This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bains, Sunny. 2011. Questioning the integrity of the John Templeton Foundation. Evolutionary Psychology 9: 92–115.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information 14: 19–47.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Genesis and structure of the religious field. Comparative Social Research 13: 1–44.
Cantor, Geoffrey. 2010. What shall we do with the ‘Conflict Thesis’. In Science and religion: New historical perspectives, ed. Thomas Dixon, Geoffrey Cantor, and Stephen Pumphrey, 283–298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clavelin, Maurice. 2018. Review of L’impossible dialogue. Revue d’histoire des sciences 71: 120–121.
Colyvan, Mark, Jay L. Garfield, and Graham Priest. 2005. Problems with the argument from fine tuning. Synthese 145: 325–338.
Davis, Nicolas. 2016., Hand of God? Scientific anatomy paper citing a ‘creator’ retracted after furore. The Guardian, 7 March. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/mar/07/hand-of-god-scientific-plos-one-anatomy-paper-citing-a-creator-retracted-after-furore. Accessed 17 December 2018.
Dick, Steven J. 1982. Plurality of worlds: The origins of the extraterrestrial life debate from Democritus to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Durkhein, Emile.1984. The division of labor in society. Translated by W.D. Halls. New York: The Free Press.
Harrison, Peter. 2015. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Harrison, Peter. 2017. From Conflict to Dialogue and All the Way Back. Los Angeles Review of Books. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/from-conflict-to-dialogue-and-all-the-way-back
Hobart, Michael E. 2018. The great rift literacy, numeracy, and the religion-science divide. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Horgan, John. 2006. The templeton foundation: A Skeptic’s take. Edge. 4 April 2006. https://www.edge.org/conversation/john_horgan-the-templeton-foundation-a-skeptics-take. Accessed 17 December 2018.
Iliffe, Rob. 2017. Priest of nature. The religious worlds of Isaac Newton. Oxford: Oxford Universty Press.
Ming-Jin, Liu, Cai-Hua Xiong, Le Xiong, and Xiao-Lin Huang. 2016. Biomechanical characteristics of hand coordination in grasping activities of daily living. PLOS One, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/comment?id=10.1371/annotation/234ef7cc-d89a-4a9e-92d6-9070b175620d. Accessed 17 December 2018.
Ohlers, R. Clinton. 2018. Review essay of the territories of science and religion. Fides et Historia 50: 85–93.
Sarton, George. 1950. Notes on the reviewing of learned books. Isis 41: 149–158.
Shea, William R. 2018. Review of science and religion, an impossible dialogue. Fides et Historia 50: 136–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gingras, Y. Response to critics: how religious beliefs distort historical understanding. Metascience 28, 237–248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-019-00389-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-019-00389-y