Abstract
The Census Bureau’s demographic analysis (DA) shows that the net undercount rate for children aged 0–4 was 4.6 percent in the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census while adults (age 18 and older) had a net overcount rate of 0.7 percent. For the population aged 0–4, DA estimates are seen as more accurate than the U.S. Decennial Census because the estimates for this young population rely heavily on highly accurate birth certificate data. Given the relatively high net undercount rate for young children, it would be useful to examine census coverage rates for this population in subnational geographic units. In this study, the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census counts of children aged 0–4 are compared to the corresponding figures from the Census Bureau’s Vintage 2010 Population Estimates in each state. Differences between the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census count and the Vintage 2010 Population Estimates for the population aged 0–4 range from an estimated net undercount of 10.2 percent in Arizona to an estimated net overcount of 2.1 percent in North Dakota. Larger states tended to have higher net undercounts than smaller states. The ten largest states account for about 70 percent of the national net undercount of the population aged 0–4. Of all the factors examined here, the relative size of the Blacks Alone or in Combination plus Hispanics population is most highly correlated with the estimated net undercount of the population aged 0–4. Other measures that were highly correlated with net undercount rates for the population aged 0–4 were linguistic isolation, percent of adults without a high school degree, and the unemployment rate. In general, characteristics of people are more highly correlated with the net undercount rates of young children than the characteristics of housing units.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. W., & Kasakoff, A. B. (1991). Estimates of Decennial Census underenumeration based on genealogies. Social Science History, 15(4), 527–543.
Adlakha, A. L., Robinson, J. G., West, K. K., & Bruce, A. (2003). Assessment of consistency of census data with demographic benchmarks at the subnational level. Census 2000 Evaluation 0.20. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
Anderson, B. A. (2004). Undercount in China’s 2000 Census in comparative perspective. PSC Research Report, No. 04-565, Population Studies Center. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Anderson, B. A., & Silver, B. D. (1985). Estimating census undercount from school enrollment data: An application to the Soviet Censuses on 1959 and 1970. Demography, 22(2), 289–308.
Bates, N., & Erdman, C. (2013). The U.S. Census Bureau mail return rate challenge: Crowdsourcing to develop a hard-to-count scores. Paper presented at the Federal conference on statistical methodology, Washington, DC.
Bruce, A., & Robinson, J. G. (2003). The planning database: Its development and use as an effective tool in Census 2000. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Demographic Association, Arlington, VA.
Bruce, A., & Robinson, J. G. (2007). Tract-level planning database with census 2000 census data. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
Buescher, P. A., Taylor, K. P., Davis, M. H., & Bowling, J. M. (1993). The quality of the New Birth certificate data: A validation study in North Carolina. American Journal of Public Health, 83(8), 1163–1165.
Coale, A. J. (1955). The population of the United States in 1950 classified by age, sex and color-a revision of Decennial Census figures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 16–54.
Coale, A. J., & Rives, N. W. (1973). A statistical reconstruction of black population of the United States: 1880 to 1970: Estimates of true numbers by age and sex, birth rates, and total fertility. Population Index, 39(1), 3–36.
Coale, A. J., & Zelnick, M. (1963). New estimates of fertility and population in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cohn, D. (2011). State population estimates and census 2010 counts: Did they match? Pew social and demographic trends . Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Crocker, R. (2011). House apportionment 2010: States gaining, losing and on the margin. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Darga, K. (1999). Sampling and the census. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.
Devine, J., Sink, L., DeSalvo, B., & Cortes R. (2010). The use of vital statistics in the 2010 demographic analysis estimates. Census Bureau working paper No. 88, available online at http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0088/twps0088.pdf.
Edmonston, B. (2001, February). Effects of Decennial Census undercoverage on analyses of school enrollments: A case study of Portland Public Schools. U.S. Decennial Census Monitoring Board, Report Series Report No. 05.
Goodkind, D. (2011). Child underreporting, fertility and sex ratio imbalance in China. Demography, 48, 291–316.
Gormley, W. T. (2012). Voices for children: Rhetoric and public policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Groves, R. M. (2011). Census learning: Lessons from 2010, planning for 2020, prepared statement testimony before Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security, U.S. Senate, April 6, 2011.
Kirby, R. S. (1997). The quality of data reported on birth certificates. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 301.
Mayol-Carcia, Y., & Robinson, J. G. (2011, October). Census 2010 counts compared to the 2010 population estimates by demographic characteristics. In Poster presented at the Southern Demographic Association conference, Tallahassee, FL.
Mule, T. (2012). Census Coverage Measurement Estimation Report: Summary of Estimates of Coverage for Persons in the United States, DSSD 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series #2010-G-01, Table 12. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
O’Hare, W. P. (1988). How to evaluate population estimates. American Demographics, 10(1), 27–30.
O’Hare, W. P. (1999). The overlooked undercount: Children missed in the Decennial Census . Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
O’Hare, W. P. (2009). Why are young children missed so often in the census. KIDS COUNT Working Paper, The Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore MD. December, available online at http://www.aecf.org/~/media/Pubs/Other/W/WhoAreYoungChildrenMissedSoOftenintheCensus/final%20census%20undercount%20paper.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2013.
O’Hare, W. P. (2012). The net undercount of children in the 2010 Decennial Census, Paper presented at the applied demography conference at the University of Texas, San Antonio.
O’Hare, W. P. (2012b). The undercount of children in the 2010 census and its implications. Presentation at the Joint Statistical Meeting, San Diego, CA, August 2, 2012.
O’Hare, W. P. (2013). Undercount of children in the census. Poster presented at the Population Association of American annual meeting, New Orleans.
O’Hare, W. P. (2014a). Assessing net coverage error for young children in the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Center for Survey Measurement Study Series (Survey Methodology #2014-02). U.S. Census Bureau. Available online at http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/ssm2014-02.pdf.
O’Hare, W. P. (2014b). Historical examination of net coverage error for children in the U.S. Decennial Census: 1950 to 2010. Center for Survey Measurement Study Series (Survey Methodology #2014-03). U.S. Census Bureau. Available online at http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/ssm2014-03.pdf.
Reamer, A., & Blanchard, R. (2010). Counting for dollars: The role of the Decennial Census in the distribution of federal funds. The Brookings Institution, Washington DC. Available online at http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2010/03/09-census-dollars. Accessed 15 Sept 2013.
Robinson, J. G., & Adlakha, A. (2002). Comparison of A.C.E. revision II with demographic analysis, DSSD, A.C.E. Revision II Memorandum Series #PP-41. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
Robinson, G. J., Bashir, A., Das Dupta, P., & Woodward, K. A. (1993). Estimates of population coverage in the 1990 United States census based on demographic analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423), 1061–1071.
Siegel, J. S., Passel, J. S., Rives, N. W., Robinson, J. G. (1977, December). Developmental estimates of the coverage of the population of states in the 1970 census: Demographic analysis. Current Population Reports, Special Studies, Series P-23, No. 65.
Siegel, J. S., & Zelnik, M. (1966). An evaluation of coverage in the 1960 Decennial Census of population by techniques of demographic analysis and by composite methods. In Proceedings of the social statistics section of the American Statistical Association (Vol. 1966, pp. 71–85). Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
Statistics Canada. (2004). 2001 Census technical report: Coverage. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-394-X, Ottawa, ON.
Statistics Canada. (2010). 2006 Census technical report: Coverage, Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-567-X, Ottawa, ON.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003, March 12). Technical assessment of A.C.E. revision II, U.S. Decennial Census Bureau.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010).Tables released at December 2010 Conference Table 8 available online at http://www.census.gov/coverage_measurement/demographic_analysis/. Accessed 12 Dec 2010.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Population estimation methodology. Available online at http://www.census.gov/popest/methodology/2009-stco-char-meth.pdf.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2013a). Data from the 2010 ACS from Factfinder Table B06001 http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?fpt=table.
U.S. Census Bureau. (no date). Methodology for the United States resident population estimates by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin and (Vintage 2009): April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2009. U.S. Census Bureau, Available on the Census Bureau’ website at http://www.census.gov/popest/methodology/2009-stco-char-meth.pdf.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2001). Guidance on aggregation and allocation of data on race for use in civil rights monitoring and enforcement. Accessed online May 2001, at http://raceandhealth.hhs.gov/sidebars/sbwhats15.htm.
Velkoff, V. (2011, March). Demographic evaluation of the 2010 Census. Paper presented at the 2011 PAA annual conference, Washington, DC.
West, K., & Robinson, J. G., (1999). What do we know about the undercount or children? Population Division Working Paper, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
Yowell, T., & Devine, J. (2013, July). Evaluating current and alternative methods to produce 2010 County population estimates. Population Division Working Paper 100, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
Zeller, A. (2006). Inconsistency between accuracy and coverage evaluation revision II and demographic analysis estimates for children 0 to 9 years of age, paper delivered at the American Statistical Association annual conference, available in proceedings at http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y2006f.html. Accessed 20 July 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Hare, W.P. State-Level 2010 Census Coverage Rates for Young Children. Popul Res Policy Rev 33, 797–816 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-014-9335-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-014-9335-8