Abstract
This study examines whether the receptivity climate toward immigrants varies across traditional, new, and emerging Hispanic immigrant destinations in the U.S. and whether that climate is related to local unemployment rates and to the job-skill level of immigrants who settle in these places. We utilize unique, newly collected data to measure local labor market area immigrant receptivity climate based on content analysis of a random sample of all articles addressing immigrants/immigration which were published by local area newspapers from 1995 to 2010. The descriptive data show considerable diversity in local and regional immigrant receptivity patterns across the 380 U.S. labor market areas. Using annual labor market-specific unemployment rates, decadal measures of the educational attainment of immigrants and natives in the labor market area, and an annual summary measure of the immigrant receptivity climate, controlling for theoretically relevant labor market contextual characteristics, results from our regression models show that the immigrant receptivity climate is more negative where unemployment rates are higher. However, this relationship is evident only for new and non-destination areas compared with established immigrant destinations when control variables are considered. While a higher skill level of immigrants (a labor competition argument) is related to less negativity toward them, it does not explain the relationship between unemployment and immigrant receptivity climate. Overall, a high skill level of natives is the better explanation for a more positive immigrant receptivity climate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barkan, E. (2003). Return of the Nativists? California public opinion and immigration in the 1980s and 1990s. Social Science History, 27, 229–283.
Bergesen, A. J., & Herman, M. (1988). Immigration, race, and riot: The 1992 Los Angeles uprising. American Sociological Review, 63, 39–54.
Blinder, S., & Allen, W. L. (2016). Constructing immigrants: Portrayals of migrant groups in British National Newspapers, 2010-2012. International Migration Review, 50, 3–40.
Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 959–978.
Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 309–338.
Citrin, J., Green, D., Muste, C., & Wong, C. (1997). Public opinion toward immigration reform: The role of economic motivation. The Journal of Politics, 59, 858–881.
City of Dayton Office of the City Commission (2011). Welcome Dayton Plan, 2011. Immigrant Friendly City. Dayton: Author.
De Jong, G. F., & Steinmetz, M. (2004). Receptivity attitudes and the occupational attainment of male and female immigrant workers. Population Research and Policy Review, 23, 91–116.
Earl, J., Martin, A., McCarthy, J. D., & Soule, S. A. (2004). The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 65–80.
Espenshade, T. J., & Hempstead, K. (1996). Contemporary American attitudes toward U.S. immigration. International Migration Review, 30, 535–570.
Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhard, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fetzer, J. S. (2000). Public attitudes toward immigrants in the United States, France, and Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gambetta, R., & Gedrimaite, Z. (2010). Municipal innovation in immigrant integration: 20 cities, 20 good practices. Washington, DC: National League of Cities, American Cities Series.
George, L. (2007). What’s fit to print: The effect of ownership concentration on product variety in daily newspaper markets. Information Economics and Policy, 19, 285–303.
Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2007). Educated preferences: Explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization, 61, 399–442.
Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2014). Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 225–249.
Hall, M. S., Singer, A., De Jong, G., & Graefe, D. R. (2011). The geography of immigrant skills: Educational profiles of metropolitan areas. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program.
Higham, J. (1955). Strangers in the land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860-1925. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Ho, D. E., & Quinn, K. M. (2009). Viewpoint diversity and media consolidation: An empirical study. Stanford Law Review, 61, 781–868.
Hopkins, D. J. (2010). Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review, 104, 40–60.
Koopmans, R., & Rucht, D. (1999). Protest event analysis—Where to now? Mobilization, 4, 123–130.
Kriesi, H. R. K., Dyvendak, J. S., & Giugni, M. S. (1995). New social movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis: University Minnesota Press.
Laglagaron, L., Rodriguez, C., Silver, A., & Thanasombat, S. (2008). Regulating immigration at the state level. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute, National Center on Immigrant Integration Policy.
Lee, Y., & Ottati, V. (2002). Attitudes toward U.S. immigration policy: The role of in-group-out-group bias, economic concern, and obedience to law. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 617–634.
Lichter, D. T., & Johnson, K. (2009). Immigrant gateways and hispanic migration to new destinations. International Migration Review, 43, 496–518.
Mayda, A. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 510–530.
McCarthy, J. D., McPhail, C., Smith, J., & Crishock, L. J. (1999). Electronic and print media representation of Washington, D.C., demonstrations: A demography of description bias. In D. Rucht, R. Koopmans, & F. Neidhart (Eds.), Acts of dissent (pp. 113–130). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
O’Neil, K. (2010). Hazelton and beyond: Why communities try to restrict immigration. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
Olzak, S. (1989). Analysis of events in studies of collective actions. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 119–141.
Olzak, S. (1992). The dynamics of ethnic competition and conflict. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Perez, E. O. (2010). Explicit evidence on the import of implicit attitudes: The IAT of immigration policy judgment. Political Behavior, 32, 517–545.
Price, P., & Benton-Short, L. (2008). Migrants to the metropolis: The rise of gateway cities. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice and a response to perceived group threat: Population, composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586–611.
Rafail, P., Soule, S. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2012). Describing and accounting for trends in US protest policing, 1960-1995. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56, 736–765.
Ridgley, J. (2008). Cities of refuge: Immigration enforcement, policy, and the insurgent genealogies of citizenship in U.S. Sanctuary Cities. Urban Geography, 29, 53–77.
Rossell, L. M., De Jong, G. F., Graefe, D. R., & Maull, A.E. (2009). State immigration legislation and policy: Immigrant receptivity climate and access to public benefits and services. Penn State University Population Research Institute. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Public Policy and Management, Boston, MA.
Rucht, D., Koopmans, R., & Neidhardt, F. (Eds.). (1999). Acts of dissent. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Rustenbach, E. (2010). Sources of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Europe: A multi-level analysis. International Migration Review, 44, 53–77.
Scheve, K. F., & Slaughter, M. J. (2001). Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 133–145.
Singer, A. (2004). The rise of new immigrant gateways. The Living Cities Census Series. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Singer, A. (2005). The rise of new immigrant gateways: Historical flows, recent settlement trends. In A. Berub, B. Katz, & R. E. Lang (Eds.), Redefining urban and suburban America (pp. 41–86). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Singer, A., Hardwick, S. W., & Brettel, C. B. (Eds.). (2009). Twenty-first century gateways: Immigrant incorporation in suburban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Terrazas, A. (2011). Immigrants in new-destination states. Migration Information Source (February 8). Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved July 3, 2016, from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigrants-new-destination-states.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2004). The foreign-born population in the United States: 2003. Current Population Reports P20-551. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
Valentino, N., Brander, T., & Jardina, A. (2013). Immigration opposition among U.S. Whites: General ethnocentrism or media priming of attitudes about Latinos? Political Psychology, 34, 149–166.
Varsayi, M. W. (2008). Immigration Policing through the backdoor: City ordinances, the ‘right to the city’, and the exclusion of undocumented day laborers. Urban Geography, 29, 29–52.
Walker, K. E. (2014). Immigration, local policy, and national identity in the suburban United States. Urban Geography, 35, 508–529.
Walker, K. E., & Leitner, H. (2011). The variegated landscape of local immigration policies in the United States. Urban Geography, 32, 156–178.
Wells, M. J. (2004). The grassroots reconfiguration of U.S. immigration policy. International Migration Review, 38, 1308–1347.
Wilson, W. C., Grillo, M. C., & Teixeira, M. A. (2007). What’s in a place? Openness toward immigrants and community satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Zuniga, V., & Hernandez-Leon, R. (Eds.). (2005). New destinations: Mexican immigration to the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge support from the NIH Program Project Grant #P01 HD062498 and NIH Grant #R24HD041025 to the Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University. The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau. Most of the research in this paper was undertaken while Chris Galvan was at the Population Research Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Jong, G.F., Graefe, D., Galvan, C. et al. Unemployment and Immigrant Receptivity Climate in Established and Newly Emerging Destination Areas. Popul Res Policy Rev 36, 157–180 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-016-9408-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-016-9408-y