Skip to main content
Log in

Rigid Designation and Anaphoric Theories of Reference

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few philosophers today doubt the importance of some notion of rigid designation, as suggested by Kripke and Putnam for names and natural kind terms. At the very least, most of us want our theories to be compatible with the most plausible elements of that account. Anaphoric theories of reference have gained some attention lately, but little attention has been given to how they square with rigid designation. Although the differences between anaphoric theories and many interpretations of the New Theory of reference are substantial, I argue that rigid designation and anaphoric theories can be reconciled with one another and in fact complement one another in important ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Berger (2002) Terms and Truth: Reference Direct and Anaphoric MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Brandom (1984) ArticleTitle‘Reference Explained Away’ The Journal of Philosophy 81 469–492 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2026268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Brandom (1994) Making It Explicit Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Brody (1977) ArticleTitle‘Kripke on Proper Names’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2 64–69

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Devitt (1981) Designation Columbia University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Grover N. Belnap J. Camp (1973) ArticleTitle‘A Prosentential Theory of Truth’ Philosophical Studies 27 73–125 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01209340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Kripke (1980) Naming and Necessity Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lance (1996) ArticleTitle‘Quantification, Substitution, and Conceptual Content’ Nous 30 IssueID4 481–507

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lange (1993) ArticleTitle‘Lawlikeness’ Nous 27 IssueID1 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Peacocke (1975) ‘Proper Names Reference and Rigid Designation’ Simon Blackburn (Eds) Meaning Reference and Necessity Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 109–132

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Putnam (1973) ArticleTitle‘Meaning and Reference’ The Journal of Philosophy 70 699–711 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2025079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975): ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’ , in Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2 (pp. 215–271), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • F. Recanati (1997) Direct Reference Blackwell Publishers Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1963): ‘Some Reflections on Language Games’, in Science, Perception and Reality, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Press, pp. 321–358.

  • Sellars, W. (1980): ‘Inference and Meaning’, in Pure Pragmatics and Possible Worlds: The Early Essays of Wilfrid Sellars, Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Co, 1980, pp. 261–286.

  • M. Wolf (2002) ArticleTitle‘The Curious Role of Natural Kind Terms’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 81–101 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0114.t01-1-00141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. Wolf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolf, M.P. Rigid Designation and Anaphoric Theories of Reference. Philos Stud 130, 351–375 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5748-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5748-2

Keywords

Navigation