Skip to main content
Log in

The ontology of meanings

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In part 4 of Meaning, Expression, and Thought, Davis rejects what he calls Fregean ideational theories, according to which the meaning of an expression is an idea; and then presents his own account, which states that, e.g., the meaning of ‘Primzahl’ in German is the property of meaning prime number. Before casting doubt on the latter ontology of meanings, I come to Frege’s defence by pointing out that he was not an advocate of the position Davis named after him because Fregean senses are not lexical meanings and Fregean thoughts are not types of mental events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cf. Frege (1891, pp. 29, 31, 1892a, pp. 46–48, 54, 1892b, pp. 62f., 1918, pp. 4–7, 1979, pp. 119, 129, 131, 167f., 192, 194, 200, 206, 216, 225, 231–234, 243, 255). Frege mentions a further class of sentences expressing thoughts, namely, interrogative sentences of the yes/no-type like ‘Is 17 a prime number?’ (cf. 1918, p. 7, 1979, pp. 138f); and he says about subsentential expressions that their senses are parts of thoughts (cf. 1892b, p. 66, 1979, pp. 187, 190–193, 201, 207f., 225, 231–234, 243, 254f.).

  2. Cf. Church (1943, p. 301, 1956, p. 5), Carnap (1963, p. 897, 1964, p. 125).

  3. Cf. Burge (1977, p. 357, 1979, pp. 399–401), Künne (1982, pp. 50–52, 1983, pp. 198f., 1992, pp. 721–723). See also Baker and Hacker (1984, p. 131), Beaney (1996, pp. 208, 246), Recanati (1995, pp. 96f.), Segal (1995, pp. 22f).

  4. Geach wrongly translated ‘Wortlaut’ by ‘utterance’.

  5. Cf. Baker and Hacker (1984, p. 36), Dummett (1981, pp. 169, 367), Künne (1992), Segal (1995, pp. 22f.). Cf. also Künne (2003, pp. 277–279) on the ambiguity of the term ‘time-specification’.

  6. Cf. Frege (1918, pp. 13–18, 24–26, 1892b, pp. 59f., 1979, pp. 3f., 7, 130f., 133, 137, 143–145, 148, 167, 198).

  7. Cf. Frege (1918, pp. 5, 13, 17, 26, 1979, pp. 167, 206, 259).

  8. Cf. also Frege’s (1979, pp. 11, 47) distinction between judgements, i.e., acts of judging, and their contents; and Frege (1918, p. 7).

  9. Against the background of Davis’s expression theory of meaning, this implies that the meaning of e in L is the property of expressing the idea μ iff e means μ in L (cf. Davis 2003, p. 561). But this move is irrelevant to the following considerations.

  10. I would like to thank Wayne Davis, Wolfgang Künne and Mark Textor for their highly valuable comments on a precursor of this paper.

References

  • Baker, G. P., & Hacker, P. M. S. (1984). Frege: logical excavations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaney, M. (1996). Frege. Making sense. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1977). Belief De Re. Journal of Philosophy, 74, 338–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1979). Sinning against Frege. Philosophical Review, 88, 398–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1963). My conceptions of the logic of modalities. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 889–900). La Salle/Ill.: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1964). Meaning and necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, R. (1962). Propositions. In R. J. Butler (Ed.), Analytical philosophy (pp. 81–103). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. (1943). Carnap’s introduction to semantics. Philosophical Review, 52, 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. (1956). Propositions and sentences. In I. M. Bochenski et al. (Eds.), The problem of universals (pp. 1–11). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. A. (2003). Meaning, expression, and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. (1981). Frege. Philosophy of language (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1891). Function and concept. In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (3rd ed., pp. 21–41). Oxford: Blackwell 1992.

  • Frege, G. (1892a). On concept and object. In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (3rd ed., pp. 42–55). Oxford: Blackwell 1992.

  • Frege, G. (1892b). On sense and meaning. In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (3rd ed., pp. 56–78). Oxford: Blackwell 1992.

  • Frege, G. (1893). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik I, Jena: Hermann Pohle; repr. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft: Darmstadt 1962.

  • Frege, G. (1918). Thoughts. In G. Frege, Logical investigations (pp. 1–30) (P. Geach & R. H. Stoothoff, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1977.

  • Frege, G. (1979). Posthumous writings (H. Hermes et al., Eds.; P. Long & R. White, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1979.

  • Künne, W. (1982). Indexikalität, Sinn und propositionaler Gehalt. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 18, 41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künne, W. (1983). Abstrakte Gegenstände. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künne, W. (1992). Hybrid proper names. Mind, 101, 721–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künne, W. (2003). Conceptions of truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, L. (1967). Referring. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (1995). The communication of first person thoughts. In J. Biro & P. Kotatko (Eds.), Frege: Sense and reference one hundred years later (pp. 95–102). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, G. (1995). Truth and sense. In J. Biro & P. Kotatko (Eds.), Frege: Sense and reference one hundred years later (pp. 15–24). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1985). Skepticism and naturalism: Some varieties. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Siebel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siebel, M. The ontology of meanings. Philos Stud 137, 417–426 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9129-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9129-5

Keywords

Navigation