Abstract
The topographic threshold is based on the power relationship between area and slope and is widely applied in gully-erosion research; however, this relationship requires further testing. Accordingly, the Alamarvdasht Lamerd and Fadagh Larestan regions in Fars Province, Iran, were selected as case studies to explore the topographic threshold for gullies. Thirty active gullies were identified in each study area during field surveys, and data describing land use and land cover, drainage areas, slope, and the physical and chemical properties of the soils were assembled. Multivariate analysis was conducted using SPSS to determine the effects of these factors. Using the power relationship between the catchment area and slope for each gully, the analyses explored critical controls for gully development. The results showed that surface runoff was the most significant effective factor for gullies in the study areas. Sparse ground cover, fine-textured soils, and inappropriate land use contribute to gully development. The results suggest that the relationship between slope and drainage area in the Fadagh Larestan case study is S = 0.0192 A−0.159 for gully headcut areas and S = 0.0181 A−0.258 at gully outlets. The corresponding values of the exponent β at the gully headcuts and outlets at Fadagh were − 0.15, and −0.25, respectively. The corresponding relationships for gullies in the Alamarvdasht Lamerd area for the gully headcuts and outlets were S = 0.0143 A− 0.061 and S = 0.0073 A−0. 18, respectively, with β values of − 0.06 and − 0.18. This study provides a basis for determining the thresholds for initiating gully development. Analyses of the effective factors provide clues to improve the management of bare lands to prevent the initiation of gully erosion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmadi H (1999) Applied Geomorphology, Volume 1 water erosion, Tehran University Publications, 688
Boardman J (1992) Current erosion on the South Downs: implications for the past. In: Bell M, Boardman J (eds) Past and Present Soil Erosion. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 9–19
Casalí J, Loizu J, Campo MA, De Santisteban LM, Álvarez-Mozos J (2006) Accuracy of methods for field assessment of rill and ephemeral gully erosion. CATENA 67(2):128–138
Castillo C, Gómez JA (2016) A century of gully erosion research: urgency, complexity and study approaches. Earth Sci Rev 160:300–319
Crouch R, Novruzzi T (1989) Threshold conditions for rill initiation on a vertisol, Gunnedah, N.S.W. Australia, Catena. 10:101–110
Descroix L, Barrios JG, Viramontes D, Poulenard J, Anaya E, Esteves M, Estrada J (2008) Gully and sheet erosion on subtropical mountain slopes: their respective roles and the scale effect. CATENA 72(3):325–339
Desmet PJJ, Poasen J, Govers G, andaele K.V, (1999) Importance pf slope gradient and contributing area for optimal prediction of initiation and trajectory of ephemeral gullies. CATENA 37:377–392
Dietrich W.E, Wilson C.J, Montgomery D.R, McKean J (1993) Analysis of erosion thresholds, channel network, and landscape morphology using a digital terrain model. Journal of Geology. vol. 101.
Evans R (1980) Mechanics of water erosion and their spatial and temporal controls: an empirical view point. In M.J.Kirkby and R.P.C. Morganeds.. Soil erosion, Chichester, Wiley, 109–128.
Frankl A, Poesen J, Haile M, Deckers J, Nyssen J (2013) Quantifying long-term changes in gully networks and volumes in dryland environments: the case of Northern Ethiopia. Geomorphology 201:254–263
Gayen A, Pourghasemi HR, Saha S, Keesstra S, Bai S (2019) Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms. Sci Total Environ 668:124–138
Horton Robert E (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology." Geological society of America bulletin 56.3 (1945): 275–370.
Ibáñez J, Ruiz-Ramos M (2006) A mathematical comparison of classification structures: the case of the USDA soil taxonomy. Eurasian Soil Sci 39(7):712–719
Kukal S, Matharu G.S (2002) Behaviour of gully erosion in relation to catchment characteristics in foothills of lower Shivaliks. In: 17. World congress of soil science, 14–21 August 2002. Bangkok, Thailand
Monsieurs E, Dessie M, Verhoest NE, Poesen J, Adgo E, Deckers J, Nyssen J (2016) Impact of draining hilly lands on runoff and on-site erosion: a case study from humid Ethiopia. Earth Surf Proc Land 41(4):513–525
Montgomery D, Dietrich W (1988) Where do channels begin? Nature 336:232–234
Morgan RPC, Mnomezulu D (2003) Threshold conditions for initiation of valley-side gullies in middle veld of Swaziland. CATENA 50:401–414
Morgan R.P.C (1995) Soil Erosion and Conservation, Longman, 198p.
Nachtergaele J, Poesen J (2001) The Value of a physically based model versus an empirical approach in the prediction of ephemeral gully erosion for loess-derived soils. Geomorphology 40:237–252
Nachtergaele J, Poesen J, Sidorchuk A, Torri D (2002) Prediction of concentrated flow width in ephemeral gully channels. Hydrol Process 16(10):1935–1953
Nanson GC, Erskine WD (1988) Episodic changes in channels and floodplains on coastal rivers in New South Wales. In: Warner RF (ed) Fluvial Geomorphology of Australia. Academic Press Australia, Marrickville, NSW, pp 201–221
Oliveira-Filho AT, Vilela EA, Carvalho DA, Gavilanes ML (1994) Effects of soils and topography on the distribution of tree species in a tropical riverine forest in south-eastern Brazil. J Trop Ecol 10(4):483–508
Patton PC, Schumm SA (1975) Gully erosion, Northwestern Colorado: a threshold phenomenon. Geology 3(2):88–90
Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G, Valentin C (2003) Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs. CATENA 50:91–133
Rossi M, Torri D, Santi E (2015) Bias in topographic thresholds for gully heads. Nat Hazards 79(1):51–69
Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67(5):597–646
Sidorchuk A (1998) A dynamic model of gully erosion. In Modelling Soil Erosion by Water (pp. 451–460). Springer, Berlin
Soufi M (2002) Characteristics and causes of gully erosion in Iran. 12th ISCO Conference, Beijing, China
Svoray T, Markovitch H (2009) Catchment scale analysis of the effect of topography, tillage direction and unpaved roads on ephemeral gully incision. Earth Surface Processes Landforms J British Geomorphol Res Group 34(14):1970–1984
Vandaele K, Govers J, Wesemeal B (1996) Geomorphic threshold conditions for ephemeral gully incision. Geomorphology 16(2):161–173
Vandekechove L, Poesen J, Oostwoud Wijdenes D, Nachtengaele J, Kosmas CM, Roxd T, De Figueiredo J (2000) Thresholds for gully initiation and sedimentation in Mediterranean Europe. Earth Surface Processes Land Forms 25:1201–1220
Vandekerckhov L, Poesen J, Oostwoud WD, Rigveiredo T (1998) Topographical thersholds for ephemeral gully initiation in intensively cultivated areas of the Mediterranean. CATENA 33:271–292
Vanwalleghem T, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Deckers J (2003) Characteristics and controlling factor on old gullies under forest in a temperate humid climate: a case study from the Meerdaal forest Central Belgium. Geomorphology 56:15–29
Vanwalleghem T, Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G (2005) Characteristics, controlling factors and importance of deep gullies under cropland on loess-derived soils. Geomorphology 69:76–91
Walkley A, Black TA (1934) An examination of the Dehigaroff method for determining organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zare, M., Soufi, M., Nejabat, M. et al. The topographic threshold of gully erosion and contributing factors. Nat Hazards 112, 2013–2035 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05254-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05254-6