Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of the source parameters of the Nepal earthquake from strong motion data

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kathmandu and its surrounding region were rocked recently by a devastating earthquake on April 25, 2015. This is the largest earthquake that has occurred in this region since the past eight decades. This earthquake was recorded on strong motion stations located about 470–522 km away from its epicenter. Records of accelerographs from these stations have been used to determine the location of this earthquake using hypo71 algorithm given by Lee and Lehr (HYPO71, a computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude and first motion pattern of local earthquakes. US Geological Survey Open file report, 100, 1975). The recorded accelerograms have been corrected for site effects using site amplification curve obtained from ambient seismic noise recorded at each station. Site effect has been computed using H/V ratio method given by Nakamura (Q Rep RTRI 30(1):25–33, 1989) using ambient noise data. The corrected record is further used to obtain source displacement spectra. The source spectrum obtained from strong motion data is compared with theoretical source spectrum obtained from Brune’s (J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009, 1970) model for the horizontal components. The long-term flat level and corner frequency from source displacement spectra are used to calculate stress drop, source radius and seismic moment of this earthquake. The present study indicates that the Nepal earthquake originated 12.0 km below the epicenter located at 27.93°N, 84.70°E. The source radius, stress drop and seismic moment of this earthquake estimated from source displacement spectra are 44.13 ± 3.85 km, 18.68 ± 5.93 bars and 3.53 ± 0.28 × 1027 dyne cm, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1995) Ground motion relations for Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1998) Evaluation of models for earthquakes source spectra in Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:917–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatwright J, Choy G (1992) Acceleration source spectra anticipated for large earthquakes in Northeastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82:582–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motions based on Seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (1987) Stochastic prediction of ground motion spectral response parameters at hard sites in Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:440–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB (1991) Estimation of ground motion at deep soil sites Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:2167–2185

    Google Scholar 

  • Bour M, Fouissac D, Dominique P, Martin C (1998) On the use of micro tremor recordings seismic microzonation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 17:465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN (1971) Corrections. J Geophys Res 76:5002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEDIM Report 3, Nepal Earthquakes (2015) CEDIM Forensic Disaster Analysis Group, CATDAT and Earthquake-Report.com

  • Frankel A, Mueller C, Barnhard T, Perkins D, Leyendecker E, Dickman N, Hanson S, Hopper M (1996) National seismic hazard maps, June 1996, U.S. Geological Survey Open 96-532

  • Gitterman Y, Zaslavsky Y, Shapira A, Shtivelman V (1996) Empirical site response evaluations: case studies in Israel. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 15(7):447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddon R (1996) Earthquake source spectra in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1300–1313

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC (1982) fmax. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:1867–1879

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, McGuire RK (1981) The character of high frequency ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2071–2095

    Google Scholar 

  • Housner GW, Jennings PC (1964) Generation of artificial earthquakes. Proc ASCE 90:113–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain AK, Singh S, Manickavasagam RM (2002) Himalayan collision tectonics. Gondwana Research Group Memoir No. 7, 114 pp

  • Khattri KN (1987) Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along the Himalayan Plate boundary. Tectonophysics 138:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D (2005) Estimation of crustal Qβ in the Ganga basin using teleseismic broadband SH wave for the 1988 Nepal India border earthquake. J Asian Earth Sci 25:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Sarkar I, Sriram V, Khattri KN (2005) Estimation of the source parameters of the Himalaya earthquake of October 19, 1991, average effective shear wave attenuation parameters and local site effects from accelerograms. Tectonophysics 407:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai SP (1982) Statistical characterization of strong motions using power spectral density. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:259–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee WHK, Lehr JC (1975) HYPO71, a computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude, and first motion pattern of local earthquakes. U.S. Geological Survey Open file report, 100

  • Leech ML, Singh S, Jain AK, Klemperer SL, Manickavasagam RM (2005) The onset of India-Asia continental collision: early, steep subduction required by the timing of UHP metamorphism in the western Himalaya. Earth Planet Sci Lett 234(1–2):83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lermo J, Chavez-Garcia FJ (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am 8:1574–1594

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavian A, Sasatani T (1996) S-wave spectra from strong motion seismograms: source parameters and site response. Geophysics 10:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK, Becker AM, Donovan NC (1984) Spectral estimates of shear waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:2167–2185

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using micro tremor on the ground surface. Q Rep RTRI 30(1):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogoshi M, Igarashi T (1971) On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor—part 2. J Seismol Soc Jpn 24:26–40 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1983) A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion, 1, description of the model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:693–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Paudyal YR, Yatabe R, Bhandary NP, Dahal RK (2012) A study of local amplification effect of soil layers on ground motion in the Kathmandu Valley using microtremor analysis. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 11:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff LJ (1999) Dynamic stress drop of recent earthquakes: variations within subduction zones. Pure Appl Geophys 154:409–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seekins L, Wennerberg CL, Marghereti L, Liu HP (1996) Site amplification at five locations in San Francisco, California: a comparison of S waves, codas, and microtremors. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:627–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Ordaz M, Dattatrayam RS, Gupta HK (1999) A spectral analysis of the 21 May 1997, Jabalpur, India, earthquake (Mw = 5.8) and estimation of ground motion from future earthquakes in the Indian shield region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1620–1630

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Garcia D, Pacheco JF, Valenzuala R, Bansal BK, Dattatryam RS (2004) Q of the Indian Shield. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1564–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinozuka M, Sato Y (1967) Simulation of non stationary random processes. Proc ASCE 93:11–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriram V, Khattri KN (1997) A study of source spectrum, site amplifications, response spectra, Fourier Spectra and peak ground accelerations from the strong ground motion data of the Uttarkashi earthquake. Curr Sci 72:728–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason HR, Sharma ML (2000) Source parameters study of local earthquakes in the Garhwal Himalaya region based on the digital broad band data. In: 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Sunday 30 January–Friday 4 February 2000, paper 1776

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and source displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin A (2006) Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history and forehand sedimentation. Earth Sci Rev 76:1–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu G, Khattri KN, Anderson JG, Brune JN, Zeng Y (1995) Strong ground motion from the Uttarkashi, Himalaya, India, Earthquake: comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:31–50

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are sincerely thankful to the Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, for supporting the research reported in this paper. Strong motion data recorded by the network of accelerographs installed in the Kumaun region under the major research project sponsored by Ministry of Earth Sciences and another network operated by Department of Earthquake Engineering under Ministry of Earth Sciences, Govt. of India-funded project, were used in this work. The work presented in this paper is an outcome of the sponsored project from the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, Grant No. MoES-800-ESD/2014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monu Tomer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, A., Tomer, M., Lal, S. et al. Estimation of the source parameters of the Nepal earthquake from strong motion data. Nat Hazards 83, 867–883 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2351-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2351-8

Keywords

Navigation