Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is There Life After the Death of the Computational Theory of Mind?

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the implications of Fodor’s attacks on the Computational Theory of Mind (CTM), which get their most recent airing in The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way. I argue that if Fodor is right that the CTM founders on the global nature of abductive inference, then several of the philosophical views about the mind that he has championed over the years founder as well. I focus on Fodor’s accounts of mental causation, psychological explanation, and intentionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • T. Burge (1979) Individualism and the Mental P. French T. Euling H. Wettstein (Eds) Midwest Studies in Philosophy lV University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, Minn. 73–121

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Burge (1986) ArticleTitleIntellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind Journal of Philosophy 83 697–720

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Burge (1989) Wherein is Language Social? A. George (Eds) Reflections on Chomsky Blackwell Oxford 175–191

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1974) ArticleTitleSpecial Sciences Synthese 28 77–115 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00485230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1975) The Language of Thought Crowell New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1983) The Modularity of Mind MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1987) Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind MIT Press Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1989) ArticleTitleMaking Mind Matter More Philosophical Topics 17 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1990) A Theory of Content and Other Essays MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1991) ArticleTitleYou Can Fool Some of the People All of the Time, Everything Else Being Equal; Hedged Laws and Psychological Explanations Mind 100 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1994) The Elm and the Expert MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1997) Special Sciences: Still Autonomous after All These Years (A Reply to Jaegwon Kim’s ‘Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction’) J. Tomberlin (Eds) Philosophical Perspectives 11: Mind, Causation, and World Blackwell Oxford 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1998a) Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1998b) In Critical Condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (2000) The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor E. Lepore (1992) Holism: A Shopper’s Guide Oxford Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim (1992) ArticleTitleMultiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Rey (1997) Contemporary Philosophy of Mind: A Contentiously Classical Approach Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Hershfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hershfield, J. Is There Life After the Death of the Computational Theory of Mind?. Mind Mach 15, 183–194 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-005-2003-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-005-2003-3

Keywords

Navigation