Abstract
The past 10 years have seen considerable developments in the use of narrative in medicine, primarily through the emergence of the so-called narrative medicine. In this article, I question narrative medicine’s self-understanding and contend that one of the most prominent issues is its lack of a clear epistemological framework. Drawing from Gadamer’s work on hermeneutics, I first show that narrative medicine is deeply linked with the hermeneutical field of knowledge. Then I try to identify which claims can be legitimately expected from narrative medicine, and which ones cannot be. I scrutinize in particular whether narrative medicine can legitimately grasp the patient’s lived experience of his or her illness. In the last section of this article, I begin to explore the potential usefulness of this epistemological clarification. This analysis allows for a further understanding of what is really at stake with narrative medicine, and thus to identify when it may be convenient, and when it may not. Furthermore, this clarification opens up promising new possibilities of dialogue with critics of the field. I conclude that narrative medicine finds its proper place as a possible tool available to mediate dialogue, which is at the heart of the clinical encounter in medical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Initially defined as an erroneous heuristic through which someone, attempting to use narratives in order to make sense of insufficient information, mistakenly chooses the wrong narrative and so ends up distorting the evidence presented [22].
References
Charon, Rita. 2006. Narrative medicine: Honoring the stories of illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Charon, Rita. 2001. Narrative medicine: A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA 286: 1897–1902.
Charon, Rita. 2013. Narrative medicine in the international education of physicians. La Presse Medicale 42: 3–5.
DasGupta, Sayantani, and Rita Charon. 2004. Personal illness narratives: Using reflective writing to teach empathy. Academic Medicine 79: 351–356.
Charon, Rita. 2004. Narrative and medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 350: 862–864.
Brody, Howard. 1985. Philosophy of medicine and other humanities: Toward a wholistic view. Theoretical Medicine 6: 243–255.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Daniel, Stephen L. 1986. The patient as text: A model of clinical hermeneutics. Theoretical Medicine 7: 195–210.
Cooper, M.Wayne. 1994. Is medicine hermeneutics all the way down? Theoretical Medicine 15: 149–180.
Leder, Drew. 1990. Clinical interpretation: The hermeneutics of medicine. Theoretical Medicine 11: 9–24.
Gadamer, Hans Georg. 2004. Truth and method. trans. Joel C. Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum.
Baron, Richard J. 1990. Medical hermeneutics: Where is the “text” we are interpreting? Theoretical Medicine 11: 25–28.
Svenaeus, Fredrik. 2000. Hermeneutics of clinical practice: The question of textuality. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21: 171–189.
Gatens-Robinson, Eugenie. 1986. Clinical judgment and the rationality of the human sciences. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11: 167–178.
Charon, Rita. 2007. What to do with stories: The sciences of narrative medicine. Canadian Family Physician 53: 1265–1267.
Charon, Rita, and Peter Wyer. 2008. The art of medicine: Narrative evidence based medicine. The Lancet 371: 296–297.
Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Macnaughton, Jane. 2009. The dangerous practice of empathy. Lancet 373: 1940–1941.
Strawson, Galen. 2004. Against narrativity. Ratio 17: 428–452.
Woods, Angela. 2011. The limits of narrative: Provocations for the medical humanities. Medical Humanities 37: 73–78.
O’Mahony, Seamus. 2013. Against narrative medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 56: 611–619.
Menashe, Doron, and Mutal E. Shamash. 2005. The narrative fallacy. International Commentary on Evidence 3 (1): 3. doi:10.2202/1554-4567.1034.
Solomon, Miriam. 2008. Epistemological reflections on the art of medicine and narrative medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51: 406–417.
Morris, David B. 2008. Narrative medicines: Challenge and resistance. The Permanente Journal 12: 88–96.
Ricœur, Paul. 1991. From text to action. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1996. The enigma of health: The art of healing in a scientific age. trans. Jason Gaiger and Nicholas Walker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Svenaeus, Fredrik. 2000. The hermeneutics of medicine and the phenomenology of health: Steps towards a philosophy of medical practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Sofia Lizza for her help in editing the initial manuscript and Daniel T. Kim for his helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not rely on any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abettan, C. From method to hermeneutics: which epistemological framework for narrative medicine?. Theor Med Bioeth 38, 179–193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-017-9408-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-017-9408-x