Abstract
Aims
The rhizosphere microbiome substantially affects plant health, yet comparatively little is known regarding the foliar community dynamics. Here, we examine the relationship between the microbiota and their response to natural infection by pathogens.
Methods
We established an experimental system using a set of sorghum recombinant inbred lines (RILS). These RILS included four models denoted as resistant, moderately resistant, susceptible and highly susceptible. A combination of 16S rRNA and ITS gene amplicon approaches was used to assess bacteria and fungi, respectively, in foliar samples.
Results
We show that the foliar microbiome differs substantially in asymptomatic and symptomatic RILs subsequent to natural infection by pathogens. A significant association was found between plant health and microbial community structure. Our analyses revealed several distinct fungal and bacterial pathogens. These pathogens included Gibberella and Pantoea genera, which were associated with the highly susceptible group. In addition to these pathogens, we also found signatures for Ascochyta, a known plant pathogenic genus. Members of the bacterial genus Methylorubrum and the fungal genus Hannaella, both known to exhibit plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits, were associated with the resistant and moderately resistant groups. These data also reveal numerous highly diverse fungal and bacterial taxa in RILs that did not show symptoms. We also found taxonomic differences between the microbiota hosted by the symptomatic and asymptomatic RILs.
Conclusions
Together, these data suggest that pathogen infection may result in distinct microbiota. These results suggest that highly diverse microbiome may promote the plants ability to resist the effects of pathogens potentially contributing to plant health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The past three decades of research using model systems (Nicotiana tabacum and Arabidopsis thaliana) have revealed a variety of plant adaptations (Chang et al. 2016; Ritpitakphong et al. 2016; Xu et al. 2017). These studies have provided clear evidence that these traits have evolved in response to both biotic and abiotic environmental stressors (Lundberg et al. 2012; Ritpitakphong et al. 2016; Ryu et al. 2007). There is also evidence that healthy and asymptomatic plants co-exist with diverse assemblages of microorganisms, including protists, archaea, bacteria and fungi (Hassani et al. 2018; Lebreton et al. 2019). These microorganisms have collectively been shown to influence plant growth and productivity (Almario et al. 2017; Buée et al. 2009; Lindow and Brandl 2003; Stone et al. 2018). Plant-associated microorganisms positively influence plant health by increasing nutrient acquisition, stress tolerance and pathogen resistance (del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda et al. 2020; Finkel et al. 2019; Jones et al. 2019; Mia et al. 2014; Schirawski and Perlin 2018, Tsolakidou et al. 2019). However, our understanding of the interplay between microbiomes and plants remains rudimentary and has largely focused on model plant species (Aleklett et al. 2014; Berendsen et al. 2018; Edwards et al. 2015). Understanding the interaction between microbiomes and plants is central to the elucidation of the response to biotic and abiotic stress in agriculturally important crops (Jones et al. 2019). To ensure food security, it is essential to optimize the reliability of production pipelines by minimizing environmental impacts (Saad et al. 2020; Wille et al. 2019). Integrating insights regarding beneficial plant microbiomes to enhance plant growth and disease resistance will contribute to increased agricultural production which will ultimately contribute to food security (Busby et al. 2017; Mounde 2015; Pascale et al. 2020; Sivakumar et al. 2020).
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is a robust species with a high tolerance to drought, altitude and a wide range of temperatures (Medraoui et al. 2007). This species is a versatile crop which may be grown as a grain or sweet-stem. Sweet-stem sorghum is similar to grain (same species), however, it has a higher concentration of sugar in the stalks (Vanamala et al. 2018). Grain sorghum is an important staple food crop grown globally and sweet-stem sorghum is considered a promising biofuel feedstock (Mengistu et al. 2016). Yet, the full potential of sorghum productivity has not been realised due in part to an array of biotic and abiotic constraints (Savary et al. 2019). Biotic constraints may include weeds, animal pests, biological interactions and plant pathogens (Donatelli et al. 2017; Ghersa 2012). Plant pathogens represent a constant and major food production constraint, with global crop losses estimated to be 20% – 30%, principally in areas with food shortages (Bandara et al. 2017).
While the vast majority of microorganisms are beneficial to plants, pathogens may colonize leaves and overwhelm the innate defence mechanisms causing plant diseases (Bandara et al. 2017; Chala et al. 2019; Kelly et al. 2017). The colonization by bacterial and fungal pathogens is a direct threat to the productivity and sustainability of sorghum production (Mihajlovski et al. 2015; Sanmartín et al. 2018; Tripathi et al. 2018). Currently, little is known regarding the diversity of microbiomes in sorghum crops and the interplay between associated bacteria and fungi remains unexamined. Additionally, there are no reported microbial community studies on sorghum recombinant inbred lines (RILs) in response to biotic stressors. Elucidating the composition of the sorghum microbiome and relating this to its effects on plant health may provide important cues on pathogen management. The limited studies available on the sorghum microbiome have been based on culture-dependent methodologies, which are known to miss 99% of microbial communities (Naylor et al. 2017; Oberholster et al. 2018; Schlemper et al. 2017). Recent reports, using metagenomic analysis, have revealed potential key taxa associated with the rhizosphere and seed of sorghum (Guo 2016; Hara et al. 2019; Kinge et al. 2019; Kuramae et al. 2020; Xu et al. 2018). However, none of these studies assessed the aerial region of the plant, which is suggested to be one of the primary entry sites for pathogens (Cernava et al. 2019). This knowledge deficit is broadly true for plants where, in contrast to the rhizosphere, substantially less is known regarding the effects of plant-microbe associations on foliar diseases.
The phyllosphere, the leaf-dominated aerial part of plants, represents one of the most abundant habitats for microbiota colonization (Bodenhausen et al. 2013; Bulgarelli et al. 2013; Carlström et al. 2019; Vorholt 2012). Commensals or beneficial symbionts which affect plant fitness by providing pathogen protection are ubiquitous in the phyllosphere (Busby et al. 2017; Helfrich et al. 2018; Innerebner et al. 2011). Despite the short life span nature of the phyllosphere, bacterial communities dominated by the phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes are found on leaves (Knief et al. 2010; Müller et al. 2016). Molecular studies suggest that yeast and fungal genera such as Cryptococcus, Sporobolomyces, Rhodotorula and associated species largely inhabit plant leaves (Glushakova and Chernov 2004; Thompson et al. 1993). Genera such as Cladosporium, Alternaria, Penicillium, Acremonium, Mucor, and Aspergillus are the filamentous fungi frequently colonizing the phyllosphere as epiphytes and endophytes (Arnold et al. 2000; Inácio et al. 2002; Rana et al. 2019). However, such a phylogenetic conservation of community composition suggests that community assembly is not a random process but is instead governed by structuring principles, which are currently only poorly understood (Laforest-Lapointe and Whitaker 2019; Vorholt et al. 2017). Additionally, in contrast to the intensively studied roles of root-colonizing microbiota in plant health (Durán et al. 2018; Finkel et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2019), the collective community-level contribution of phyllosphere microbiota to plant growth, development and health is not well understood (Chen et al. 2020).
Sorghum RILs are useful models, produced for the population used in this work by inbreeding from individual F2 grain and sweet sorghum genotypes through single-seed descent procedure to the F9 generation (Shiringani et al. 2010). These lines have been used for quantitative genetic studies (Bekele et al. 2014; Shiringani et al. 2010). However, the microbiomes of these RILs and their relationship to natural pathogen infection has not been examined. To increase the understanding of the foliar microbiomes of sorghum RILs and its link to natural infection, we characterized bacteria and fungi associated with asymptomatic and symptomatic plants using 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequencing, respectively. In addition to revealing the relative abundance patterns of bacteria and fungi, we assessed the significant differential abundance of taxa in asymptomatic and symptomatic sorghum RILs and studied fungal and bacterial diversity of sorghum RILs.
Methods
RIL material
The mapping population was originally derived by selfing a single F1 plant from S. bicolor grain (M71) and sweet sorghum (SS79) and advanced to the F9 generation by single seed descent (Shiringani et al. 2010) to produce a mapping population of 187 F9 recombinant inbred lines (RILs). These RILs were mapped for quantitative traits such as grain yield and stem sugar-related traits for biofuel yield of sorghum. The F9 generation seeds used in this study were collected from the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) - Grain Crops Institute, Potchefstroom, South Africa (Table S1).
Cultivation of sorghum RILs
The sorghum RIL seeds were cultivated in a mixture of autoclaved vermiculite and perlite medium in pots disinfected at the ARC - Biotechnology Platform (ARC-BTP), Onderstepoort, South Africa. A pot experiment was carried out in a net-house which was used to reduce the damage caused by insects, wind and the hail in the crop. The net-house was used to mimic nature and is naturally ventilated and climate controlled (natural temperature and light). The RILs were subjected to the same planting conditions and were left to grow until the matured grain filling developmental stage (120 days old plant) to allow the plants to be naturally colonized by pathogenic and commensal microbes (primarily from the environment). Moisture was maintained by watering to weight every 2–3 days. To assess the role of sorghum leaf microbial community structure in sorghum disease manifestation, 45 leaf samples (positioned higher on the plant) from individual RILs at the grain filling stage (maturity) were retrieved. The foliar symptoms (Table 1) were scored according to the method described by TeBeest et al. (2004) (Table S1). The pathogen susceptibility of the RILs was based on foliar symptoms after allowing for natural infection by pathogens. The scale used presented visual foliar symptoms of four models that denoted, resistant (R), moderately resistant (MR), susceptible (S) and highly susceptible (HS) disease groups under natural infection. The symptoms and lesions on the leaf area of the R group was (1–10%) with MR, S and HS symptoms and lesions represented by 11–30%, 31- > 50% and 51- > 75%, of the leaf area, respectively.
Sampling
Leaf samples were collected from 45 individual RILs (foliar symptoms) across all disease groups. The number of samples collected for the resistant group (R) were (n = 11), moderately resistant (MR) (n = 10), susceptible (S) (n = 12) and highly susceptible (HS) (n = 12) Table 1. The leaves were harvested by hand (one individual leaf per RIL using gloves and forceps which was pre-sterilized with 70% ethanol for each leaf sampled). The leaf samples were kept in sterile bags in a − 4 °C ice box and were put in a − 80 °C freezer until further processing (DNA extraction).
Molecular ecology analyses
Leaf material, which was not disinfected to allow the identification of both the epiphytes and endophytes, was crushed using the Savant Fastprep™ FP120 Cell Disruptor (Thermofisher Scientific), followed by total DNA extraction using the Chemagic DNA Plant Kit (Chemagen, Perkin Elmer) as detailed in the manufacturer’s protocol. For bacterial amplification, primers with a PNA-PCR clamp added to block the amplification of host DNA were used to amplify the 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 region (Herlemann et al. 2011; Lundberg et al. 2012). For fungi taxon-specific primers, ITS1 and ITS4 regions were amplified as described previously (Gardes and Bruns 1993). Amplicons were purified using the MinElute® PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). The concentration and quality of the purified PCR product was evaluated using the Qubit Fluorometer (Invitrogen). The amplicon library was normalized and prepared for sequencing following the Illumina MiSeq 16S rRNA gene library preparation guide (Illumina 2013). Sequencing was performed utilizing the Illumina MiSeq Sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with a MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 to generate 2 × 300 paired-end reads at the ARC-BTP.
Bioinformatics analyses
Bacterial and fungal community patterns were analysed using the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology package (QIIME 2 v.2010.10) (Caporaso et al. 2010). The deblur plugin was used to remove chimeras and sequence variant calling of the Illumina amplicon sequences (Amir et al. 2017). The resultant sequences were used to determine differences in bacterial and fungal communities between asymptomatic and symptomatic samples. Sequences were clustered to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using a cut-off of 97% similarity. The resulting OTUs were compared against the trained, full-length SILVA 138 database for bacterial taxonomic classification (Yilmaz et al. 2014). Fungal OTUs were compared against the UNITE database for taxonomic analysis of ITS sequences (Abarenkov et al. 2010).
Exploratory analyses were performed in R v.3.5.1 and Bioconductor v.3.0 (Gentleman et al. 2004). Briefly, two indices were computed (Simpson and Shannon) in phyloseq (McMurdie and Holmes 2013) to measure diversity by accounting for “evenness” and richness. These indices were obtained using the plot_anova_diversity function of the microbiomeSeq package (Heruth et al. 2016). β-Diversity was visualized using PCoA ordinations generated with the Bray– Curtis distance metric. Ordinations were created with the phyloseq and ggplot2 (v2.1.0) packages. β-Diversity was measured using PERMANOVA with the betadisper function from the microbiomeSeq package (Heruth et al. 2016; Oksanen et al. 2007). Differential abundance analysis between the groups was obtained through the use of DESeq2 R package (Love et al. 2014). The taxonomical counts were normalized, and significant differentially abundant taxa with (p-adjusted value <0.05) were visualized using ggplot2 package. Taxonomic classification data was visualised using phyloseq and microbiomeSeq package (Suppl. Text. 1).
Results
Foliar assessments reveal discrete pathogen groups which were evenly distributed
The results from foliar assessments delineated the grouping of RILs into the following disease groups: resistant (R) (n = 11), moderately resistant (MR) (n = 10), susceptible (S) (n = 12) and highly susceptible (HS) (n = 12) (Table 1). Comparison of the distribution among disease groups were done using a Chi-square test. This analysis showed that the number of samples per disease group was evenly distributed.
Fungal and bacterial alpha diversity of sorghum leaves
Estimates of indices measuring richness (Shannon) and evenness (1-Simpson index), showed that fungal alpha-diversity differences between disease groups were statistically significant. The HS disease group had a significantly higher Shannon–Weaver index compared to the R group (ANOVA, p value = 0.034; df = 19) as shown in Fig. 1a. Fungal population diversity measure 1-Simpson index indicated a significant difference between HS and R (ANOVA, p value = 0.05; df = 19). Indices measuring evenness (1-Simpson index) suggest that the fungal populations on HS plants were less diverse compared to those on R plants. A significant difference in the Shannon–Weaver index between S and R (ANOVA, p value = 0.0136; df = 18) was observed, with S disease group indicating higher species richness. The MR group did not show any significant difference in 1-Simpson index diversity. However, in terms of the Shannon index, the MR group was associated with high species richness (see Table S2 for detailed statistics).
Similarly, the bacterial alpha-diversity differences resulted in HS disease group significantly harbouring high bacterial species richness (Shannon), compared to R group (ANOVA, p value = 0.034; df = 19) (Fig. 1b). However, diversity measures which account for evenness (1-Simpson index) suggest that HS samples were dominated by fewer species (ANOVA, p value = 0.05; df = 19). The R group was significantly more diverse (ANOVA, p value = 0.05; df = 19) consistent with low 1-Simpson index values compared to the other disease groups, based on species evenness (Fig. 3b). The Shannon index of the S disease group was associated with high species richness compared with the R group (ANOVA, p value = 0.026; df = 18). The diversity measures for the MR group did not show any significant difference with the other disease groups (see Table S3 for detailed statistics).
Beta-diversity and disease severity
PCoA showed a cluster for each disease group and the differences between the clusters were tested for significance using PERMANOVA (Fig. 2a). Beta-dispersion, used to measure variances in fungal abundance, revealed the significant differences in the microbial community dispersion (within-group variation in beta-diversity) between MR and HS (PPERMDISP = 0.002; df = 19) and R and HS (PPERMDISP = 0.005; df = 19). For bacterial abundance variation, beta- dispersion revealed a significant difference between the R and S group (PPERMDISP = 0.04; df = 19) (Fig. 2b). Permutation analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) and corresponding R-squared (R2) revealed that microbial communities were significantly differentiated across all the disease groups, with (R2 = 0.216, PPERMANOVA = 0.001; df = 41) for fungi and (R2 = 0.16, PPERMANOVA = 0.001; df = 41) for bacteria (see Table S2 and 3 for detailed statistics).
Fungal and bacterial composition of sorghum leaves
The impact of microbial communities on sorghum RILs after exposure to natural infection by pathogens was assessed in this study. The bacterial and fungal composition observed consisted of both reported disease-causing and beneficial taxa. The most dominant fungal pathogenic species, for the plants designated as HS, were the well-known phytopathogen members of the family Nectriaceae (40%) and the genus Gibberella (40%). Members of the genus Epicoccum (family Didymellaceae), were exclusively found in the R and S disease groups and accounted for over 5% relative abundance. In addition to these genera, members of families Didymellaceae (Ascochyta genus) and Ustilaginaceae (Ustilago genus) were found in the susceptible disease groups albeit in lower abundance (<5%). Furthermore, members of the families Didymellaceae (Didymella genus) and Massarinaceae (Sclerostagonospora genus), were also amongst the potential pathogenic taxa found across all disease groups, although in low percentages (Fig. 3a and b; Table 2). Table 2 further highlights the known potential sorghum pathogenic taxa and the pathogenic taxa not commonly found in sorghum. The dominant phyla were Ascomycota and Basidiomycota respectively, which in total comprised over 55% of the OTUs. Chytridiomycota, Kickxellomycota, Glomeromycota, Mucoromycota and Rozellamycota were detected at much lower relative abundances, cumulatively 9% of fungal OTUs. Unassigned fungi encompassed less than 13% of OTUs. The most substantial differences were observed among the different disease groups, with a higher relative abundance of OTUs found in the HS samples. Members of the family, Pleosporaceae, Bulleribasidiaceae, Tremellaceae with taxa in the genera Phoma (30%), Didymella (30%) and Papiliotrema (20%) dominated the samples designated as the R group (Fig. 3a and b). The S and HS disease groups had a high proportion of fungal OTUs, which agrees with results from Shannon diversity analyses (Fig. 1a). The R and MR groups had a similar fungal composition, however, the relative abundance of genera identified as Papiliotrema, Phoma and Cladosporium was high in the R group. Similarly, the S and HS disease groups had the same microbial composition with a high relative abundance (more than 20%) of Gibberella genus in the HS disease group, while Epicoccum was more abundant in the R and S disease group. Surprisingly, our analyses showed that the sorghum fungal community had more OTUs (478) compared to the bacterial OTUs (246) Table S4 and 5. The majority of these fungal OTUs (301) were shared and corresponded to 63% of OTUs distributed across all the disease groups. The HS disease group had the highest proportion of 11 unique fungal OTUs which corresponded to 2.3% of the total. The distribution of fungal OTUs in HS relative to R group is shown in Fig. 4a.
Analysis of bacterial abundance, revealing the composition of commensal and pathogenic bacteria of sorghum RILs across all disease groups at the family and genus levels is shown in Fig. 3c and d and Table 3. The known pathogen Pantoea (~ 10%) were exclusively associated with the HS disease group. The S disease group had a higher relative abundance of the genera Siccibacter and the pathogenic genus Cronobacter (~ 5% for both genera). It was found that Proteobacteria and Firmicutes had the highest relative abundances among all the disease groups. The dominant families across all disease groups were Erwiniaceae, Bacillaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadaceae with members of the genera, Bacillus and Pseudomonas highly dominant across all the disease groups. Among all disease groups, sequences assigned to members of the genera Bacillus and Kosakonia were found at high relative abundances in both R and HS disease group. The relative abundance of Bacillus sequences in both R and HS was evenly distributed (~ 10%). Similarly, an even distribution of relative abundance of Kosakonia sequences was observed in the R and HS disease group. These taxa were followed by members of the genus Sphingomonas which were highly abundant and evenly distributed (~ 10%) in the R and MR group. Bacterial sequences were assigned to 246 OTUs, with 81 of the OTUs, corresponding to 32.9% of the total, shared amongst all disease groups. The HS disease group harboured the highest proportion of unique OTUs (21), corresponding to 8.5%, while MR and S had the lowest number of unique OTUs (14), corresponding to 5.7%. Disease groupings S and HS shared 5 OTUs that corresponded to 5.3% of bacterial OTUs with only 5 OTUs corresponding to 2% shared between the R and MR groups (Fig. 4b).
Differential taxa abundance
Differential abundance analysis was conducted to determine the taxa that showed significant abundance between the R and HS disease group (differential abundance was performed between these groups as they showed significant differential abundance at p value ≤0.05). The relative difference in abundance was expressed as log2 fold change, with more represented differentially abundant taxa expressed at a log2 fold change of >0 and the less represented differentially abundant taxa expressed at a log2 fold change <0 (p < 0.05). Eleven (11) fungal genera, Gibberella, Epicoccum, Alternaria, Papiliotrema, Phoma, Aerobasidium, Cladosporium, Filobasidium, Ascochyta and Didymella showed significant differential abundance in the HS disease group, while Hannaella genus was significantly enriched in the R group.
The bacterial analyses showed 15 differentially abundant genera between the two disease groups and included Methylorubrum, Aeribacillus, Pantoea, Serratia, Halomonas, Enterobacter, Kosakonia, Sphingomonas, Acinotobacter, Paenibacillus, Enterococcus, Siccibacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Cronobacter. Members of the genera Pantoea and Serratia were significantly enriched in the HS disease group while Methylorubrum and Aeribacillus were highly enriched in the R group.
Discussion
The community dynamics of microbial assemblages linked to the rhizosphere of plants are increasingly well documented. Unfortunately, less is currently known regarding the composition and community dynamics of the foliar microbiome (Peñuelas and Terradas 2014). This study provides novel insights into the leaf microbial community structure and diversity of sorghum RILs. Our results suggest that previous studies may have underestimated the effects of natural infection in selecting the microbial communities in sorghum plants, as there are studies on naturally coexisting soil and rhizosphere microbial consortia (Nemergut et al. 2013; Zegeye et al. 2019). We found a strong correlation between the diseased groups and the sorghum microbiota after natural infection. This finding suggests that naturally occurring pathogens may considerably shape the structure of microbiota, favouring some taxa. The results of alpha diversity analysis (Fig. 1a and b), displayed clear contrasts between disease groups, which supports this hypothesis. The beta diversity analysis (Fig. 2a and b) indicated a distinction between the RILs displaying disease symptoms and those that did not show disease symptoms (S; HS and R; MR samples).
Among the most abundant taxa, we identified a considerable portion of fungal and bacterial genera which have reported beneficial and pathogenic attributes known to inhabit the cereal phyllosphere, together with a range of non-pathogenic yeasts, and filamentous fungi (Fig. 3a and c). The filamentous fungal genera such as Cladosporium, Alternaria and Sporobolomyces found in this study is in agreement with previous observations since these genera frequently colonize the phyllosphere as epiphytes and endophytes (Arnold et al. 2000; Glushakova and Chernov 2004; Inácio et al. 2002; Kinge et al. 2019; Rana et al. 2019). Consistent with our findings, members of the genera Aerobasidium, Fusarium, Alternaria, Cladosporium and Phoma were previously found in the wheat and maize phyllosphere (Fig. 3a) (Ripa et al. 2019; Szilagyi-Zecchin et al. 2016). Blixt et al. (2010) detected that Udeniomyces, Dioszegia and Cryptococcus fungal genera were found on the leaves of cereal crops (wheat) which were absent in our sorghum phyllosphere disease groups. The bacterial composition analysis, revealed high relative abundances of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes among all the disease groups. Previous studies showed that phyllosphere bacterial communities were dominated by the phyla Proteobacteria followed by Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes (Knief et al. 2010; Müller et al. 2016). Many genera such as Bacillus, Methylobacterium, Pantoea, Sphingomonas and Pseudomonas, which were also identified in this study, have been reported from the phyllosphere environment of different crop plants (Fig. 3c) (Aquino et al. 2019; Delmotte et al. 2009; Dobrovol’skaya et al. 2017; Kumar et al. 2019; Luo et al. 2012; Meena et al. 2012; Mukhtar et al. 2010). Furthermore, compared to other studies on cereal host plants, we did not detect sequences for Janthinobacterium, Pedobacter and Erwinia bacterial genera which largely dominate the wheat and barley phyllosphere (Kuźniar et al. 2020; Newton et al. 2010). This disparity may result from differences in the geographic characteristics and climatic parameters (Finkel et al. 2011).
Fungal and bacterial genera associated with the R, MR, S and HS disease group
The reported fungal pathogens were present at considerably higher proportions compared to bacteria in this study. While sorghum serves as a host to over 100 pathogens, previous studies suggest that fungal pathogens are more likely to colonize plants in comparison to bacterial pathogens (Akinrinlola et al. 2018; Zheng et al. 2016). In the present study, fungal genera Gibberella, Epicoccum and Ascochyta, were differentially abundant in the HS disease groups (Fig. 5a). These genera are pathogenic taxa and have been previously reported to be a major causative agent of grain mould disease, leaf stripe and leaf smut (de Oliveira et al. 2018; Jayashree and Wesely 2018; Kelly et al. 2017; Oliveira et al. 2017a; Sharma et al. 2011; Tivoli and Banniza 2007; Xu et al. 2019). Interestingly, members of the genus Epicoccum were also associated with the resistant group, albeit in low levels (Fig. 3a). Fungi belonging to the genus Epicoccum are ubiquitous ascomycetes frequently isolated from both healthy and diseased grapevines (Bruez et al. 2014; Del Frari et al. 2019; Hofstetter et al. 2012; Pancher et al. 2012). Pantoea, a sorghum bacterial pathogen causing leaf spot, was differentially abundant and linked to the HS disease group (Lana et al. 2012) (Fig. 3c and 5b). Members of the Serratia genus, known to colonize several dicotyledonous plants (cucurbits, sunflower and alfalfa) causing yellow vine disease was associated with the HS disease group, but there are currently no known reports of Serratia on sorghum leaves (Besler and Little 2017; Bolton et al. 2006) (Fig. 3c and 5b). However, not much is known regarding the host specificity of pathogens infecting agriculturally important plants like sorghum (Prospero and Cleary 2017; Rodriguez-Moreno et al. 2018).
It is important to highlight that the R and MR group had many of the fungal and bacterial OTUs that were taxonomically classified, and these taxa have previously been associated with plant growth-promoting and biocontrol activity. These included members of the fungal genera Papiliotrema, Alternaria, Didymella and Phoma; and bacterial genera Enterobacter and Sphingomonas (Knief et al. 2010; Saldajeno et al. 2012; Schisler et al. 2019; Schlemper et al. 2018; Poudel et al. 2016; Turbat et al. 2020; Zhou et al. 2018) (Fig. 3a and c). Hannaella yeasts and the Methylobacterium-Methylorubrum bacterial genera, which are frequently observed in the phyllosphere of various plant species (Caporaso et al. 2012; Edwards et al. 2015; Nasanit et al. 2015; Nutaratat et al. 2014), were also associated with the R and MR groups. Some members of the Hannaella genera are known to produce indole acetic acid (IAA) (Kaewwichian et al. 2015; Mehmood et al. 2018). However, the precise mechanisms of Hannaella yeasts in influencing plant performance and host-genotype specifically are unknown (Sun et al. 2014). Little is also known regarding the phylogenetic taxa and functional attributes of the recently classified Methylorubrum bacterial genus which was also associated with the R group (Fig. 3c and 5b, Green and Ardley 2018; Grossi et al. 2020). Nevertheless, members of this genus have plant-growth promoting abilities and usually colonize plants that display disease resistance (Ardanov et al. 2012; Bulgari et al. 2011; Koskimaki et al. 2015; Sagaram et al. 2009; Schisler et al. 2019; Schreiner et al. 2010; Rakotoarisoa et al. 2015; Trivedi et al. 2010; Wallace et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2018). Interestingly, the susceptible disease group had a higher relative abundance of members of the family Bacillaceae, which are usually associated with healthy plants (Das 2019; Klein 2008) (Fig. 3d). Nonetheless, members of this family also contain a plant pathogenic Bacillus genus that causes ginger rhizome rot and can survive harsh conditions (such as invasion by pathogens; Yuan and Gao 2015; Zheng et al. 2016). This may explain the high relative abundances of the Bacillaceae family in the susceptible disease groups. Pseudomonas, a known bacterial pathogen causing sorghum leaf blight, was associated with all the disease groups including R, MR, S and HS (Fig. 3c). The Pseudomonas genus has been previously reported to be an attractive biocontrol agent and this could explain its association with the R group in the present study (Gómez-Lama Cabanás et al. 2018; Panpatte et al. 2016; Praveen Kumar et al. 2012). Alternaria and Phoma, which are known to cause sorghum diseases (Astoreca et al. 2019; Fitt et al. 2006; Wei et al. 2020) were significantly associated with HS (Fig. 3a and 5a).
Fungal and bacterial α-diversity and β-diversity patterns associated with different disease groups
The alpha and beta-diversity metrics (Fig. 1a and b) showed that the RIL microbiome assemblage was associated with the severity of the disease symptoms. The R group had more fungal and bacterial diversity (evenness index) relative to the HS disease group. There were significant fungal and bacterial variation (beta diversity) between the RILs that showed disease symptoms (S and HS disease groups) and those that did not show disease symptoms (R and MR groups) (Fig. 2a and b). Similar to our study, vines with moderate disease symptoms displayed higher microbial diversity (evenness) than severely symptomatic vines (Deyett and Rolshausen 2019). Our data suggest that the role of plant-driven microbial assemblages may be pivotal for coping with the effects of biotic stresses and may result in increased environmental fitness (Berendsen et al. 2012; Deyett and Rolshausen 2019; Turner et al. 2013). In contrast with severely symptomatic vines, the toxic environment (e.g., occlusion of xylem vessel with tyloses and decrease of hydraulic conductivity; Deyett et al. 2019) is not conducive to microbial survival. A similar result was also observed in a soil microbiome study where soil surrounding healthy tobacco plants harboured more diverse microbial communities, contrasted to soil samples collected around bacterial wilt affected plants (Yang et al. 2017). Other studies have also shown that plants with a diverse microbial community were less prone to pathogen invasion than those with less diverse microbial communities (Berg et al. 2017; Shade 2017; van Elsas et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2017). This is likely due to increased competition for available resources among potential pathogens and other microorganisms in the less diverse community (Shade 2017). Our results indicate that the bacterial and fungal diversity (as measured by the Simpson diversity index) was significantly different between the R and HS disease groups. This finding suggests that highly diverse plant microbiomes may reduce the possibility of detrimental disease outbreaks as pathogens are likely to be outcompeted (Berg et al. 2017; Shade 2017; Yang et al. 2017).
Fungal and bacterial OTUs distribution between the disease groups
The largest number of unique OTUs were associated with the susceptible disease group in both bacterial and fungal datasets (Fig. 4a and b). This is consistent with previous studies which have shown that diseased hosts tend to harbour more unique OTUs when compared to healthy hosts (Rosenzweig et al. 2012). The fungal communities associated with the highly susceptible disease group was the most complex (richness). Zhang et al. (2018) recently reported an increase in the fungal community richness (Shannon index) and linked this to increased disease pressure. Another report revealed that soils with Fusarium wilt were colonized by more complex bacterial communities (richness) and also harboured significantly different community structure compared to healthy soils (Zhang et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2019). Our results on the leaf microbiome demonstrate similar patterns and possibly suggest that plant diseases may affect shifts in the phyllosphere of fungal and bacterial communities on sorghum leaves.
Conclusion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess both the fungal and bacterial composition in the leaves of sorghum RILs. We show that natural pathogen infection results in distinct foliar microbial communities in sorghum RILs. Together, our results suggest that different ‘resident’ consortia found in naturally infected and uninfected sorghum plants may be viable biocontrol and plant-growth promoting targets. These results have consequences for crop breeding, and the analysis of microbial diversity and community composition can be useful biomarkers for assessing disease status in plants. Future cultivation-based studies may clarify the influence of potentially beneficial taxa and their precise biological functions in vitro and in planta.
References
Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson K et al (2010) The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi–recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytol 186:281–285
Akinrinlola RJ, Yuen GY, Drijber RA et al (2018) Evaluation of Bacillus strains for plant growth promotion and predictability of efficacy by in vitro physiological traits. Int J Microbiol 2018:1–11
Aleklett K, Hart M, Shade A (2014) The microbial ecology of flowers: an emerging frontier in phyllosphere research. Botany 92:253–266
Almario J, Jeen G, Wunder J et al (2017) Root-associated fungal microbiota of nonmycorrhizal Arabis alpina and its contribution to plant phosphorus nutrition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:9403–9412
Amir AD, McDonald JA, Navas-Molina E et al (2017) Deblur rapidly resolves single-nucleotide community sequence patterns. mSystems 2(2):e00191–16
Aquino JPA, Macedo J, Francisco BDE (2019) Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria on maize and sorghum. Pesq Agropec Trop 49:e56241
Ardanov P, Sessitsch A, Häggman H et al (2012) Methylobacterium-induced endophyte community changes correspond with protection of plants against pathogen attack. PLoS One 7:10
Arnold AE, Maynard Z, Gilbert GS et al (2000) Are tropical fungal endophytes hyperdiverse? Ecol. Lett 3:267–274
Astoreca AL, Emateguy LG, Alconada TM (2019) Fungal contamination and mycotoxins associated with sorghum crop: its relevance today. Eur J Plant Pathol 155:381–392
Bandara Y, Weerasooriya DK, Tesso TT et al (2017) Stalk rot fungi affect grain sorghum yield components in an inoculation stage-specific manner. Crop Prot 94:97–105
Bandara Y, Weerasooriya D, Liu S et al (2018) The necrotrophic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina promotes charcoal rot susceptibility in grain sorghum through induced host cell-wall-degrading enzymes. Phytopathology 108:948–956
Bekele WA, Fiedler K, Shiringani A et al (2014) Unravelling the genetic complexity of sorghum seedling development under low-temperature conditions. Plant. Cell Environ 37:707–723
Bennett A, Ponder MM, Garcia-Diaz J (2018) Phoma infections: classification, potential food sources, and their clinical impact. Microorganisms 6:58
Berendsen RL, Pieterse CM, Bakker PA (2012) The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 17:478–486
Berendsen RL, Vismans G, Yu K et al (2018) Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium. ISME J 12:1496–1507
Berg G, Köberl M, Rybakova D et al (2017) Plant microbial diversity is suggested as the key to future biocontrol and health trends. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93(5)
Besler K, Little E (2017) Diversity of Serratia marcescens strains associated with cucurbit yellow vine disease in Georgia. Plant Dis 101:129–136
Blixt E, Olson A, Lindahl B et al (2010) Spatiotemporal variation in the fungal community associated with wheat leaves showing symptoms similar to Stagonospora nodorum blotch. Eur J Plant Pathol 126:373–386
Bodenhausen N, Horton MW, Bergelson J (2013) Bacterial communities associated with the leaves and the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 8:2
Bolton MD, Thomma BP, Nelson BD (2006) Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (lib.) de Bary: biology and molecular traits of a cosmopolitan pathogen. Mol. Plant Pathol 7:1–16
Bruez E, Vallance J, Gerbore J et al (2014) Analyses of the temporal dynamics of fungal communities colonizing the healthy wood tissues of esca leaf-symptomatic and asymptomatic vines. PloS One 9:5
Buée M, De Boer W, Martin F et al (2009) The rhizosphere zoo: an overview of plant-associated communities of microorganisms, including phages, bacteria, archaea, and fungi, and of some of their structuring factors. Plant Soil 321:89–212
Bulgarelli D, Schlaeppi K, Spaepen S et al (2013) Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol 64:807–838
Bulgari D, Casati P, Crepaldi P et al (2011) Restructuring of endophytic bacterial communities in grapevine yellows-diseased and recovered Vitis vinifera L. plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5018–5022
Busby PE, Soman C, Wagner MR et al (2017) Research priorities for harnessing plant microbiomes in sustainable agriculture. PLoS Biol 15:3
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J et al (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336
Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA et al (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624
Carlström CI, Field CM, Bortfeld-Miller M et al (2019) Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere. Nat Ecol Evol 3:1445–1454
Cernava T, Chen X, Krug L et al (2019) The tea leaf microbiome shows specific responses to chemical pesticides and biocontrol applications. Sci. Total Environ 667:33–40
Chala A, Degefu T, Brurberg MB (2019) Phylogenetically diverse Fusarium species associated with Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and finger millet (Eleusine Coracana L. Garten) grains from Ethiopia. Divers 11:93
Chang C, Bowman JL, Meyerowitz EM (2016) Field guide to plant model systems. Cell 167:325–339
Chen T, Nomura K, Wang X et al (2020) A plant genetic network for preventing dysbiosis in the phyllosphere. Nature 580:653–657
Das IK (2019) Advances in sorghum disease resistance. In: Visarada KBRS, Venkatesh B, Tonapi VA (eds) Aruna C. Elsevier, Breeding sorghum for diverse end uses, pp 313–324
Das IK, Padmaja PG (2016) Biotic stress resistance in millets, vol 246. Acad Press, USA, pp 23–67
de Oliveira RC, Carnielli-Queiroz L et al (2018) Epicoccum sorghinum in food: occurrence, genetic aspects and tenuazonic acid production. Curr. Opin. Food Sci 23:44–48
del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda M, Glick BR, Santoyo G (2020) ACC deaminase in plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB): an efficient mechanism to counter salt stress in crops. Microbiol Res 235:126439
Del Frari G, Cabral A, Nascimento T et al (2019) Epicoccum layuense a potential biological control agent of esca-associated fungi in grapevine. PLoS One 14:3
Delmotte N, Knief C, Chaffron S et al (2009) Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:16428–16433
Deyett E, Rolshausen PE (2019) Temporal dynamics of the sap microbiome of grapevine under high Pierce’s disease pressure. Front Plant Sci 10:1246
Deyett E, Pouzoulet J, Yang J et al (2019) Assessment of Pierce’s disease susceptibility in Vitis vinifera cultivars with different pedigrees. Plant Pathol 68:1079–1087
Dobrovol’skaya T, Golovchenko A, Yakushev A et al (2017) Bacterial complexes of a high moor related to different elements of microrelief. Eurasian Soil Sci 50:470–475
Donatelli M, Magarey RD, Bregaglio S et al (2017) Modelling the impacts of pests and diseases on agricultural systems. Agric Syst 155:213–224
Durán P, Thiergart T, Garrido-Oter R et al (2018) Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote Arabidopsis survival. Cell 175:973–983
Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos-Medellin C et al (2015) Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:911–920
Finkel OM, Burch AY, Lindow SE et al (2011) Geographical location determines the population structure in phyllosphere microbial communities of a salt-excreting desert tree. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:7647–7655
Finkel OM, Castrillo G, Paredes SH et al (2017) Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 38:155–163
Finkel OM, Isai S, Gabriel C et al (2019) The effects of soil phosphorus content on plant microbiota are driven by the plant phosphate starvation response. PLoS Bio 17:11
Fitt BD, Brun H, Barbetti M et al (2006) World-wide importance of Phoma stem canker (Leptosphaeria maculans and L. biglobosa) on oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Eur J Plant Pathol 114:3–15
Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118
Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM et al (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5(10):80
Ghersa C (2012) Agroecological basis for managing biotic constraints, in sustainable food production. Springer:18–30
Gilbert J, Fernando W (2004) Epidemiology and biological control of Gibberella zeae/Fusarium graminearum. Can. J. Plant Pathol 26:464–472
Glushakova A, Chernov IY (2004) Seasonal dynamics in a yeast population on leaves of the common wood sorrel Oxalis acetosella L. Microbiology 73:184–188
Gómez-Lama Cabanás C, Legarda G et al (2018) Indigenous Pseudomonas spp. strains from the olive (Olea europaea L.) rhizosphere as effective biocontrol agents against Verticillium dahliae: from the host roots to the bacterial genomes. Front Microbiol 9:277
Green PN, Ardley JK (2018) Review of the genus Methylobacterium and closely related organisms: a proposal that some Methylobacterium species be reclassified into a new genus. Methylorubrum gen nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:2727–2748
Grossi CEM, Fantino E, Serral F (2020) Methylobacterium sp. 2A is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that has the potential to improve potato crop yield under adverse conditions. Front Plant Sci 11:71
Guo J (2016) Rhizosphere metagenomics of three biofuel crops, PhD thesis. Michigan State University, Michigan, p 70
Hara S, Morikawa T, Wasai S et al (2019) Identification of nitrogen-fixing Bradyrhizobium associated with roots of field-grown sorghum by metagenome and proteome analyses. Front Microbiol 10:407
Hassan SM (2018) Chapter VI Management of diseases of date palm. In: El Bouhssini M, Faleiro JR (eds) Date Palm Pests and diseases-integrated management guide. ICARDA, Beirut, p 139
Hassani MA, Durán P, Hacquard S (2018) Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome 6:58
Helfrich EJ, Vogel CM, Ueoka R et al (2018) Bipartite interactions, antibiotic production and biosynthetic potential of the Arabidopsis leaf microbiome. Nat Microbiol 3:909–919
Herlemann DPR, Labrenz M, Jürgens K et al (2011) Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J 5:571
Heruth DP, Xiong M, Jiang X (2016) Microbiome-seq data analysis. In: Ye SQ (ed) Big Data Analysis. Taylor & Francis, Bioinforma Biomed Discov, p 97
Hofstetter V, Buyck B, Croll D et al (2012) What if esca disease of grapevine were not a fungal disease? Fungal Divers 54:51–67
Illumina (2013) 16S metagenomic sequencing library preparation guide. https://emea.support.illumina.com/content/dam/illuminasupport/documents/documentation/chemistry_documentation/16s/16s-metagenomic-library-prep-guide-15044223-b.pdf
Inácio J, Pereira P, Carvalho DM, Fonseca A et al (2002) Estimation and diversity of phylloplane mycobiota on selected plants in a mediterranean–type ecosystem in Portugal. Microb Ecol 44:344–353
Innerebner G, Knief C, Vorholt JA (2011) Protection of Arabidopsis thaliana against leaf-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae by Sphingomonas strains in a controlled model system. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3202–3210
Jayashree M, Wesely E (2018) Studies on fungi associated with stored grains of sorghum. Int J Res 6:476–477
Jones P, Garcia BJ, Furches A et al (2019) Plant host-associated mechanisms for microbial selection. Front Plant Sci 10:862
Kaewwichian R, Jindamorakot S, Am-In S et al (2015) Hannaella siamensis sp. nov. and Hannaella phetchabunensis sp. nov, two new anamorphic basidiomycetous yeast species isolated from plants. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:1297–1303
Kaplin VG, Matvienko EV, Kovalenko MV (2017) The defeat of sorghum with bacterial leaf stripe (Pseudomonas andropogonis) in the forest-steppe of the average Volga region. Bull Samara State Agric Acad 2:27–31
Kelly LA, Tan YP, Ryley MJ et al (2017) Fusarium species associated with stalk rot and head blight of grain sorghum in Queensland and New South Wales, Australia. Plant Pathol 66:413–1423
Kinge T, Cason ED, Valverde Portal Á et al (2019) Endophytic seed mycobiome of six sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cultivars from commercial seedlots using an Illumina sequencing approach. Mycosphere 10:739–755
Klein PE (2008) The effect of tropical sorghum conversion and inbred development on genome diversity as revealed by high-resolution genotyping. Crop Sci 48:12–26
Knief C, Ramette A, Frances L et al (2010) Site and plant species are important determinants of the Methylobacterium community composition in the plant phyllosphere. ISME J 4:719–728
Koskimaki JJ, Pirttila AM, Ihantola EL et al (2015) The intracellular scots pine shoot symbiont Methylobacterium extorquens DSM13060 aggregates around the host nucleus and encodes eukaryote-like proteins. MBio 6:39
Kruse J, Dietrich W, Zimmermann H et al (2018) Ustilago species causing leaf-stripe smut revisited. IMA Fungus 9:49–73
Kumar M, Kour D, Yadav AN et al (2019) Biodiversity of methylotrophic microbial communities and their potential role in mitigation of abiotic stresses in plants. Biologia 74:287–308
Kuramae EE, Derksen S, Schlemper TR et al (2020) Sorghum growth promotion by Paraburkholderia tropica and Herbaspirillum frisingense: putative mechanisms revealed by genomics and Metagenomics. Microorganisms 8:725
Kuźniar A, Włodarczyk K, Grządziel J et al (2020) Culture-independent analysis of an endophytic core microbiome in two species of wheat: Triticum aestivum L.(cv.‘Hondia’) and the first report of microbiota in Triticum spelta L.(cv.‘Rokosz’). Syst Appl Microbiol 43:126025
Laforest-Lapointe I, Whitaker BK (2019) Decrypting the phyllosphere microbiota: progress and challenges. Am J Bot 106:171–173
Lana UGDP, Gomes EA, Silva DD et al (2012) Detection and molecular diversity of Pantoea ananatis associated with white spot disease in maize, sorghum and crabgrass in Brazil. J Phytopathol 160:441–448
Lebreton L, Guillerm-Erckelboudt AY, Gazengel K et al (2019) Temporal dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities during the infection of Brassica rapa roots by the protist Plasmodiophora brassicae. PLoS One 14:2
Lindow SE, Brandl MT (2003) Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1875–1883
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550
Lundberg DS, Lebeis SL, Paredes SH et al (2012) Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488:86–90
Luo S, Xu T, Chen L et al (2012) Endophyte-assisted promotion of biomass production and metal-uptake of energy crop sweet sorghum by plant-growth-promoting endophyte Bacillus sp. SLS18. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93:1745–1753
Ma J, Wei L, Lin A et al (2019) The alternative splicing landscape of Brassica napus infected with Leptosphaeria maculans. Genes 10:296
McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:4
Medraoui L, Ater M, Benlhabib O et al (2007) Evaluation of genetic variability of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in northwestern Morocco by ISSR and RAPD markers. C R Biol 330:789–797
Meena KK, Kumar M, Kalyuzhnaya MG et al (2012) Epiphytic pink-pigmented methylotrophic bacteria enhance germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) by producing phytohormone. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 101:777–786
Mehmood A, Khan N, Irshad M et al (2018) IAA producing Endopytic fungus Fusarium oxysporum wlw colonize maize roots and promoted maize growth under hydroponic condition. Eur Exp Biol 8:24
Mengistu MG, Steyn JM, Kunz RP et al (2016) A preliminary investigation of the water use efficiency of sweet sorghum for biofuel in South Africa. Water SA 42:152–160
Mia MAB, Shamsuddin ZH, Mahmood M (2014) Effects of rhizobia and plant growth promoting bacteria inoculation on germination and seedling vigor of lowland rice. Afr J Biotechnol 11:3758–3765
Mihajlovski A, Seyer D, Benamara H et al (2015) An overview of techniques for the characterization and quantification of microbial colonization on stone monuments. Ann Microbiol 65:1243–1255
Moral J, Lichtemberg PSF, Papagelis A et al (2018) Didymella glomerata causing leaf blight on pistachio. Eur J Plant Pathol 151:1095–1099
Mounde LG (2015) Understanding the role of plant growth promoting bacteria on sorghum growth and biotic suppression of striga infestation. PhD thesis. University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany, p 113
Mukhtar I, Khokhar I, Mushtaq S et al (2010) Diversity of epiphytic and endophytic microorganisms in some dominant weeds. Pakistan J Weed Sci Res 16:287–297
Müller DB, Vogel C, Bai Y et al (2016) The plant microbiota: systems-level insights and perspectives. Annu Rev Genet 50:211–234
Nasanit R, Krataithong K, Tantirungkij M et al (2015) Assessment of epiphytic yeast diversity in rice (Oryza sativa) phyllosphere in Thailand by a culture-independent approach. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 107:1475–1490
Naylor D, DeGraaf S, Purdom E et al (2017) Drought and host selection influence bacterial community dynamics in the grass root microbiome. ISME J 11:2691–2704
Nemergut DR, Schmidt SK, Fukami T et al (2013) Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77:342–356
Newton A, Gravouil C, Fountaine J (2010) Managing the ecology of foliar pathogens: ecological tolerance in crops. Ann Appl Biol 157:343–359
Nida H, Girma G, Mekonen M et al (2019) Identification of sorghum grain mold resistance loci through genome wide association mapping. J Cereal Sci 85:295–304
Nutaratat P, Srisuk N, Arunrattiyakorn P et al (2014) Plant growth-promoting traits of epiphytic and endophytic yeasts isolated from rice and sugar cane leaves in Thailand. Fungal Biol 118:683–694
Oberholster T, Vikram S, Cowan D et al (2018) Key microbial taxa in the rhizosphere of sorghum and sunflower grown in crop rotation. Sci Total Environ 624:530–539
Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B et al (2007) The vegan package. Community Ecol Packag 10:719
Oliveira RC, Davenport KW, Hovde B et al (2017a) Draft genome sequence of Sorghum grain Mold fungus Epicoccum sorghinum, a producer of Tenuazonic acid. Genome Announc 5:10
Oliveira RC, Goncalves SS, Oliveira MS et al (2017b) Natural occurrence of tenuazonic acid and Phoma sorghina in Brazilian sorghum grains at different maturity stages. Food Chem 230:491–496
Omayio DO, Musyimi DM, Muyekho FN et al (2018) Molecular diversity of a seemingly altitude restricted Ustilago kamerunensis isolates in Kenya: a pathogen of Napier grass. Am J Mol Biol 08(02):119–143
Pancher M, Ceol M, Corneo PE et al (2012) Fungal endophytic communities in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) respond to crop management. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4308–4317
Panpatte DG, Jhala YK, Shelat HN et al (2016) Pseudomonas fluorescens: a promising biocontrol agent and PGPR for sustainable agriculture. In: Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R (eds) Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity. Springer, New Delhi, pp 257–270
Pascale A, Proietti S, Pantelides IS et al (2020) Modulation of the root microbiome by plant molecules: the basis for targeted disease suppression and plant growth promotion. Front Plant Sc 10:1741
Peñuelas J, Terradas J (2014) The foliar microbiome. Trends Plant Sci 19(5):278–280
Poudel R, Jumpponen A, Schlatter DC et al (2016) Microbiome networks: a systems framework for identifying candidate microbial assemblages for disease management. Phytopathology 106:1083–1096
Praveen Kumar G, Desai S, Leo Daniel AE et al (2012) Plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. from diverse agro-ecosystems of India for Sorghum bicolor. L. J Biofert Biopest S 7:2
Prospero S, Cleary M (2017) Effects of host variability on the spread of invasive forest diseases. Forests 8:80
Quaedvlieg W, Verkley GJM, Shin HD et al (2013) Sizing up septoria. Stud Mycol 75:307–390
Rakotoarisoa TF, Waeber PO, Richter T et al (2015) Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), any opportunities for the Alaotra wetlands and livelihoods? Madagascar Conserv Dev 10:128–136
Rana KL, Kour D, Sheikh I et al (2019) Endophytic fungi: biodiversity, ecological significance, and potential industrial applications. In: Yadav A, Mishra S, Singh S, Gupta A (eds) Recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi. Fungal Biol, Springer, Cham, p 162
Ripa FA, Cao W, Tong S et al (2019) Assessment of plant growth promoting and abiotic stress tolerance properties of wheat endophytic fungi. Biomed Res Int 12
Ritpitakphong U, Falquet L, Vimoltust A et al (2016) The microbiome of the leaf surface of Arabidopsis protects against a fungal pathogen. New Phytol 210:1033–1043
Rodriguez-Moreno L, Malaika KE, Melvin DB (2018) Tools of the crook-infection strategies of fungal plant pathogens. Plant J 93:664–674
Rosenzweig N, Tiedje JM, Quensen JF et al (2012) Microbial communities associated with potato common scab-suppressive soil determined by pyrosequencing analyses. Plant Dis 96:718–725
Ryu C, Murphy JF, Reddy MS et al (2007) A two-strain mixture of rhizobacteria elicits induction of systemic resistance against Pseudomonas syringae and cucumber mosaic virus coupled to promotion of plant growth on Arabidopsis thaliana. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:280
Saad MM, Eida AA, Hirt H (2020) Tailoring plant-associated microbial inoculants in agriculture: a roadmap for successful application. J Exp Bot 71:3761
Sagaram US, DeAngelis KM, Trivedi P et al (2009) Bacterial diversity analysis of Huanglongbing pathogen-infected citrus, using PhyloChip arrays and 16S rRNA gene clone library sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1566–1574
Saldajeno MGB, Masanori I, Mitsuro H (2012) Interaction between the plant growth-promoting fungus Phoma Sp. GS8-2 and the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungus Glomus Mosseae: impact on biocontrol of soil-borne diseases, microbial population, and plant growth. Australas. Plant Pathol 41:271–281
Sanmartín P, DeArauj A, Vasanthakumar A (2018) Melding the old with the new: trends in methods used to identify, monitor, and control microorganisms on cultural heritage materials. Microb Ecol 76:64–80
Savary S, Willocquet L, Pethybridge SJ et al (2019) The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat Ecol Evol 3:430–439
Schirawski J, Perlin M (2018) Plant–microbe interactions (2017)—the good, bad diverse. Int J Mol 19(5):1374
Schisler DA, Yoshioka M, Vaughan MM et al (2019) Nonviable biomass of biocontrol agent Papiliotrema flavescens OH 182.9 3C enhances growth of Fusarium graminearum and counteracts viable biomass reduction of Fusarium head blight. Biol Control 128:48–55
Schlemper TR, Leite MFA, Lucheta AR et al (2017) Rhizobacterial community structure differences among sorghum cultivars in different growth stages and soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93
Schlemper TR, Dimitrov MR, Gutierrez FAS et al (2018) Effect of Burkholderia tropica and Herbaspirillum frisingense strains on sorghum growth is plant genotype dependent. Peerj 6:e5346
Schreiner K, Hagn A, Kyselkova M et al (2010) Comparison of barley succession and take-all disease as environmental factors shaping the rhizobacterial community during take-all decline. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:4703–4712
Shade A (2017) Diversity is the question, not the answer. ISME J 11:1–6
Sharma R, Thakur RP, Senthilvel S et al (2011) Identification and characterization of toxigenic Fusaria associated with sorghum grain mold complex in India. Mycopathologia 171:223–230
Shiringani AL, Frisch M, Friedt W (2010) Genetic mapping of QTLs for sugar-related traits in a RIL population of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench Theor Appl Genet 121:323–336
Sivakumar N, Sathishkumar R, Selvakumar G et al (2020) Phyllospheric microbiomes: diversity, ecological significance, and biotechnological applications. In: Yadav A, Singh J, Rastegari A, Yadav N (eds) Plant Microbiomes for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Cham, pp 133–172
Stone BWG, Weingarten EA, Jackson CR (2018) The role of the phyllosphere microbiome in plant health and function. Annu Plan Rev 1:1–24
Sun PF, Fang WT, Shin LY et al (2014) Indole-3-acetic acid-producing yeasts in the phyllosphere of the carnivorous plant Drosera indica L. PLoS One 9(12):e114196
Szilagyi-Zecchin VJ, Adamoski D, Gomes RR et al (2016) Composition of endophytic fungal community associated with leaves of maize cultivated in South Brazilian field. Acta Microbiol Immunol 63:449–466
TeBeest D, Kirkpatrick T, Cartwright R (2004) Common and important diseases of grain Sorghum. In: Espinoza L, Kelley J (eds) Grain sorghum production handbook. University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service, USA, p 297
Thompson I, Bailey M, Fenlon J et al (1993) Quantitative and qualitative seasonal changes in the microbial community from the phyllosphere of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Plant Soil 150:177–191
Tivoli B, Banniza S (2007) Comparison of the epidemiology of ascochyta blights on grain legumes, in Ascochyta blights of grain legumes. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:59–76
Tripathi M, Singh DN, Vikram S et al (2018) Metagenomic approach towards bioprospection of novel biomolecule (s) and environmental bioremediation. Annu Res Rev Biol 22:1–12
Trivedi P, Duan Y, Wang N (2010) Huanglongbing, a systemic disease, restructures the bacterial community associated with citrus roots. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3427–3436
Tsolakidou M, Stringlis IA, Fanega-Sleziak N et al (2019) Rhizosphere-enriched microbes as a pool to design synthetic communities for reproducible beneficial outputs. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 95:138
Turbat A, Rakk D, Vigneshwari A et al (2020) Characterization of the plant growth-promoting activities of Endophytic Fungi isolated from Sophora flavescens. Microorganisms 8:683
Turner TR, James EK, Poole PS (2013) The plant microbiome. Genome Biol 14:1–10
van Elsas JD, Chiurazzi M, Mallon CA et al (2012) Microbial diversity determines the invasion of soil by a bacterial pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:1159–1164
Vanamala JKP, Massey AR, Pinnamaneni SR et al (2018) Grain and sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) serves as a novel source of bioactive compounds for human health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 58:2867–2881
Vorholt JA (2012) Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:828–840
Vorholt JA, Vogel C, Carlström CI, Müller DB et al (2017) Establishing causality: opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research. Cell Host Microbe 22:142–155
Wallace JG, Kremling KA, Kovar LL et al (2018) Quantitative genetics of the maize leaf microbiome. Phytobiomes J 2:208–224
Wei J, Ma W, Liu X, Xu J et al (2020) First report of leaf spot on Sorghum bicolor caused by Alternaria tenuissima in China. Plant Dis 104:2729–2729
Wille L, Messmer MM, Studer B et al (2019) Insights to plant–microbe interactions provide opportunities to improve resistance breeding against root diseases in grain legumes. Plant. Cell Environ 42:20–40
Xu S, Brockmoller T, Navarro-Quezada A et al (2017) Wild tobacco genomes reveal the evolution of nicotine biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:6133–6138
Xu L, Naylor D, Dong Z et al (2018) Drought delays development of the sorghum root microbiome and enriches for monoderm bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:4284–4293
Xu J, Jiang Y, Hu L et al (2019) First report of rough leaf spot of Sorghum caused by Ascochyta sorghi in China. Plant Dis 103:149–149
Yang H, Li J, Xiao Y et al (2017) An integrated insight into the relationship between soil microbial community and tobacco bacterial wilt disease. Front Microbiol 8:2179
Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J et al (2014) The SILVA and all-species living tree project (LTP) taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res 42:643–648
Yuan Y, Gao M (2015) Genomic analysis of a ginger pathogen Bacillus pumilus providing the understanding to the pathogenesis and the novel control strategy. Sci Rep 5:10259
Zegeye EK, Brislawn CJ, Farris Y et al (2019) Selection, succession, and stabilization of soil microbial consortia. Msystems 4:55–19
Zhang Y, Du BH, Jin Z et al (2011) Analysis of bacterial communities in rhizosphere soil of healthy and diseased cotton (Gossypium sp.) at different plant growth stages. Plant Soil 339:447–455
Zhang Z, Luo L, Tan X et al (2018) Pumpkin powdery mildew disease severity influences the fungal diversity of the phyllosphere. PeerJ 6:e4559
Zhang J, Liu Y, Zhang N et al (2019) NRT1 1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat Biotechnol 37:676–684
Zheng L, Abhyankar W, Ouwerling N et al (2016) Bacillus subtilis spore inner membrane proteome. J. Proteome Res 15:585–594
Zhou LS, Tang K, Guo SX (2018) The plant growth-promoting fungus (PGPF) Alternaria sp. A13 markedly enhances Salvia miltiorrhiza root growth and active ingredient accumulation under greenhouse and field conditions. Int J Mol Sci 19:270
Zhou D, Jing T, Chen Y et al (2019) Deciphering microbial diversity associated with Fusarium wilt-diseased and disease-free banana rhizosphere soil. BMC Microbiol 19:161
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support received for this work from the National Research Foundation, the Agricultural Research Council and the University of South Africa.
Availability of data
The nucleotide sequence data reported are available in the NCBI GenBank databases under the BioSample accessions number (SAMN13439454 – SAMN13439498) for bacteria and NCBI Biosample accessions (SAMN13439386 – SAMN13439430) for fungi, SRA accession number PRJNA614545.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KM, and DJGR contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection was done by KM and analysis was performed by KM and REP. Manuscript drafting and editing: KM, DJGR, REP and TPM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Anna Maria Pirttila
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Masenya, K., Thompson, G.D., Tekere, M. et al. Pathogen infection influences a distinct microbial community composition in sorghum RILs. Plant Soil 463, 555–572 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04875-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04875-3