Abstract
Beowulf (2007), the film directed by Robert Zemeckis, retells the story in the Old English epic Beowulf with a shifting of perspective. While the epic looks at the conflict between Beowulf and Grendel from a patriarchal vantage point, the film offers a view of things from Grendel’s Mother’s perspective. In the film Grendel represents the return of the repressed violating the order of the symbolic in Heorot. Thus, Grendel’s Mother appears as the subversive heroine who resists the humanizing/castrating elements in the symbolic and stands for the unsymbolised cause of desire. In the course of the film, she metamorphoses into the incarnation of the (m)Other, the discourse of the unconscious. The Kings, in the aftermath of their encounter with the (m)Other, betray what they represent in the epic and this time the roles are reversed as in their case the (m)Other conquers the representative of the paternal metaphor. In such a context, the film makes the (m)Other central to its account of culture and society, and it evacuates the male rationality and control in its patriarchal discourse. Due to the emphasis put on the (m)Other and the bankruptcy of the paternal metaphor, the internal and external otherness, and how the internal otherness determines the course of things in the symbolic, this article aims to offer a psychoanalytical reading of the film using Lacanian ideas as the conceptual backcloth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In Lacanian epistemology, the Other has a double nature as “the Other as both ‘inside’ and ‘outside’; as both ‘discourse of the unconscious’ and the social substance” (Hook 2008:57). To avoid any conceptual confusion the first will be referred to as the (m)Other and the second as the shared Other or simply as the Other.
The other adaptations are The 13th Warrior (1999) directed by John McTiernan, Beowulf (1999) directed by Graham Baker, Beowulf and Grendel (2005) directed by Sturla Gunnarson, and Outlander (2008) directed by Howard McCain.
References
Arendt, P. (2007). Children’s author Michael Morpurgo on Beowulf. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/film/2007/nov/20/booksforchildrenandteenagers.poetry. Accessed November 12, 2017.
Auld, F. (2011). Beowulf’s broken bodies. Literature Compass, 8(7), 416–422.
Avary, R. (2007). Foreword. In G. Gaiman & R. Avary (Eds.), Beowulf: The script book (pp. 3–13). New York: Harper.
Berzins, A. (2004).The challenge of an adaptation. Retrieved from http://www.beowulfandgrendel.com/the-challenge-of-an-adaptation/. Accessed November 12, 2007.
Bradshaw, P. (2007). Oi, dragon. Over ‘ere!: Ray Winstone is buff, sleek and totally unrecognisable as Beowulf in this wildly silly CGI epic. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/film/2007/nov/16/actionandadventure.animation. Accessed November 12, 2017.
Chang, J. (2007). Beowulf director Robert Zemeckis delivers a muscular, sometimes stirring but ultimately soulless reinterpretation. Retrieved from http://variety.com/2007/film/awards/beowulf-4-1200554643/. Accessed November 12, 2017.
Ebert, R. (2007). Beowulf. Retrieved from https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/beowulf-2007. Accessed November 12, 2017.
Elliott, A. (2002). Psychoanalytic theory (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave.
George, J. A. (2010). Beowulf (A reader’s guide to essential criticism). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave.
Goldsmith, M. (1970). The mode and meaning of ‘Beowulf’. London: The Athlone.
Gulley, A. (2014). “What we need is a hero”: Beowulf in a post-9/11 world. The Journal of Popular Culture, 47(4), 800–816.
Heaney, S. (2000). Introduction. In S. Heaney (Trans.). Beowulf: An illustrated edition (pp. 7–24). New York, NY: Norton.
Hodapp, W. F. (2010). “No hie fæder cunnon”: But twenty-first century filmmakers do. Essays in Medieval Studies, 26, 101–108.
Hook, D. (2008). Absolute other: Lacan’s ‘big Other’ as adjunct to critical social psychological analysis? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 51–73.
Homer, S. (2005). Jacques Lacan. London and New York: Routledge.
Jones, C. (2010). From Heorot to Hollywood: Beowulf in its third millennium. In D. Clark & N. Perkins (Eds.), Anglo-Saxon and the modern imagination (pp. 13–29). Cambridge: DS Brewer.
Lacan, J. (1981). The language of the self the function of language in psychoanalysis (Trans.: A. Wilden). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lacan, J. (1992). In J. A. Miller (Ed.), The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII: The ethics of psychoanalysis, 1959–1960 (Trans.: D. Porter). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Lacan, J. (2006). Écrits (1st complete edition in English) (Trans.: B. Fink). New York: W.W. Norton.
Laurent, É. (2006). Symptom and discourse. In J. Clemens & R. Grig (Eds.), Reflections on seminar XVII (pp. 229–263). Durham: Duke University Press.
Norris, R. (2011). Resistance to genocide in the postmodern Beowulf. Literature Compass, 8(7), 435–438.
North. R. (2007). Poetry in motion? Time Out. http://www.time-out.com/film/features/show-feature/3815/Dr_Richard_North_on-Beowulf-.html. Accessed November 12, 2017.
Osmond, A. (2008). Beowulf. Sight and Sound, 1, 61–62.
Ragland-Sullivan, E. (1987). Jacques Lacan and the philosophy of psychoanalysis. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Risden, E. L. (2013). A Freud complex and the problem of Beowulf in the film. In N. Haydock & E. L. Risden (Eds.), Beowulf on film: Adaptations and variations (pp. 1–27). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Sarup, M. (1992). Jacques Lacan. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Schipper, B. (2011). All talk: Robert Zemeckis’s Beowulf, Wealtheow, and Grendel’s mother. Literature Compass, 8(7), 423–426.
Seitz, M. Z. (2007). The camera takes over. Retrieved from ttps://www.slantmagazine.com/house/article/the-camera-takes-over-beowulf. Accessed November 12, 2017.
Silverstein, M. (1993). Harold Pinter and the language of cultural power. London: Associated University Press.
Traidl, V. (2016). Telling tales about Beowulf: The poem and the films. Munich: Herbert UtzVerlag.
Zemeckis, R, et al. (Producer), & Zemeckis, R. (Director). (2007). Beowulf [Motion capture]. United States: Paramount Pictures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birlik, N. Hermeneutics of Lack of Lack and the Dyad of the (m)Other and the Shared Other, in Zemeckis’s Beowulf. Neophilologus 102, 241–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-018-9552-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-018-9552-1