Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Albarella, C., & Donadio, M. (Eds.). (1998). Il controtransfert. Saggi Psicoanalitici [Countertransference. Psychoanalytical essays]. Naples: Liguori Editore.
Andreasen, N. C. (2007). DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: An example of unintended consequences. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33(1), 108–112.
Berrios, G. E. (2013). Per una nuova epistemologia della psichiatria [towards a new epistemology of psychiatry]. Rome: Giovanni Fioriti Editore.
Binswanger, L. (1924). Welche Aufgaben ergeben sick für die Psychiatrie aus den Fortschritten der neueren Psychologie? Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 91(1), 402–436.
Bolognini, S. (2002). L’empatia psicoanalitica [psychoanalytical empathy]. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Callieri, B. (1985). Antropologia e psichiatria clinica. Quaderni Italiani di Psichiatria, 4(3), 205–233.
Cohen, B. M. (2016). Embracing complexity in psychiatric diagnosis, treatment, and research. JAMA Psychiatry, 73, 1211–1212.
Deacon, B. J. (2013). The biomedical model of mental disorder: A critical analysis of its validity, utility, and effects on psychotherapy research. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 846–861.
Englebert, J., Monville, F., Valentiny, C., Mossay, F., Pienkos, E., & Sass, L. (2019). Anomalous experience of self and world: Administration of the EASE and EAWE scales to four subjects with schizophrenia. Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503117.
Fava, G. A., Rafanelli, C., & Tomba, E. (2012). The clinical process in psychiatry: A clinimetric approach. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 77, 173–178.
Fonzi, L., Pallagrosi, M., Picardi, A., D’Orazio, M., Zerella, M. P., Orso, L., et al. (2011). Clinician’s emotional resonance as investigation tool: development and preliminary validation of a questionnaire. Rivista di Psichiatria, 46, 250–264.
Freud, S. (1910). The future prospects of psycho-analytic therapy. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XI, pp. 141–151). London: Hogarth Press.
Fuchs, T. (2010). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in psychiatric diagnosis. Psychopathology, 43, 268–274.
Fuchs, T. (2015). Pathologies of intersubjectivity in autism and schizophrenia. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(1–2), 191–214.
Fuchs, T. (2017). Levels of empathy – Primary, extended and reiterated empathy. In V. Lux & S. Weigel (Eds.), Empathy. Epistemic problems and cultural-historical perspectives of a cross-disciplinary concept (pp. 27–47). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–486.
Fuchs, T., & Pallagrosi, M. (2018). Phenomenology of temporality and psychopathological dimensions. In M. Biondi, M. Pasquini, & A. Picardi (Eds.), Dimensional psychopathology (pp. 287–300). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
Galbusera, L., & Fellin, L. (2014). The intersubjective endeavor of psychopathology research: Methodological reflections on a second-person perspective approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1150.
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. New York: Routledge.
Guidano, V. F. (1987). Complexity of the self. A developmental approach to psychopathology and therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
Gupta, M., Potter, N., & Goyer, S. (2019). Diagnostic reasoning in psychiatry: Acknowledging an explicit role for Intersubjective knowing. Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology, 26(1), 49–64.
Jablensky, A. (2016). Psychiatric classifications: Validity and utility. World Psychiatry, 15(1), 26–31.
Jaspers, K. (1913). Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Berlin: Springer.
Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 4–12.
Kendler, K. (2017). DSM disorders and their criteria: How should they inter-relate? Psychological Medicine, 47(12), 2054–2060.
Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Aronson.
Lanzoni, S. (2006). Diagnosing with feeling: The clinical assessment of schizophrenia in early twentieth-century European psychiatry. In F. B. Alberti (Ed.), Medicine, emotion and disease, 1700–1950 (pp. 169–190). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Luft, S., & Schlimme, J. E. (2013). The phenomenology of intersubjectivity in Jaspers and Husserl: On the capacities and limits of empathy and communication in psychiatric praxis. Psychopathology, 46, 345–354.
McGorry, P. D. (2013). The next stage for diagnosis: Validity through utility. World Psychiatry, 12, 3.
Minkowski, E. (1927). La schizophrénie. Psychopathologie des schizoïdes et des schizophrènes. Paris: Payot.
Minkowski, E. (1933). Le temps vécu. Etudes phénoménologiques et psychopathologiques. Paris: Coll. de l’Evolution Psychiatrique.
Moskalewicz, M., Schwartz, M. A., & Gozé, T. (2018). Phenomenology of intuitive judgment: Praecox-feeling in the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Avant, 9(2), 63–74.
Nagar, M., Westen, D., & Nakash, O. (2018). Reliability of DSM and empirically derived prototype diagnosis for mood. anxiety and personality disorders. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 85, 8–14.
Neeleman, J. (1990). The nuclear symptom of schizophrenia and the praecoxfeeling. History of Psychiatry, 1990(1), 331–341.
Noll, R. (2018). Feeling and smelling psychosis: American alienism, psychiatry, prodromes and the limits of “category work”. History of the Human Sciences, 31(2), 22–41.
Nordgaard, J., Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2013). The psychiatric interview: Validity, structure and subjectivity. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 263, 353–364.
Nordgaard, J., & Henriksen, M. G. (2019). Phenomenological psychopathology and quantitative research. In G. Stanghellini, M. Broome, A. Raballo, A. Fernandez, P. Fusar-Poli, & R. Rosfort (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenological Psychopathology (pp. 941–951). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pallagrosi, M., & Fonzi, L. (2018). On the concept of praecox feeling. Psychopathology, 51, 353–361.
Pallagrosi, M., Fonzi, L., Picardi, A., & Biondi, M. (2014). Assessing clinician’s subjective experience during interaction with patients. Psychopathology, 47(2), 111–118.
Pallagrosi, M., Fonzi, L., Picardi, A., & Biondi, M. (2016). Association between clinician’s subjective experience during patient evaluation and psychiatric diagnosis. Psychopathology, 49(2), 83–94.
Pallagrosi, M., Picardi, A., Fonzi, L., & Biondi, M. (2018). Psychopathological dimensions and the clinician’s subjective experience. In M. Biondi, M. Pasquini, & A. Picardi (Eds.), Dimensional Psychopathology (pp. 267–286). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
Parnas, J. (2015). Differential diagnosis and current polythetic classification. World Psychiatry, 14, 3.
Parnas, J., & Zahavi, D. (2002). The role of phenomenology in psychiatric diagnosis and classification. In M. Maj, W. Gaebel, J. J. López-Ibor, & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Psychiatric diagnosis and classification (pp. 137–161). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Parnas, J., Møller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D. (2005). EASE: Examination of anomalous self-experience. Psychopathology, 38, 236–258.
Parnas, J., Sass, L. A., & Zahavi, D. (2013). Rediscovering psychopathology: The epistemology and phenomenology of the psychiatric object. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(2), 270–277.
Picardi, A. (2019). The two faces of first-rank symptoms. Psychopathology, 52, 221–231.
Picardi, A., Pallagrosi, M., Fonzi, L., & Biondi, M. (2017). Psychopathological dimensions and the clinician’s subjective experience. Psychiatry Research, 258, 407–414.
Rasmussen, A. R., Stephensen, H., & Parnas, J. (2018). EAFI: Examination of anomalous fantasy and imagination. Psychopathology, 51(3), 216–226.
Rümke, H. C. (1941). Das Kernsymptom der Schizophrenie und das 'Praecox Gefühl'. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 102, 168–175.
Sass, L., Pienkos, E., Skodlar, B., Stanghellini, G., Fuchs, T., Parnas, J., & Jones, N. (2017). EAWE: Examination of anomalous world experience. Psychopathology, 50, 10–54.
Schneider, K. (1936). Psychiatrische Vorlesungen für Ärzte (2nd ed.). Leipzig: Thieme.
Schultze-Lutter, F., Schmidt, S. J., & Theodoridou, A. (2018). Psychopathology—A precision tool in need of re-sharpening. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 446.
Sholokhova, S. (2019). Benefits and challenges of the phenomenological approach to the psychiatrist’s subjective experience: Impassivity, neutrality, and embodied awareness in the clinical encounter. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 26(4), E-83–E-96.
Southard, E. E. (1918). The empathic index in the diagnosis of mental diseases. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 13(4), 199–214.
Spillius, E., & O’Shaughnessy, E. (Eds.). (2012). Projective identification: The fate of a concept. New York: Routledge.
Stanghellini, G. (2007). The grammar of the psychiatric interview. Psychopathology, 40, 69–74.
Tansey, M. J., & Burke, W. F. (1989). Understanding countertransference: From projective identification to empathy. New York: Analytic Press.
Tellenbach, H. (1968). Geschmack und Atmosphäre. Medien menschlichen Elementarkontaktes. Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag.
Van Duppen, Z. (2017). The intersubjective dimension of schizophrenia. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 24(4), 399–418.
Varga, S. (2013). Vulnerability to psychosis, I-thou intersubjectivity and the praecox-feeling. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12(1), 131–143.
Wyrsch, J. (1946). Über die Intuition bei der Erkennung der Schizophrenen. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift, 46, 1173–1176.
Zahavi, D. (2001). Beyond empathy. Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Study, 8(5–7), 151–167.
Zahavi, D. (2004). Phenomenology and the project of naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 331–347.
Zahavi, D. (2014). Empathy and other-directed intentionality. Topoi, 33, 129–142.
Zahavi, D. (2019a). Phenomenology: The basics. New York: Routledge.
Zahavi, D. (2019b). Applied phenomenology: Why it is safe to ignore epoché. Continental Philosophical Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-019-09463-y.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fonzi, L., Pallagrosi, J., Picardi, A. et al. Exploring how the psychiatrist experiences the patient during the diagnostic evaluation: the Assessment of Clinician’s Subjective Experience (ACSE). Phenom Cogn Sci 21, 107–119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09729-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09729-y