Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What is History for? Reply to Critics of The Dawn of Analysis

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boolos, G. (1975). On second-order logic. The Journal of Philosophy, LXXII(16), 509–528.

  • Cartwright, R. (1987).On the origins of Russell’s theory of descriptions. In Philosophical essays. Cambridge: MIT.

  • Moore, G. E. (1925), A defense of common sense. In Contemporary British Philosophy (2nd Series), edited by J. H. Muirhead.

  • Moore, G. E. (1939), Proof of an external world. Proceedings of the British Academy 25.

  • W. V. Quine (1960) Word and object MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • W. V. Quine (1970) Philosophy of logic Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1903). Principles of mathematics, 2nd ed. New York: Norton, originally published 1903.

  • Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14.

  • B. Russell (1914) Our knowledge of the external world George Allen and Unwin London

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1985). The philosophy of logical atomism. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court. Originally published in 1918.

  • Russell, B. (1993). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. New York: Dover. Originally published in 1919.

  • Sainsbury, M. (1979). Russell. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USC School of Philosophy, Mudd Hall of Philosophy, University of South California, 3709 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-0451, USA

    S. Soames

Authors
  1. S. Soames
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Soames.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soames, S. What is History for? Reply to Critics of The Dawn of Analysis. Philos Stud 129, 645–665 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-0016-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-0016-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation