Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Longitudinal analysis of activity generation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a longitudinal analysis of activity generation behaviour in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) between 1996 and 2016 for various activity types: work, school, shopping, other. The analyses are conducted using the data from the five most recent Transportation Tomorrow Surveys. For work and school purposes, the population is divided into sub-categories considering occupational sectors and educational levels respectively. Further subdivision is made by treating first work/school activity of the day and subsequent work/school activities as distinct activity types. Considerable stability over time in the majority of the model parameters is found in all cases, indicating that both work/school and non-work/school activity episode generation in the GTHA has been very stable over the 20-year period analyzed. Year-specific models and joint models, within which the data are pooled across the years, return very similar results implying that robust joint models that exploit the full time-series of survey data available can be constructed. While first-trips to work and post-secondary schools in the day can be parametrically modelled with reasonable fits, second/subsequent work/school activities and non-work/school activities display considerable randomness in occurrence. Elementary and secondary school trips generally need only be modelled using average trip rates across the student population: parametric, utility-based models provide very little additional explanatory power. In addition, investigation of survey design biases shows that there is no significant survey design effect on activity/trip generation for the first work/school-related activities, however, the models reveal significant biases when the subsequent work/school-related activities and non-work/school activities are analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Exceptions include facilitating a passenger or taking children to daycare.

  2. Since the activity participation frequencies are non-negative integers, ordinary least squares regression is not a suitable model structure as it does not restrict the dependent variable to be non-negative (Susmel 2015).

  3. There can only be one individual from each household who is designated as the respondent, as the survey is completed through a single person, unless the survey is completed online in year 2016.

  4. All parameter estimates are statistically significant at least at a 95% confidence interval and are of expected signs. Parameter names are self-explanatory.

  5. Owing to large sample sizes, adjusted ρ2 values in all models are almost equal to ρ2 values, hence they are not provided here.

  6. Note that, insignificant variables were removed from the second part of the count data models after exploring all possible regressors.

  7. Individual’s age should be greater than or equal to 11 to be considered as “TRE”. This definition follows from the fact that TTS does not record the trips of individuals younger than 11.

  8. “PD” stands for “planning district”.

  9. This is expected as they are almost the same model in the given particular case.

References

  • Ashby, B.: Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2016: data guide. Technical report. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2016/2016TTS_DataGuide.pdf (2018). Accessed 8 Aug 2018

  • Badoe, D.A.: An investigation into the long range transferability of work-trip discrete mode choice models. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (1994)

  • Badoe, D.A., Miller, E.J.: Comparison of alternative methods for updating disaggregate logit mode choice models. Transp. Res. Rec. 1493, 90–100 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Badoe, D.A., Miller, E.J.: Modelling mode choice with data from two independent cross-sectional surveys: an investigation. Transp. Plan. Technol. 21(4), 235–261 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069808717611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badoe, D.A., Steuart, G.N.: Impact of interviewing by proxy in travel survey conducted by telephone. J. Adv. Transp. 36(1), 43–62 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badoe, D.A., Steuart, G.N.: Urban and travel changes in the greater Toronto area and the transferability of trip generation models. Transp. Plan. Technol. 20(4), 267–290 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069708717594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badoe, D.A., Wadhawan, B.: Jointly estimated cross-sectional mode choice models: specification and forecast performance. J. Transp. Eng. 128(3), 259–269 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caird, S., Lane, A., Swithenby, E.: Greening higher education qualification programmes with online learning. In: Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Caeiro, S. (eds.) E-learning and Sustainability. Umweltbildung, Umweltkommunikation und Nachhaltigkeit—Environmental Education, Communication and Sustainability, vol. 35, pp. 105–116. Peter Lang Scientific Publishers, Frankfurt am Main (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A.C.: Advances in count data regression: I. Basic cross-section methods. In: 28th Annual Workshop in Applied Statistics, Southern California Chapter of the American Statistical Association. University of California, Los Angeles. http://cameron.econ.ucdavis.edu/racd/trcountI4up.pdf (2009). Accessed 7 Oct 2018

  • Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.K.: Regression Analysis of Count Data, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castiglione, J., Bradley, M., Gleibe, J.: Activity-Based Travel Demand Models: A Primer, Report S2-C46-RR-1. Transportation Research Board, Washington (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, B., Srikukenthiran, S., Habib, K.M.N., Miller, E.J.: The development of a web-survey builder (STAISI): designing household travel surveys for data accuracy and reduced response Burden. In: Presented at 11th International Conference on Transport Survey Methods. https://uttri.utoronto.ca/files/2017/09/-ISCTSC_11_paper_16-Development-of-a-Web-Survey-Builder-Platform-for-Household-Travel-Surveys.pdf (2017). Accessed 3 Mar 2019

  • Ciari, F., Marmolejo, A., Stahel, A., Axhausen, K.W.: Mobility patterns in Switzerland: past, present, future. In: Paper Presented at the 13th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC 2013), Ascona, Switzerland (2013)

  • Cotrus, A.V., Prashker, J.N., Shiftan, Y.: Spatial and temporal transferability of trip generation demand models in Israel. J. Transp. Stat. 8(1), 37–56 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Y.: mlogit: A Package for Estimation of Multinomial Logit Models in R (2019)

  • Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 1996 Data Guide. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/1996/dataguide.pdf (1997). Accessed 19 July 2018

  • Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 2001 Data Guide. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2001/dataguide2001.pdf (2003). Accessed 19 July 2018

  • Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 2006 Data Guide. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/dataguide2006_v1.pdf (2008). Accessed 19 July 2018

  • Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 2011 Data Guide. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2011/dataguide2011.pdf (2013a). Accessed 19 July 2018

  • Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: 2011 TTS Version 1.0: Data Expansion and Validation. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2011/validation2011.pdf (2013b). Accessed 9 Sept 2018

  • Data Management Group [University of Toronto]: Reports. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/transportation-tomorrow-survey/tts-reports (2014). Accessed 5 Sept 2018

  • Dianat, L., Habib, K.M.N., Miller, E.J.: Modeling and forecasting daily non-work/school activity patterns in an activity-based model using skeleton schedule constraints. Transp. Res. Part A (2018)

  • Elias, W., Bekhor, S., Shiftan, Y.: Analysis of travel behavior in Arab communities in Israel: A Comparison Of Household Surveys. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(1), 162–169 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farag, S., Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., Faber, J.: Shopping online and/or in-store? A structural equation model of the relationships between E-shopping and in-store shopping. Transp. Res. Part A 41(2), 125–141 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C.: Getting Started with Hurdle Models. University of Virginia Library: Research Data Services and Sciences. https://data.library.virginia.edu/getting-started-with-hurdle-models/ (2016). Accessed 25 Oct 2018

  • Fox, J.B.: Temporal transferability of mode-destination choice models. PhD dissertation, University of Leeds, Leeds, England (2015)

  • Golob, T.F., Regan, A.C.: Impacts of information technology on personal travel and commercial vehicle operations: research challenges and opportunities. Transp. Res. Part C 9(2), 87–121 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, K.M.N.: Modelling activity generation processes. PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (2007)

  • Harding, C., Nasterska, M., Dianat, L., Miller, E.J.: Effect of land use and survey design on trip underreporting in Montreal and Toronto’s regional surveys. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 18(1), 36–59 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassounah, M.I., Cheah, L.-S., Steuart, G.N.: Under-reporting of trips in telephone interview travel surveys. Transp. Res. Rec. 1412, 90–94 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen, A., Toomet, O.: maxLik: A package for maximum likelihood estimation in R. Comput. Stat. 26(3), 443–458 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-010-0217-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S.: Modelling trip generation/trip accessibility using logit models. PhD dissertation, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland (2010)

  • Huntsinger, L.F.: Temporal stability of trip generation models: an investigation of the role of model type and life cycle, area type, and accessibility variables. PhD dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, the United States of America (2012)

  • Inbakaran, C., Kroen, A.: Travel surveys: review of international survey methods. In: Prepared for 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Adelaide. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/-267365069_Travel_Surveys_-_Review_of_international_survey_methods (2011). Accessed 11 Mar 2019

  • Insee: Coefficient of Variation—CV—Definition. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/definition/c1366 (2016). Accessed 19 Jan 2019

  • Jackman, S.: pscl: Classes and Methods for R Developed in the Political Science Computational Laboratory. United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, R package version 1.5.2. https://github.com/atahk/pscl/ (2017)

  • Kannel, E., Heathington, K.: The temporal stability of trip generation relationships. Technical paper (1972). https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284313837

  • Kleiber, C., Zeileis, A.: Visualizing count data regressions using rootograms. Am. Stat. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1173590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.J., Sener, I.N., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Relationships between the online and in-store shopping frequency of Davis. Calif. Resid. Trans. Res. Part A 100, 40–52 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D.: Modeling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist, A., Snickars, F., Weibull, J. (eds.) Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, pp. 75–96. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D.: Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. In: Manski, C.F., McFadden, D. (eds.) Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice, pp. 198–272. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E.J.: Agent-based activity/travel microsimulation: what’s next? In: Briassoulis, H., Kavroudakis, D., Soulakellis, N. (eds.) The Practice of Spatial Analysis: Essays in Memory of Professor Pavlos Kanaroglou, pp. 119–150. Springer, Berlin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E.J., Roorda, M.J.: A Prototype model of household activity/travel scheduling. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1831, 114–121 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3141/1831-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E.J., Dalton, P., Briggs, R.: GTA trip generation rates, 1986–1996. Technical report. University of Toronto (1998)

  • Miller, E.J., Roorda, M.J., Carrasco, J.A.: A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation 32, 399–422 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-7962-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.C., Runger, G.C.: Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. Wiley, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullahy, J.: Specification and testing of some modified count data models. J. Econom. 33, 341–365 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwakalonge, J.L., Badoe, D.A.: Trip generation modeling using data collected in single and repeated cross-sectional surveys. J. Adv. Transp. 48(4), 318–331 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Dios Ortúzar, J., Willumsen, L.G.: Modelling Transport, 4th edn. Wiley, Chichester (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozonder, G.: Technical documentation on cleansing transportation tomorrow survey data. Technical report, University of Toronto (2018)

  • Richardson, A.J.: Behavioural mechanism of non-response in mail-back travel surveys. Transp. Res. Rec. 1855, 191–199 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A.J.: Sample bias in telephone interview travel surveys. In: Prepared for 10th Australian transport research forum, Melbourne, Australia. https://atrf.info/papers/1985/1985_Richardson.pdf (1985). Accessed 26 Feb 2018

  • Roorda, M.J., Morency, C., Woo, K.: Two cities, two realities? Trans. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2082(1), 156–167 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3141/2082-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A.: Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2016: data expansion and validation. Technical report. http://dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2016/2016TTS_DataExpansion.pdf (2018). Accessed 14 Nov 2018

  • Rotem-Mindali, O., Weltevreden, J.W.J.: Transport effects of e-commerce: what can be learned after years of research. Transportation 40, 867–885 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9457-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, R., Potter, S., Yarrow, K.: Designing low carbon higher education systems: environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 9(2), 116–130 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RStudio Team [Computer Software]. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/ (2019)

  • Russell, J.N., Bose, J., Giesbrecht, L.H.: Nonresponse bias in a travel survey of nontelephone households. In: Prepared for 2004 AAPOR Annual Meetings. https://nces.ed.gov/FCSM/pdf/IHSNG_AAPOR04_NR_FinalPaper.pdf (2004). Accessed 23 Dec 2018

  • Salem, S.M.K.M., Habib, K.M.N.: Use of repeated cross-sectional travel surveys to develop a meta model of activity-travel generation process models: accounting for changing preference in time expenditure choices. Transp. A Transp. Sci. 11(8), 729–749 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2015.1066900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem, S.M.K.M.: Temporal transferability of model components within an activity-based travel demand modelling approach. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (2016)

  • Shams, K., Jin, X., Argote, J.: Examining temporal transferability of trip frequency choice models. In: Transportation research board 93rd annual meeting, Washington, DC (2014)

  • Stopher, P.R., Jones, P.M.: Developing standards of transport survey quality. Keynote paper prepared for the international conference on transport survey quality and innovation: how to recognize it and how to achieve it, Kruger Park, South Africa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267242282-_developing_standards_of_transport_survey_quality (2001). Accessed 21 Feb 2018

  • Suel, E., Polak, J.W.: Incorporating online shopping into travel demand modelling: challenges. Prog. Oppor. Transp. Rev. 35(5), 576–601 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1381864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susmel, R.: Lecture 7: count data models. Lecture notes. https://www.bauer.uh.edu/rsusmel/phd/ec1-22.pdf (2015). Accessed 4 Feb 2019

  • Train, K.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Travel Modelling Group [University of Toronto]: GTAModel V4.0: design, background, and calibration. http://tmg.utoronto.ca/documents/ (2015). Accessed 18 Oct 2017

  • Versteijlen, M., Salgado, F.P., Groesbeek, M.J., Counotte, A.: Pros and cons of online education as a measure to reduce carbon emissions in higher education in the Netherlands. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 28, 80–89 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weltevreden, W.J.W., Van Rietbergen, T.: E-shopping versus city centre shopping: the role of perceived city centre attractiveness. Role Perceived City Centre Attract. 98(1), 68–85 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00377.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winslott Hiselius, L., Rosqvist, L.S., Adell, E.: Travel behaviour of online shoppers in Sweden. Transp. Telecommun. 16(1), 21–30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2015-0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasmin, F., Morency, C., Roorda, M.J.: Trend analysis of activity generation attributes over time. Transportation 44(1), 69–89 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9624-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunker, K.R.: Tests of the temporal stability of travel simulation models in southeastern Wisconsin. Transp. Res. Rec. 610, 1–5 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeileis, A., Kleiber, C., Jackman, S.: Regression models for count data in R. J. Stat. Softw. 27, 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i08

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded in part by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship and a Richard M. Soberman Fellowship (Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto). Partial funding was also provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada) Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2014-04479).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Authors’ contribution

GO: Analysis, literature review, manuscript writing, editing and content planning, EJM: Supervision on analysis and results, manuscript writing, editing and content planning.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gozde Ozonder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This paper has no conflict of interest with any third party.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 252 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozonder, G., Miller, E.J. Longitudinal analysis of activity generation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Transportation 48, 1149–1183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10089-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10089-w

Keywords

Navigation