Skip to main content
Log in

Language and development: paradoxical trajectories in Merleau-Ponty, Simondon, and Bergson

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. In the phenomenal field, objects behind my back can have a visible significance, freedom is always situated, and experience is motivated but not “caused.” (Merleau-Ponty 2012, Introduction)

  2. Merleau-Ponty’s position here is inspired by Husserl’s discussion of language in “On the Origin of Geometry” fragment. I am arguing, however, that Merleau-Ponty’s intent is to show language as a moving trajectory of sense, not a region of ideal objectivities, as is primarily the case in Husserl’s analysis. (My thanks to an anonymous reviewer for suggesting that this connection be made explicit.)

  3. To foreshadow Simondon’s language, which will be discussed below, this “vague fever” is a way of understanding the concept of the “metastable equilibrium.”

  4. Due to space limitations, I offer merely a brief presentation of Simondon’s complex, and relatively unknown, philosophical contribution so as to identify its connection to the paradoxical logic of expression and its potential conceptual contribution to rethinking trajectories of development. For more extensive introductions to his work, see: Barthélémy 2008; Chabot 2013; Combes 2013; De Boever et al. 2012, and Landes 2013, 22–4. For some important connections between Merleau-Ponty and Simondon, see Guchet 2001a, b.

  5. This notion of “motivation” alludes to Merleau-Ponty’s (2012) phenomenological description of experience as resisting traditional structures of linear causality (50–51; see also, Landes 2013, 84).

  6. This notion of dephasing, by which the metastable pre-individual deploys itself into individual phases, bears a certain productive resonance with Evan Thompson’s (2007) use of Petitot’s term “symmetry-breaking” (71). For a discussion of this notion, see Moss Brender (2013).

  7. See, for instance, Bergson (2001), xix; or again 131.

References

  • Barthélémy, J.-H. (2008). Simondon ou l’encyclopédisme génétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1998). Creative evolution. Arthur Miller, Trans. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (2001). Time and free will. F.L. Pogson, Trans. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabot, P. (2013). The philosophy of Simondon: Between technology and individuation. A. Krefetz, with G. Kirkpatrick, Trans. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes, M. (2013). Gilbert Simondon and the philosophy of the transindividual. T. LaMarre, Trans. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boever, A., Murrary, A., Roffe, J., & Woodward, A. (Eds.). (2012). Gilbert Simondon: Being and technology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guchet, X. (2001a). Merleau-Ponty, Simondon et le problème d’une ‘axiomatique des science humaines’. Chiasmi International, 3, 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guchet, X. (2001b). Théorie du lien social, technologie et philosophie. Simondon lecteur de Merleau-Ponty. Les Études Philosophiques, 57(2), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (2010). The mirage of a space between nature and nurture. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. (2013). Merleau-Ponty and the paradoxes of expression. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). On the phenomenology of language. (R. McCleary, Trans.). In Signs (84–97). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996a). Cézanne’s doubt. In G. A. Johnson (Ed.), The Merleau-Ponty aesthetics reader (pp. 59–75). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996b). Indirect language and the voices of silence. In G. A. Johnson (Ed.), The Merleau-Ponty aesthetics reader (pp. 76–120). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Course notes: Husserl at the limits of phenomenology. (J. O’Neill and L. Lawlor, Trans.) In L. Lawlor & B. Bergo (Eds.), Husserl at the limits of phenomenology (pp. 11–89). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception. D. Landes, Trans. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss Brender, N. (2013). Sense-making and symmetry-breaking: Merleau-Ponty, cognitive science, and dynamic systems theory. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy, 17(2), 246–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (1992). The genesis of the individual. (M. Cohen & S. Kwinter, trans.) In J. Crary & S. Kwinter (Eds.), Incorporations. New York: Zone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald A. Landes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Landes, D.A. Language and development: paradoxical trajectories in Merleau-Ponty, Simondon, and Bergson. Phenom Cogn Sci 16, 597–607 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9522-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9522-2

Keywords

Navigation