Skip to main content
Log in

Jean-Yves Lacoste’s thesis on truth

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay offers a commentary of Jean-Yves Lacoste’s most recent book Théses sur le vrai (2018). It does so through a close reading of the book’s main arguments and through relating this most recent work to Lacoste’s earlier thinking. Lacoste here offers a new introduction to his body of work by elaborating on the phenomenological experience of truth. Truth, Lacoste argues, is first and foremost experienced in experiences of newness and in experiences offered through poetry. These experiences show and manifest the truth as “unexpected.” Such a surprise, for Lacoste, can be read as a secular translation of what theology calls the “good news.” The book concludes with new insights in Lacoste’s thinking of the relation between philosophy and theology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A translation of this book has recently appeared: see Lacoste (2018b). For a survey of translations and secondary literature on Lacoste’s work, see Schrijvers (2015).

  2. Lacoste (2018a, p. 185 and p. 174 respectively).

  3. Cf. Ibid., p. 123.

  4. E.g. Ibid., p. 185.

  5. Ibid., p. 178.

  6. Ibid., p. 179.

  7. Ibid., p. 178.

  8. Lacoste (2015b, p. 97-124).

  9. Ibid., p. 103.

  10. Reference here is to Lacoste’s definition of Heidegger’s Schuldigsein, “we owe it to ourselves to become ourselves” in Lacoste (2011, p. 201). For an analysis of this book, see Schrijvers (2012, p. 157-190).

  11. Lacoste (2015b, p.114).

  12. Lacoste (2018a, p. 10).

  13. Lacoste (2015a, p. 263).

  14. Cf. Lacoste (2018a, p. 11).

  15. Lacoste (2015a, p. 61).

  16. Ibid., p. 115-118.

  17. Lacoste (2018a, p. 21).

  18. Ibid., p. 26.

  19. Lacoste (2006, p. 120).

  20. Lacoste (2018a, p. 25).

  21. Cf. Lacoste (2006, p. 117).

  22. Cf. Lacoste (2015a, p. 46).

  23. Lacoste (2018a, p. 27).

  24. Lacoste (2018a, p. 32).

  25. Lacoste (2008, pp. 133–157; 2006, pp. 159–177).

  26. Lacoste (2018a, p. 33).

  27. Cf. Lacoste (2015a, p. 208).

  28. Ibid., p. 49.

  29. Ibid., p. 262.

  30. Lacoste (2011, p. 92).

  31. Lacoste (2015a, p. 197).

  32. Ibid., p. 43 and p. 157.

  33. Lacoste (2011, p. 51-55).

  34. Lacoste (2018a, p. 44).

  35. Ibid., p. 46.

  36. Ibid., p. 47.

  37. Ibid., p. 47 and 49.

  38. Ibid., p. 48.

  39. Ibid., p. 50.

  40. Lacoste (2006, p. 301).

  41. Lacoste (2018a, p. 54).

  42. Ibid., p. 55.

  43. Ibid., p. 61.

  44. Ibid., p. 61.

  45. Ibid., p. 83.

  46. Ibid., p. 62.

  47. Ibid., p. 71.

  48. Ibid, p. 68.

  49. Lacoste (2015c, p. 2).

  50. Lacoste (2018a, p. 74).

  51. Ibid., p. 75.

  52. Lacoste (2015c, p. 2).

  53. Lacoste (2018a, p. 73).

  54. E.g. Lacoste (2006, p. 248ff).

  55. Lacoste (2015c, p. 2; Cf. 2018a, p. 141).

  56. Lacoste (2018a, p. 56 and p. 88).

  57. Ibid., p. 93.

  58. Cf. Ibid., p. 86.

  59. Ibid., p. 88.

  60. Ibid., p. 88.

  61. Ibid., p. 89.

  62. Ibid., p. 89.

  63. Ibid., p. 65.

  64. Ibid., p. 93.

  65. Ibid., p. 54.

  66. Ibid., p. 95.

  67. Ibid., p. 102.

  68. Ibid., p. 104.

  69. Ibid., p. 104.

  70. Ibid., p. 104 and p. 105 respectively.

  71. Ibid., p. 104 and see Lacoste (2000, pp. 57–106).

  72. Ibid., p. 106.

  73. Ibid., p. 106.

  74. Lacoste (2009, p. 145).

  75. Lacoste (2018a, p. 106).

  76. Ibid., p. 109, also p. 135ff.

  77. Ibid., p. 111.

  78. Ibid., p. 111.

  79. Cf. Ibid., p. 109 (leaving Heidegger) and p. 112 for the quote.

  80. Lacoste (2015a, p. 150).

  81. Lacoste (2018a, p. 124).

  82. Cf. Ibid., p. 121.

  83. Ibid., p. 119.

  84. Ibid., p. 115.

  85. Cf. Ibid., p. 64 and p. 68.

  86. Cf. Ibid., p. 127.

  87. Lacoste (2015a, p. 223).

  88. Lacoste (2018a, p. 117 and p. 120).

  89. Ibid., p. 120.

  90. Ibid., p. 121.

  91. Ibid., p. 123.

  92. Ibid., p. 123.

  93. Ibid., p. 117.

  94. Ibid., p. 125.

  95. Ibid., p. 126.

  96. Ibid., p. 124.

  97. Ibid., p. 125.

  98. Ibid., p. 125-126.

  99. Ibid., p. 126.

  100. Ibid., p. 131.

  101. Ibid., p. 128.

  102. Ibid., p. 130.

  103. Ibid., p. 131.

  104. Ibid., p. 132.

  105. Ibid., p. 133.

  106. Ibid., p. 76.

  107. Ibid., p. 134.

  108. Ibid., p. 136.

  109. Ibid., p. 140.

  110. Ibid., p. 143 and p.145 respectively.

  111. Ibid., p. 139 and p. 145.

  112. Ibid., p. 145.

  113. Ibid., p. 145.

  114. Ibid., p. 146.

  115. Ibid., p. 150.

  116. Ibid., p. 151.

  117. Ibid., p. 155.

  118. Ibid., p. 155.

  119. Ibid., p. 155.

  120. Ibid., p. 155.

  121. Ibid., p. 156.

  122. Lacoste (2006, p. 332).

  123. Lacoste (2018a, p. 157).

  124. Ibid., p. 157.

  125. Ibid., p. 157.

  126. Ibid., p. 158.

  127. Ibid., p. 160.

  128. Ibid., p. 161.

  129. Ibid., p. 161.

  130. Ibid., p. 161.

  131. Ibid., p. 162 and p. 163.

  132. Lacoste (2015a, p. 156).

  133. Lacoste (2015c, p. 3).

  134. Ibid., p. 3.

  135. Lacoste (2018a, p. 163).

  136. Lacoste (2015a, p. 161).

  137. Ibid., p. 258.

  138. Ibid., p. 250 and p. 256.

  139. Lacoste (2018a, p. 169).

  140. Ibid., p. 170.

  141. Ibid., p. 170.

  142. Ibid., p. 170.

  143. Ibid., p. 171.

  144. Ibid., p. 173.

  145. Ibid., p. 175.

  146. Ibid., p. 175.

  147. Lacoste (2015a, p. 279).

  148. Ibid., p. 284.

  149. Lacoste (2006, p. 78).

  150. Lacoste (2015a, p. 285).

  151. Ibid., p. 283.

  152. Lacoste (2009, p. 150).

  153. Lacoste (2018a, p. 177).

  154. Ibid., p. 177.

  155. Ibid., p. 177.

  156. Ibid., p. 177.

  157. Ibid., p. 180.

  158. Ibid., p. 181.

  159. Ibid., p. 183.

  160. Ibid., p. 184.

  161. Ibid., p. 184.

  162. Ibid., p. 185.

  163. Ibid., p. 185.

  164. Ibid., p. 186.

  165. Ibid., p. 188.

  166. Ibid., p. 191-192.

  167. Ibid., p. 194.

  168. Ibid., p. 194.

  169. Ibid., p. 195.

  170. Lacoste (2014, 87).

References

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2000. Le Monde et l’absence d’œuvre. Paris: PUF.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2006. Présence et parousie. Genève: Ad Solem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2008. La phénoménalité de Dieu. Paris: Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2011. Être en danger. Paris: Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2014. From Theology to Theological Thinking. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2015a. Recherches sur la parole. Louvain: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2015b. L’intuition sacramentelle et autres essais. Genève: Ad Solem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2015c. Thèses sur le vrai. In Revue Résurrection 159/160, 1-5.

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2018a. Thèses sur le vrai. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, Jean-Yves. 2018b. The Appearing of God. Trans. O. O’Donovan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Schrijvers, Joeri. 2012. An Introduction to Jean-Yves Lacoste. London: Asghate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrijvers, Joeri (ed.). 2015. Symposium on the Thought of Jean-Yves Lacoste. In Modern Theology 31/4, 637-683.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joeri Schrijvers.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schrijvers, J. Jean-Yves Lacoste’s thesis on truth. Cont Philos Rev 53, 487–510 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-020-09498-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-020-09498-6

Keywords

Navigation