Skip to main content
Log in

Japanese loanword devoicing revisited: a rating study

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Japanese loanword phonology, geminates optionally devoice when there is another voiced obstruent within the same stem, i.e., geminates may optionally devoice when they violate OCP(voice). This devoicing of OCP-violating geminates has received much attention in the recent phonological literature. However, the debates centering around this phenomenon have relied primarily on intuition-based data, and no systematic judgment experiments have been performed. This paper fills that gap. The experiment reported in this paper shows that Japanese speakers do find devoicing of geminates natural when there is another voiced stop within the same word, i.e., when the geminates violate OCP(voice). The experiment moreover finds other interesting aspects of devoicing: (i) the naturalness of devoicing of OCP-violating geminates correlates positively with the lexical frequencies of the words in question, (ii) the naturalness of devoicing of OCP-violating geminates is not significantly affected by place of articulation, (iii) speakers find (context-free) devoicing of geminates more natural than devoicing of OCP-violating singletons, and (iv) speakers find the devoicing of OCP-violating singletons more natural in word-medial position than in word-initial position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alderete, John, and Alexei Kochetov. 2009. Japanese mimetic palatalization revisited: Implications for conflicting directionality. Phonology 26 (3): 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amano, Shigeaki, and Tadahisa Kondo. 2000. NTT database series: Lexical properties of Japanese, 2nd release. Tokyo: Sanseido.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald R. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald R. 2009. LanguageR. R package.

  • Baayen, Harald R., Doug J. Davidson, and Douglas M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelder, Eleanor Olds. 1999. Rule or rote? Native-speaker knowledge of Japanese verb inflection. In Proceedings of the second international conference on cognitive science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Douglas M. 2005. Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News 5: 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, and Ben Bolker. 2011. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package.

  • Beckman, Jill. 1997. Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization, and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14 (1): 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14: 150–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, Juliette. 2005. Understanding antigemination: Natural or unnatural history. In Linguistic diversity and language theories, eds. Zygmunt Frajzyngier, David Rood, and Adam Hodges, 203–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Joan. 1999. Usage-based phonology. In Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, eds. Michael Darnell, Edith Moravscik, Michael Noonan, Frederick Newmeyer, and Kathleen Wheatly, 211–242. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, Andries W. 2008. Grammaticality and ungrammaticality in phonology. Language 84 (2): 218–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, Andries W. 2009. Grammar is both categorical and gradient. In Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation, ed. Steve Parker, 9–42. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, Andries W., and Shigeto Kawahara. 2011. Frequency biases in phonological variation. Manuscript. Michigan University and Rutgers University (submitted for publication in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory).

  • Coetzee, Andries W., and Joe Pater. 2011. The place of variation in phonological theory. In The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., eds. John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan Yu. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Abigail. 2006. Is there gradient phonology? In Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives, eds. Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Fery, Matthias Schlesewsky, and Ralf Vogel, 25–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, John, and Janet Pierrehumbert. 1997. Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability. In Computational phonology: Third meeting of the ACL special interest group in computational phonology, 49–56. Somerset: Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. Clifford. 2009. Adaptation and transmission in Japanese loanword phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Dabrowska, Ewa. 2010. Naive vs. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review 27 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Stuart, and Natsuko Tsujimura. 1991. An autosegmental account of Japanese verbal conjugation. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 13: 117–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernestus, Mirjam, and Harald R. Baayen. 2003. Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79: 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, Gisbert, Caroline Féry, Ralf Vogel, and Matthias Schlesewsky, eds. 2006. Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris-Trimble, Ashley. 2008. Cumulative faithfulness effects in phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Flemming, Edward. 1995. Auditory representations in phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Frisch, Stefan, Nathan Large, and David Pisoni. 2000. Perception of wordlikiness: Effects of segment probability and length of the processing of nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language 42: 481–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, Stephan, Janet Pierrehumbert, and Michael Broe. 2004. Similarity avoidance and the OCP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22: 179–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Edward, and Evelina Fedorenko. 2010. Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (6): 233–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Joseph, and James Jenkins. 1964. Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word 20: 157–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griner, Barry. 2001. Productivity of Japanese verb tense inflection: A case study. MA thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Hamano, Shoko. 1986. The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

  • Hamano, Shoko. 2000. Voicing of obstruents in Old Japanese: Evidence from the sound-symbolic stratum. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9: 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraguchi, Shosuke. 2006. A theory of voicing. Manuscript. Meikai University (available at http://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/ulcl/faculty/vdweijer/jvoice/haraguchi.pdf).

  • Hawkins, John, and Anne Cutler. 1988. Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmetry. In Explaining language universals., ed. J. A. Hawkins, 280–317. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Jennifer, Janet Pierrehumbert, and Mary Beckman. 2003. Speech perception, well-formedness, and the statistics of the lexicon. In Papers in laboratory phonology VI: Phonetic interpretation, eds. John Local, Richard Ogden, and Rosalind Temple, 58–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Bruce. 2000. Gradient well-formedness in Optimality Theory. In Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition, eds. Joost Dekkers, Frank Van der Leeuw, and Jeroen Van de Weijer, 88–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Bruce. 2009. Embedding grammar in a quantitative framework: Case studies from phonology and metrics. A  handout for a minicourse at Brown University.

  • Hayes, Bruce, and Zsuzsa Londe. 2006. Stochastic phonological knowledge: The case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23: 59–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Leonard, Margeret White, and Douglas Atwood. 1968. Word fragments as aids to recall: The organization of a word. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (2): 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Leonard, Peter Chilian, and Kenneth Dunnigan. 1969. Word fragments and their reintegrative powers. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2): 392–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichimura, Larry. 2006. Anti-homophony blocking and its productivity in transparadigmatic relations. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University.

  • Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 1986. The phonology of voicing in Japanese: Theoretical consequences for morphological accessibility. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 1995. Japanese phonology. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. John Goldsmith, 817–838. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 1999. The phonological lexicon. In The handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. Natsuko Tsujimura, 62–100. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 2004. Morphological contrast and merger: Ranuki in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 20: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 2008. Lexical classes in phonology. In The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, eds. S. Miyagawa and M. Saito, 84–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, Jeri J. 1983. Assessing the psychological status of the vowel shift rule. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13: 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, Emiko, and Gregory Iverson. 2009. Phonetic and other factors in Japanese on-line adaptation of English final consonants. In Studies in language sciences 8: Papers from the eighth annual conference of the Japanese Society for Language Science, eds. Shunji Inagaki and Makiko Hirakawa. Tokyo: Kuroshio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katayama, Motoko. 1998. Optimality Theory and Japanese loanword phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

  • Kawahara, Shigeto. 2006. A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: The case of voicing in Japanese. Language 82 (3): 536–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara, Shigeto. 2008. Phonetic naturalness and unnaturalness in Japanese loanword phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18 (4): 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara, Shigeto. 2011a. Aspects of Japanese loanword devoicing. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20.

  • Kawahara, Shigeto. 2011b. Experimental approaches in theoretical phonology. In The Blackwell companion to phonology, eds. Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice, 2283–2303. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara, Shigeto. 2011c. Modes of phonological judgments. Manuscript. Rutgers University. (Talk presented at the University of Pennsylvania, Oct 2010).

  • Kawahara, Shigeto, and Kazuko Shinohara. 2011. Phonetic and psycholinguistic prominences in pun formation: Experimental evidence for positional faithfulness. In Japanese/Korean linguistics 18, eds. W. McClure and M. den Dikken, 177–188. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, Julie. 1973. Loanwords and the phonological structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • Lyman, Benjamin S. 1894. Change from surd to sonant in Japanese compounds. Oriental Studies of the Oriental Club of Philadelphia.

  • McCarthy, John J. 2008. Doing optimality theory. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mester, Armin, and Junko Itô. 1989. Feature predictability and underspecification: Palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Language 65: 258–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, James. 2009. Syntactic judgment experiments. Language and Linguistic Compass 3 (1): 406–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, Kohei. 2003. Lyman’s Law in loanwords. MA thesis, Nagoya University.

  • Nolan, Francis. 1992. The descriptive role of segments: Evidence from assimilation. In Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody, eds. G. R. Docherty and D. R. Ladd, 261–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, Sieb. 1981. Lexical retrieval from fragments of spoken words: Beginnings vs. endings. Journal of Phonetics 9: 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, John J. 1974. Experimental historical phonology. In Historical linguistics II: Theory and description in phonology. Proceedings of the first international linguistic conference on historical linguistics, eds. J. M. Naderson and Charles Jones, 353–389. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, Jaye. 2002. Contrast and postvelar fronting in Russian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21: 39–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pater, Joe. 2009. Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33: 999–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pertz, D. L., and T. G. Bever. 1975. Sensitivity to phonological universals in children and adolescents. Language 51: 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Stochastic phonology. GLOT 5: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pycha, Anne, Eurie Shin, and Rhan Shosted. 2006. Directionality of assimilation in consonant clusters: An experimental approach. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report.

  • R Development Core Team. 1993–2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Software, available at http://www.R-project.org.

  • Reips, Ulf-Dietrich. 2002. Standards for internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology 49 (4): 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Keren. 2006. On the patterning of voiced stops in loanwords in Japanese. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 26: 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Nathan. 2003. Opacity and sound change in the Polish lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

  • Schütze, Carlson. 1996. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara, Shigeko. 2004. Emergence of universal grammar in foreign word adaptations. In Constraints in phonological acquisition, eds. René Kager, Joe Pater, and Wim Zonneveld, 292–320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirai, Setsuko. 2002. Gemination in loans from English to Japanese. MA thesis, University of Washington.

  • Sprouse, Jon. 2007. Continuous acceptability, categorical grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics 1: 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade, Donca. 2004. Projecting non-lexical phonology from phonetic knowledge. Talk presented at “Symposium on phonological theory: representations and architectures” (the City University of New York, Feb 20–21st, 2004).

  • Steriade, Donca. 2008. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In The nature of the word, eds. Kristin Hanson and Sharon Inkelas, 151–179. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Keiichiro. 1998. A typological investigation of dissimilation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.

  • Tanaka, Shin-Ichi. 2010. The eurhythmics of segmental melody. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 13 (3): 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tateishi, Koichi. 2002. Bunpoo no ichibutoshite no goisoo no zehi [Lexical strata as a part of grammar]. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 6 (1): 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesar, Bruce. 2007. A comparison of lexicographic and linear numeric optimization using violation difference ratios. Manuscript. Rutgers University.

  • Tsuchida, Ayako. 1997. Phonetics and phonology of Japanese vowel devoicing. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Urbanczyk, Suzanne. 2005. Enhancing contrast in reduplication. In Studies on reduplication, ed. B. Hurch, 431–454. Mouton: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, Timothy J. 1980. The psychological status of a constraint on Japanese consonant alternation. Linguistics 18: 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, Timothy J. 1987. An introduction to Japanese phonology. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, John R., and Patricia Keating. 1986. On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics 22: 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuraw, Kie. 2000. Patterned exceptions in phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Zuraw, Kie. 2009. Frequency influences on rule application within and across words. In Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society 43-2, 283–309. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeto Kawahara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawahara, S. Japanese loanword devoicing revisited: a rating study. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 29, 705–723 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9131-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9131-7

Keywords

Navigation