Skip to main content
Log in

Professionalism, Organizationalism and Sur-moralism: Three ethical systems for physicians

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last 50 years, the term professionalism has undergone a widespread expansion in its use and a semantic shift in its meaning. As a result, it is at risk of losing its descriptive and analytical value and becoming instead simply an empty evaluative label, a fate described by C. S. Lewis as ‘verbicide’ (Lewis 1967). This article attempts to rescue professionalism from this fate by down-sizing its extension and reassigning some of its work to two other ethical domains, introduced as the neologisms organizationalism and sur-moralism. Professionalism is defined as a morality based in system of obligations that are assumed by physicians over the course of their professional training and which primarily refer to two groups: patients and colleagues, including trainees. Organizationalism is also a morality, but the obligations are owed to the employing organization and on different grounds. A third ethical domain, here called sur-moralism, comprises actions that are not based in obligations. They are discretionary and potentially meritorious; they cannot be required by the profession or organization. This article presents a conceptual model of the three ethical domains and the shifting borders between them. One practical benefit of this typology is that physicians can more accurately understand the nature and sources of obligations that they are asked to accept, and when necessary prioritize them. Another is that physicians will be able to describe the potential tension between the three domains and understand how and why the borders between them can move. Both should help physicians to be more ethically oriented to their work settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AMA Code of Ethics and Principles of Medical Ethics are in Appendices to Baker, R.B., Caplan, A.L., Emanuel, L.L. and Latham, S.R. Eds. 1999. The American Medical Ethics Revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • American Board of Internal Medicine, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine Foundation.

  • Argyris, C. 1954. The fusion of an individual with the organization. American Sociological Review 19 (3): 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. 1957. The individual and organization: Some problems of mutual adjustment. Administrative Science Quarterly 2 (1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke, E.W. 1950. Bonds of organization: An appraisal of corporate human relations. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke, E.W. 1966. Bonds of organization. Hamden: Archon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. 1968. The hierarchy of authority in organizations. American Journal of Sociology 73: 452–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M., and M.W. Meyer. 1971. Bureaucracy in modern society. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M.C., H.-H. Hsiung, J. Harvey, and J.A. LePine. 2015. ‘Well, I’m tired of tryin’!’ Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology 100 (1): 56–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, J.W. 2000. Trust and the healing encounter: An examination of an unorthodox healing performance. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4): 305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A.P., and S.J. Motowidlo. 1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review 11 (4): 710–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.S., and R.E. Quinn. 1999. Four organizational culture types. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.S., and R.E. Quinn. 2006. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chackerian, R., and G. Abcarian. 1984. Bureaucratic power in society. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosson, F.J. 2015. Physician professionalism in employed practice. JAMA 313 (18): 1817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruess, R.L., and S.R. Cruess. 2000. Professionalism: a contract between medicine and society. Canadian Medical Association Journal 162 (5): 668–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie, R.S. 2002. Supererogation and altruism: a comment. Journal of Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.2.75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. 1954. The practice of management. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein, L. 1943. The hippocratic oath: Text, translation, and interpretation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Federation of Internal Medicine. 2002. Medical professionalism in the new millenium: A physician charter. Annals of Internal Medicine 136 (3): 243–246.

  • Feinberg, J. 1961. Supererogation and rules. Ethics 71: 276–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. 1960. Client control and medical practice. American Journal of Sociology 65: 374–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. 1986. Professional powers. A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D. 1977. The social contract as ideology. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (2): 130–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist 58 (3): 473–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday and Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A.R. 1983. The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Krause, E.A. 1996. Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, A.L. 1996. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology 49: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kultgen, J. 1982. The ideological use of professional codes. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 1 (3): 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leake, C.D., ed. 1975. Percival’s medical ethics. Huntington: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.S. 1967. Studies in Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoldrick, P.M. 1984. Saints and heroes: A plea for the supererogatory. Philosophy 59 (230): 523–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D.W., P.M. Podsakoff, and S.P. MacKenzie. 2006. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, N.P., B.D. Blume, S.W. Whiting, and P.M. Podsakoff. 2009. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (1): 122–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomata, G. 1998. Contracting a cure. Patients, healers, and the law in early modern Bologna. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pybus, E.M. 1982. Saints and Heroes. Philosophy 57 (220): 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1949. Authority and the individual. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.H. 2004. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1997. Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swick, H.M. 1998. Academic medicine must deal with the clash of business and professional values. Academic Medicine 73 (7): 751–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmson, J.O. 1958. Saints and heroes. In Essays in moral philosophy, ed. A. Melden, 198–216. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., L.L. Cummings, and J.M. Parks. 1995. Extra role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Research in organizational behavior. L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw. Greenwich Ct, JAI. 17: 215–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H.J. 1956. The organization man. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. 1972. Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L.J., and S.E. Anderson. 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as preditors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management 17: 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association Declaration of Geneva. 2006. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.

  • Wynia, M.K., M. Papadakis, W.M. Sullivan, and F. Hafferty. 2014. More than a list of values and desired behaviors: A foundational understanding of medical professionalism. Academic Medicine 89 (5): 712–714.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Bolton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I have no financial or non-financial interests or conflicts of interest that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolton, J. Professionalism, Organizationalism and Sur-moralism: Three ethical systems for physicians. Med Health Care and Philos 25, 153–159 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10061-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10061-0

Keywords

Navigation