Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Concurrent intrathecal methotrexate and liposomal cytarabine for leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors: a retrospective cohort study

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from solid tumors is typically a late manifestation of systemic cancer with limited survival. Randomized trials comparing single agent intrathecal methotrexate to liposomal cytarabine have shown similar efficacy and tolerability. We hypothesized that combination intrathecal chemotherapy would be a safe and tolerable option in solid tumor LM. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of combination IT chemotherapy in solid tumor LM at a single institution between April 2010 and July 2012. In addition to therapies directed at active systemic disease, each subject received IT liposomal cytarabine plus IT methotrexate with dexamethasone premedication. Patient characteristics, survival outcomes and toxicities were determined by systematic chart review. Thirty subjects were treated during the study period. The most common cancer types were breast 15 (50 %), glioblastoma 6 (20 %), and lung 5 (17 %). Cytologic clearance was achieved in 6 (33 %). Median non-glioblastoma overall survival was 30.2 weeks (n = 18; range 3.9–73.4), and did not differ significantly by tumor type. Median time to neurologic progression was 7 weeks (n = 8; range 0.9–57), with 10 subjects (56 %) experiencing death from systemic disease without progression of LM. Age less than 60 was associated with longer overall survival (p = 0.01). Six (21 %) experienced grade III toxicities during treatment, most commonly meningitis 2 (7 %). Combination IT chemotherapy was feasible in this small retrospective cohort. Prospective evaluation is necessary to determine tolerability, the impact on quality of life and neurocognitive outcomes or any survival benefit when compared to single agent IT chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kesari S, Batchelor TT (2003) Leptomeningeal metastases. Neurol Clin 21(1):25–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke JL, Perez HR, Jacks LM, Panageas KS, Deangelis LM (2010) Leptomeningeal metastases in the MRI era. Neurology 74(18):1449–1454

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balm M, Hammack J (1996) Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis presenting features and prognostic factors. Arch Neurol 53(7):626–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA (1997) Prognostic significance of coexistent bulky metastatic central nervous system disease in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Arch Neurol 54(11):1364–1368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chamberlain MC, Corey-Bloom J (1991) Leptomeningeal metastases: 111indium-DTPA CSF flow studies. Neurology 41(11):1765–1769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Omuro AM, Lallana EC, Bilsky MH, DeAngelis LM (2005) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis. Neurology 64(9):1625–1627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin N, Dunn IF, Glantz M et al (2011) Benefit of ventriculoperitoneal cerebrospinal fluid shunting and intrathecal chemotherapy in neoplastic meningitis: a retrospective, case-controlled study. J Neurosurg 115(4):730–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grossman SA, Finkelstein DM, Ruckdeschel JC, Trump DL, Moynihan T, Ettinger DS (1993) Randomized prospective comparison of intraventricular methotrexate and thiotepa in patients with previously untreated neoplastic meningitis. eastern cooperative oncology group. J Clin Oncol 11(3):561–569

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glantz MJ, Jaeckle KA, Chamberlain MC et al (1999) A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal sustained-release cytarabine (DepoCyt) to intrathecal methotrexate in patients with neoplastic meningitis from solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 5(11):3394–3402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bokstein F, Lossos A, Siegal T (1998) Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: a comparison of two prospective series treated with and without intra-cerebrospinal fluid chemotherapy. Cancer 82(9):1756–1763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boogerd W, van den Bent MJ, Koehler PJ et al (2004) The relevance of intraventricular chemotherapy for leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer: a randomised study. Eur J Cancer 40(18):2726–2733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Recht L et al (1998) High-dose intravenous methotrexate for patients with nonleukemic leptomeningeal cancer: is intrathecal chemotherapy necessary? J Clin Oncol 16(4):1561–1567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carrick S, Parker S, Thornton CE, Ghersi D, Simes J, Wilcken N (2009) Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003372.pub3

  14. Ferreri AJ, Reni M, Foppoli M et al (2009) High-dose cytarabine plus high-dose methotrexate versus high-dose methotrexate alone in patients with primary CNS lymphoma: a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet 374(9700):1512–1520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hitchins RN, Bell DR, Woods RL, Levi JA (1987) A prospective randomized trial of single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in meningeal carcinomatosis. J Clin Oncol 5(10):1655–1662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Groves MD, DeGroot J, Loghin M et al (2011) A phase I study of temozolomide and intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in patients with neoplastic meningitis. Neuro-oncology 13:43

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK, Glantz MJ (2009) Neoplastic meningitis-related prognostic significance of the karnofsky performance status. Arch Neurol 66(1):74–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drappatz J, Batchelor TT (2007) Leptomeningeal neoplasms. Curr Treat Options Neurol 9(4):283–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim DY, Lee KW, Yun T et al (2003) Comparison of intrathecal chemotherapy for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis of a solid tumor: methotrexate alone versus methotrexate in combination with cytosine arabinoside and hydrocortisone. Jpn J Clin Oncol 33(12):608–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chamberlain MC (2012) Neurotoxicity of intra-CSF liposomal cytarabine (DepoCyt) administered for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis: a retrospective case series. J Neurooncol 109(1):143–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JY, Kim ST, Nam DH, Lee JI, Park K, Kong DS (2011) Leukoencephalopathy and disseminated necrotizing leukoencephalopathy following intrathecal methotrexate chemotherapy and radiation therapy for central nerve system lymphoma or leukemia. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 50:304–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chamberlain M, Soffietti R, Raizer J, Rudà R, Brandsma D, Boogerd W, Taillibert S, Groves MD, Le Rhun E, Junck L, van den Bent M, Wen PY, Jaeckle KA (2014) Leptomeningeal metastasis: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology critical review of endpoints and response criteria of published randomized clinical trials. Neuro-oncology. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou089

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by Grants from NIH (NIH 3P30CA023100-25S8) to S. Kesari.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Scott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scott, B.J., van Vugt, V.A., Rush, T. et al. Concurrent intrathecal methotrexate and liposomal cytarabine for leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors: a retrospective cohort study. J Neurooncol 119, 361–368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1486-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1486-2

Keywords

Navigation