Abstract
Over the last 50 years, the term professionalism has undergone a widespread expansion in its use and a semantic shift in its meaning. As a result, it is at risk of losing its descriptive and analytical value and becoming instead simply an empty evaluative label, a fate described by C. S. Lewis as ‘verbicide’ (Lewis 1967). This article attempts to rescue professionalism from this fate by down-sizing its extension and reassigning some of its work to two other ethical domains, introduced as the neologisms organizationalism and sur-moralism. Professionalism is defined as a morality based in system of obligations that are assumed by physicians over the course of their professional training and which primarily refer to two groups: patients and colleagues, including trainees. Organizationalism is also a morality, but the obligations are owed to the employing organization and on different grounds. A third ethical domain, here called sur-moralism, comprises actions that are not based in obligations. They are discretionary and potentially meritorious; they cannot be required by the profession or organization. This article presents a conceptual model of the three ethical domains and the shifting borders between them. One practical benefit of this typology is that physicians can more accurately understand the nature and sources of obligations that they are asked to accept, and when necessary prioritize them. Another is that physicians will be able to describe the potential tension between the three domains and understand how and why the borders between them can move. Both should help physicians to be more ethically oriented to their work settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AMA Code of Ethics and Principles of Medical Ethics are in Appendices to Baker, R.B., Caplan, A.L., Emanuel, L.L. and Latham, S.R. Eds. 1999. The American Medical Ethics Revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
American Board of Internal Medicine, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine Foundation.
Argyris, C. 1954. The fusion of an individual with the organization. American Sociological Review 19 (3): 267–272.
Argyris, C. 1957. The individual and organization: Some problems of mutual adjustment. Administrative Science Quarterly 2 (1): 1–24.
Bakke, E.W. 1950. Bonds of organization: An appraisal of corporate human relations. New York: Harper.
Bakke, E.W. 1966. Bonds of organization. Hamden: Archon Books.
Blau, P.M. 1968. The hierarchy of authority in organizations. American Journal of Sociology 73: 452–467.
Blau, P.M., and M.W. Meyer. 1971. Bureaucracy in modern society. New York: Random House.
Bolino, M.C., H.-H. Hsiung, J. Harvey, and J.A. LePine. 2015. ‘Well, I’m tired of tryin’!’ Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology 100 (1): 56–74.
Bolton, J.W. 2000. Trust and the healing encounter: An examination of an unorthodox healing performance. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4): 305–319.
Brief, A.P., and S.J. Motowidlo. 1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review 11 (4): 710–725.
Cameron, K.S., and R.E. Quinn. 1999. Four organizational culture types. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Cameron, K.S., and R.E. Quinn. 2006. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Chackerian, R., and G. Abcarian. 1984. Bureaucratic power in society. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Crosson, F.J. 2015. Physician professionalism in employed practice. JAMA 313 (18): 1817.
Cruess, R.L., and S.R. Cruess. 2000. Professionalism: a contract between medicine and society. Canadian Medical Association Journal 162 (5): 668–669.
Downie, R.S. 2002. Supererogation and altruism: a comment. Journal of Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.2.75.
Drucker, P. 1954. The practice of management. New York: Harper Collins.
Edelstein, L. 1943. The hippocratic oath: Text, translation, and interpretation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
European Federation of Internal Medicine. 2002. Medical professionalism in the new millenium: A physician charter. Annals of Internal Medicine 136 (3): 243–246.
Feinberg, J. 1961. Supererogation and rules. Ethics 71: 276–288.
Freidson, E. 1960. Client control and medical practice. American Journal of Sociology 65: 374–382.
Freidson, E. 1986. Professional powers. A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gauthier, D. 1977. The social contract as ideology. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (2): 130–164.
Goffman, E. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist 58 (3): 473–502.
Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday and Co., Inc.
Hochschild, A.R. 1983. The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Krause, E.A. 1996. Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kristof, A.L. 1996. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology 49: 1–49.
Kultgen, J. 1982. The ideological use of professional codes. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 1 (3): 53–69.
Leake, C.D., ed. 1975. Percival’s medical ethics. Huntington: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
Lewis, C.S. 1967. Studies in Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGoldrick, P.M. 1984. Saints and heroes: A plea for the supererogatory. Philosophy 59 (230): 523–528.
Organ, D.W., P.M. Podsakoff, and S.P. MacKenzie. 2006. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. London: Sage Publications.
Podsakoff, N.P., B.D. Blume, S.W. Whiting, and P.M. Podsakoff. 2009. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (1): 122–141.
Pomata, G. 1998. Contracting a cure. Patients, healers, and the law in early modern Bologna. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pybus, E.M. 1982. Saints and Heroes. Philosophy 57 (220): 193–199.
Russell, B. 1949. Authority and the individual. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Schein, E.H. 2004. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.
Simon, H.A. 1997. Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
Swick, H.M. 1998. Academic medicine must deal with the clash of business and professional values. Academic Medicine 73 (7): 751–755.
Urmson, J.O. 1958. Saints and heroes. In Essays in moral philosophy, ed. A. Melden, 198–216. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Van Dyne, L., L.L. Cummings, and J.M. Parks. 1995. Extra role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Research in organizational behavior. L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw. Greenwich Ct, JAI. 17: 215–285.
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Whyte, W.H.J. 1956. The organization man. Garden City: Doubleday.
Williams, B. 1972. Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Williams, L.J., and S.E. Anderson. 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as preditors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management 17: 601–617.
World Medical Association Declaration of Geneva. 2006. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.
Wynia, M.K., M. Papadakis, W.M. Sullivan, and F. Hafferty. 2014. More than a list of values and desired behaviors: A foundational understanding of medical professionalism. Academic Medicine 89 (5): 712–714.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
I have no financial or non-financial interests or conflicts of interest that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bolton, J. Professionalism, Organizationalism and Sur-moralism: Three ethical systems for physicians. Med Health Care and Philos 25, 153–159 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10061-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10061-0