Abstract
The nature of craft creativity has often been ignored in research which focuses on innovative and novel ideas and thought processes. This view of creativity casts the repetitive nature of craft as antithetical to the disruptive nature of genuine creativity. Drawing on combined enactivist and pragmatist accounts of habits and on a focused cognitive ethnography of a wooden bowl turner, this paper explores the nature of the constraints wrought by habitual action. Habitual action will be shown to be less repetitive than may be initially assumed because of the uncertainty inherent in working with both the wood which forms the initial material and the tools necessary to transform it. Rather, this paper proposes habitual learned movements as an important concept in a pragmatist-informed theory of creativity since they mark the skilled co-ordination of material, tool and maker, at once constraining and enhancing the creative craft process.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The qualitative nature of the data means that they are available only on reasonable request.
Notes
Although this is not to discount the subpersonal thinking which is the hallmark of habitual engagement with a changing world.
References
Alač, M. (2011). Handling digital brains: A laboratory study of multimodal semiotic interaction in the age of computers. MIT Press.
Atkinson, P. (2013). Ethnography and craft knowledge. Qualitative Sociology Review, IX(2), 56–63.
Baber, C., Chemero, A., & Hall, J. (2019). What the jeweller’s hand tells the jeweller’s brain: Tool use, creativity and embodied cognition. Philosophy & Technology, 32(2), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0292-0
Baldwin, J. M. (1894). Imitation: A chap. In the natural history of consciousness. Mind, 3, 26–55.
Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (2000). Putting ethnography to work: The case for a cognitive ethnography of design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0372
Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (2017). Cognitive psychology. In C. Willig, & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 572–588). SAGE.
Barandiaran, X. E., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2014). A genealogical map of the concept of habit. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00522
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.
Berliner, P. F. (1994). Thinking in jazz. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Brenner, M. (1980). The structure of action: Introduction. In M. Brenner (Ed.), The structure of action (pp. 1–27). Basil Blackwell Publisher.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE.
Camic, C. (1986). The matter of habit. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1039–1087.
Carruthers, P. (2011). Creative action in mind. Philosophical Psychology, 24(4), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.556609
Chaffin, R., Lemieux, A. F., & Chen, C. (2006). Spontaneity and creativity in highly practiced performance. In I. Delie`ge & G. A. Wiggins (Eds.), Musical creativity: Multidisciplinary research in theory and practice (pp. 200–218). Psychology Press.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd edition). Sage.
Christensen, W., Sutton, J., & McIlwain, D. J. F. (2016). Cognition in skilled action: Meshed control and the varieties of skill experience. Mind & Language, 31(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12094
Cohen, M. D. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization studies, 28(5), 773–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606077620
Collingwood, R. G. (1958). The principles of art (Vol. 11). Oxford University Press.
Dane, E. (2010). Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok579
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. Modern Library.
Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. Open Court.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Penguin.
Gauld, A., & Shotter, J. (1977). Human action and its psychological investigation. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.
Glǎveanu, V. P. (2012). Habitual creativity: Revising habit, reconceptualizing creativity. Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026611
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Creativity and folk art: A study of creative action in traditional craft. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 7(2), 140–154.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2017). Creativity in craft. In J. C. Kaufman, V. P. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains (pp. 616–632). Cambridge University Press.
Glaveanu, V. P. (2011). Is the lightbulb still on? Social representations of creativity in a Western context. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 21(1), 53–72.
Glăveanu, V. P., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). Creative experience: A non-standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1827606
Glăveanu, V. P., & Lahlou, S. (2012). Through the creator’s eyes: Using the subjective camera to study craft creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 152–162.
Glăveanu, V. P., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., de Biaisi, M. P., Desainte-Catherine, M., Georgsdottir, A., Guillou, K., Kurtag, G., Mouchiroud, C., Storme, M., Wojtczuk, A., & Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action: Findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Educational Psychology, 4, 1–14.
Hacking, I. (1982). Experimentation and scientific realism. Philsophical Topics, 13(1), 71–87.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. SAGE. http://www.philosophy.umd.edu/Faculty/pcarruthers/#
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
Hutto, D. D., & Robertson, I. (2019). Clarifying the character of habits: Understanding what and how they explain. In F. Caruna, & I. Testa (Eds.), Habit: Pragmaticts approaches from cognitive neuroscience to social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Ibáñez de Aldecoa, P., de Wit, S., & Tebbich, S. (2021). Can habits impede creativity by inducing fixation? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 683024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683024
Ingold, T. (2007). Walking the plank: Meditations on a process of skill. In J. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy: Towards an epistemological framework (Vol. 44, pp. 65–81). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.44-2670
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Dover.
Katz-Buonincontro, J., & Anderson, R. C. (2020). A review of articles using observation methods to study creativity in education (1980–2018). The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.385
Kilpinen, E. (2009). The habitual conception of action and social theory. Semiotica, 173(1/4), 99–128.
Kimmel, M., & Hristova, D. (2021). The Micro-genesis of Improvisational Co-creation. Creativity Research Journal, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1922197
Kristeller, P. O. (1951). The modem system of the arts. Journal of the History of Ideas, 12(4), 496–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707484
MacDougall, R. (1911). The system of habits and the system of ideas. Psychological Review, 18, 324–335.
Malafouris, L. (2014). Creative thinging: The feeling of and for clay. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(1), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.1.08mal
Negus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. Sage.
O’Connor, E. (2005). Embodied knowledge: The experience of meaning and the struggle towards proficiency in glassblowing. Ethnography, 6(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138105057551
Ormerod, T. C., & MacGregor, J. N. (2017). Enabling spontaneous analogy through heuristic change. Cognitive Psychology, 99, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.09.001
Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship (Revised ed., repr). Herbert Press.
Ramírez-Vizcaya, S., & Froese, T. (2019). The enactive approach to habits: New concepts for the cognitive science of bad habits and addiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00301
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
Ross, W. (2022). Creative ignorance: Unknowing through doing. In S. Arfini & L. Magnani (Eds.), Embodied, extended, ignorant minds: New studies on the nature of not-knowing (pp. 37–59). Synthese Library.
Ross, W., & Groves, M. (2023). Let’s just see what happens: A qualitative case study of risk and uncertainty in the creative process. Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.578
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Schwalbe, M. (2010). In search of craft. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510369086
Sennett, R. (2009). The craftsman. Penguin.
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.
Sullivan, S. (2000). Reconfiguring gender with John Dewey: Habit, bodies, and cultural change. Hypatia, 15(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2000.tb01078.x
Tantucci, V., & Di Cristofaro, M. (2020). Entrenchment inhibition: Constructional change and repetitive behaviour can be in competition with large-scale “recompositional” creativity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2019-0017
Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2009). Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x
Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2023). Insight in the kinenoetic field. In L. J. Ball & F. Vallée‐Tourangeau (Eds.), Routledge handbook of creative cognition. Routledge.
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & March, P. L. (2019). Insight out: Making creativity visible. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.409
Wood, W., & Rünger, D. (2016). Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417
Acknowledgements
This work would not have been possible without both the skill and the thoughts of Mike Groves and we thank him wholeheartedly for allowing us to be part of his making process. We would also like to thank Tom Ormerod for stimulating conversations which informed some of the thinking in this paper and Michael Kimmel for detailed comments on an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, W., Glăveanu, V. The constraints of habit: craft, repetition, and creativity. Phenom Cogn Sci (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-023-09902-5
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-023-09902-5