1 Correction to: Philos Stud DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-1001-7

In the original publication of the article, footnote 17 was incorrectly published. The corrected footnote is given below.

Footnote 17:

Hellman (2001, pp. 193–6), Button and Walsh (2016, §2.3), and Ketland (ms.) have briefly discussed the permutation argument in the context of ante-rem structuralism. I will expand the argument and the structuralist’s possible responses. Hellman’s paper is the original source of the permutation argument in this context.