content planning, EJM: Supervision on analysis and results, manuscript writing, editing and content planning.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
This paper has no conflict of interest with any third party.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozonder, G., Miller, E.J. Longitudinal analysis of activity generation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Transportation 48, 1149–1183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10089-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10089-w