Abstract
Despite what you have heard over the years, the famous evil deceiver argument in Meditation One is not original to Descartes (1596–1650). Early modern meditators often struggle with deceptive demons. The author of the Meditations (1641) is merely giving a new spin to a common rhetorical device. Equally surprising is the fact that Descartes’ epistemological rendering of the demon trope is probably inspired by a Spanish nun, Teresa of Ávila (1515–1582), whose works have been ignored by historians of philosophy, although they were a global phenomenon during Descartes’ formative years. In this paper, I first answer the obvious question as to why previous early modernists have missed something so important as the fact that Descartes’ most famous publication relies on a well-established genre and that his deceiver argument bears a striking similarity to ideas in Teresa’s final work, El Castillo Interior (Interior Castle, 1588)? I discuss the meditative tradition at the end of which Descartes’ Meditations stands, present evidence to support the claim that Descartes was familiar with Teresa’s proposals, contrast their meditative goals, and make a point-by-point comparison between the meditative steps in Teresa’s Interior Castle and those in Descartes’ Meditations which constitute (what I call) their common deceiver strategy. My conclusion makes a case for a broader and more inclusive history of philosophy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Thanks to Roberta Ballarin, Heather Battaly, Jamie Tappenden, Raphaelle Debenedetti, Maria Berbara, and the Folger Library.
O’Neill’s great accomplishment was to take an imprecise map sketched by her feminist predecessors and add prominent landmarks drawn in precise detail. She then motivated her students, friends, and colleagues to use her revised map to explore ever more specific areas. See O’Neill (1998a, b). Many of us working on early modern women would not have done so without O’Neill’s philosophical, scholarly, and personal support.
Mercer (2014a).
Prominent historians of philosophy have ignored the works of women in this period. For example, Perler (2011) presents “the history” of the passions 1270–1670 without discussing the views of a single woman although they had much to say about the passions in the period.
The exercises were written 1522–1524, increasingly practiced by Jesuits, and formally approved by Pope Paul III in 1548.
For more on Descartes’ adroit use of the meditative genre, see Mercer (2014b).
Teresa of Ávila (1577). The Interior Castle is divided into “dwelling places” or main parts of the castle. Each dwelling place contains one or more chapters, each of which has several sections. Citations given here include dwelling place, chapter, section, and page number of the Kavanaugh and Rodriguez translation. So, I: 2, 9 (292)) is first dwelling place, second chapter, ninth section, p. 292.
Teresa and her works were not universally endorsed. Although Jesuits supported her beatification (including the influential Spanish scholastic, Francis Suarez (Fuente 1881, vol. 6, p. 278), some Catholic leaders argued that no woman could have written such a book and concluded that Teresa must have been helped by the devil (Slade 1995, p. 129).
An early translation of Teresa’s autobiography, La Vida, from Spanish into English includes a dedication to “Princess Henrietta-Maria of France, Queen of Great Britain, France and Ireland” who has committed herself to “protecting and enlarging the glory of an incomparable Saint, S. Teresa” (Teresa 1642).
There is much disagreement about how to interpret the main point and arguments in Meditation One. I ignore these complications here. For an overview of the debate see Newman (2014).
See the quotation from Augustine’s Confessions in Sect. 3.
References
Ariew, R. (1992). Descartes and scholasticism: The intellectual background to Descartes’ thought. In Cottingham (Ed.), Descartes: The Cambridge companion (pp. 58–91).
Ariew, R. (1999). Descartes and the last scholastics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Augustine, S. (1992). Confessions. (H. Chadwick, Ed., Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford’s World’s Classics.
Cassirer, E. (1932). Die Philosophie der Aufklärung. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag Hamburg.
Clarke, D. M. (2006). Descartes: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Angelis, B. (1615). Epistolae praepositorum generalium ad patres et fratres societatis Iesu. Rome: Collegio Romano.
de Borgia, F. (1620). The practise of Christian workes. Written in Spanish by the R. Father Francis Borgia, sometymes Duke of Gandia, and the third generall of the Society of Iesus. Together with a short rule, how to live well. Englished by a father of the same society. Whereunto are adioyned certaine pious meditations vpon the beades: translated also out of the Spanish. London.
Descartes, R. (1964–1976). Œuvres de Descartes (C. Adam, P. Tannery, Ed.) (Vols. 12). Paris: CNRS/Vrin.
Descartes, R. (1985–1891). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vols. 3) (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, & A. Kenny, Ed., Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deville, R. S. S. (1990). The seventeenth-century school of french spirituality. Vincentian Heritage Journal, 11(1), 17–28.
Digby, K. (1644). Two treatises in the one of which, the nature of bodies; in the other, the nature of mans soule is looked into: In way of discovery, of the immortality of reasonable soules. Paris: Gilles Blaizot.
Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. “Pierre De Bérulle - French Cardinal and Statesman.” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. http://www.britannica.com/biography/Pierre-de-Berulle.
Farrell, A. P. Trans. (1970). The Jesuit Ratio Studiorum of 1599. Detroit, MI: University of Detroit.
Fischer, K. (1854–1877). Geschichte der neueren Philosophie (Vols. 6). Stuttgart-Mannheim-Heidelberg.
Fischer, K. (1878). Geschichte der neueren Philosophie (3rd ed., Vol. 1). Munich: Springer.
Fuente, D. V. (1881). Obras de Santa Teresa de Jesus. In Compania de Impresores y Libreros del Reino (Vol. 6). Madrid.
Gaukroger, S. (1995). Descartes: An intellectual biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ghezzi, B. (2000). Voices of the saints. New York: Loyola Press. http://www.ignatianspirituality.com/ignatian-voices/16th-and-17th-century-ignatian-voices/st-francis-borgia-sj
Gilson, É. (1930). Études sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien. Vrin.
Gilson, É. (1932). L’esprit de la philosophie médiévale. Vrin.
Hatfield, G. (1985). Descartes’s meditations as cognitive exercises. Philosophy and Literature., 9(1), 41–58.
Howells, E. (2015). From late medieval to early modern: Assessing the theology of Pierre de Bérulle. In Louise Nelstrop & B. B. Onishi (Eds.), Mysticism in the French tradition: Eruptions from France (contemporary theological explorations in christian mysticism) (pp. 169–184). Abingdon: Routledge.
Leone, M. (2010). Saints and signs: A semiotic reading of conversion in early modern catholicism. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Mercer, C. (2001). Leibniz’s metaphysics: Its origins and development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mercer, C. (2014a). Prefacing the theodicy. In L. Jorgensen & S. Newlands (Eds.), Essays on the theodicy (pp. 13–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mercer, C. (2014b). The methodology of the meditations: Tradition and innovation. In D. Cunning CUP (Ed.), Cambridge companion to Descartes’ meditations (pp. 23–47).
Mersenne, M. (1634). Questions Inouyes; Questions Harmoniques; Questions Théologiques; Les Méchaniques De Galilée; Les Préludes De L’harmonie Universelle (pp. 69–72). Paris: Henry Guenon.
Newman, L. (2014). Descartes’ epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/descartes-epistemology/. Accessed June 1 2016.
O’Neill, E. (1998a). Disappearing ink: Early modern women philosophers and their fate in history. In J. Kourany (Ed.), Philosophy in a feminist voice (pp. 17–62). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
O’Neill, E. (1998b). In M. Ayers & D. Garber (Eds.), Cambridge history of 17th-century philosophy (Vol. II). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Perler, Dominik. (2011). Transformationen der Gefühle: Philosophische Emotionstheorien 1270-1670. Frankfurt: Fischer Wissenschaft.
Rorty, A. O. (1983). Experiments in philosophic genre: Descartes’ meditations. Critical Inquiry, 9(3), 545–564.
Rubidge, B. (1990). Descartes’s meditations and devotional meditations. Journal of the History of Ideas, 51, 27–49.
Schwickerath, R. Ratio studiorum. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12654a.htm. The Catholic Encyclopedia. Accessed on 10 Jan 2016.
Slade, C. (1995). St. Teresa of Ávila: Author of a Heroic Life. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Sturm, J. C. (1686). Philosophia Eclectica. Altdorf, Nuremberg.
Teresa of Ávila. (1577). In The collected works of St. Teresa of Ávila (Vols. 3) (K. Kavanaugh, O. Rodriguez 1976–1985, Ed., Trans.). Washington.
Teresa of Ávila. (1642). In The flaming hart or The life of the glorious S. Teresa, foundresse of the reformation, of the order of the All-Immaculate Virgin-Mother, our B. Lady, of Mount-Carmel (T. Matthew, Trans.). Antwerpe: Iohannes Meursius.
Vendler, Z. (1989). Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 19(2), 193–224.
Watt, J. R., & Rodgers, Jeffrey. (2009). The scourge of demons: possession, lust, and witchcraft in a seventeenth-century Italian convent. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mercer, C. Descartes’ debt to Teresa of Ávila, or why we should work on women in the history of philosophy. Philos Stud 174, 2539–2555 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0737-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0737-9