Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aesthetics of Law and Literary License: An Anatomy of the Legal Imagination

Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a normative discipline, law defines its territory according to simple categories which establish absolute principles purporting to offer a single truth as to what is just and unjust, right and wrong, good and bad. In addition, linguistic and extrasemantic devices such as synecdoche, metonymy, rhythm and metaphor serve a referential function with which to penetrate the collective consciousness. The core assumptions derived from the implementation of socio-linguistic mechanisms transform the nature of legal analysis and are embedded within a diverse interplay of meanings. Aesthetic imaginings are evidenced to underpin and sustain ‘law’s symbolic processes and doctrines, institutions and ideas; that is, a realm of limitless fantasy, of free-flowing nomological desire, fixed around, and fixated upon controlling images that condense its central juridical concepts’; as the ‘jurists follow their own poetic and aesthetic criteria, their own spectral laws’ (MacNeil in Novel judgments: legal theory as fiction. Routledge, Oxford, p 9, 2012; Goodrich in Legal emblems and the art of law: obiter depicta as the vision of governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 155, 2013). Yet still, founded on the negation of its own history, legal practice maintains that juridical arguments comprise only dialectical reasoning about objectively determined concepts: ‘law is a literature which denies its literary qualities. It is a play of words which asserts an absolute seriousness; it is a genre of rhetoric which represses its moments of invention or fiction… it is procedure based upon analogy, metaphor and repetition [that] lays claim to being a cold or disembodied prose’ (Goodrich in Law in the courts of love: literature and other minor jurisprudences. Routledge, Oxford, p 112, 1996). This article will explore the continuing commitment of modern legal practice to particular aesthetic values and how these are crucially implicated in a variety of legal competencies including the formation of key legal concepts and general intellectual activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. 2005. State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aristodemou, M. 2001. Law and literature: journeys from her to eternity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1995. Poetics (trans: Halliwell, S.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

  • Aristotle, 1959. On Rhetoric (trans: Freese, J.H.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Loeb Classical Library/Harvard University Press.

  • Baudrillard, J. 1995. The Gulf War Did Not Take Place (trans: Patton, P.). Bloomington, Indiana: University of Indiana Press.

  • Ben-Dor, O. 2011. Law and art: Justice, ethics and aesthetics. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. 1977. A Comment on the commentaries and a fragment on government. Eds. Burns, J.H. and Hart, H.L.A. London: Athlone Press.

  • Berger, L. 2009. How embedded knowledge structures affect judicial decision making: A rhetorical analysis of metaphor, narrative and imagination in child custody disputes. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 18: 259–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, B. 2003. Aesthetics and American Law. Legal Studies Forum 27 (1): 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. 1998. Notebooks 19351951 (trans: Thody, P.) New York: Marlowe & Co.

  • Cassirer, E. 1946. The myth of the state. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 2000. The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion, and the making of consciousness. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. 1994. The Society of the Spectacle (trans: Nicholson-Smith, D.). New York: Zone Books.

  • Dewey, J. 1980. Art as experience. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. 1988. Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas, C., and L. Nead. 1999. Law and the image: The authority of art and the aesthetics of law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas, C., and R. Warrington. 1994. Justice miscarried: Ethics, aesthetics and the law. London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. 2000. The civilizing process (trans: Jephcott, E.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 19721977 (trans: Gordon, C. et al.). Ed. Gordon, C. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Fuchs, C. 2008. Internet and society: Social theory in the information age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, L. 1930. Legal fictions. Illinois Law Review 25 (4): 363–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, A. 2001. Law and aesthetics. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers, K. 2011. Epilogue. In Law and art: Justice, ethics and aesthetics, ed. O. Ben-Dor. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1983. Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, P. 1993. Gynaetopia: Feminine genealogies of common law. Journal of Law and Society 20: 276–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, P. 1995. Oedipus lex: psychoanalysis, history, law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, P. 1996. Law in the courts of love: Literature and other minor jurisprudences. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, P. 2013 ‘Conclusion: Virtual Laws’. In Legal Emblems and the Art of Law: Obiter Depicta as the Vision of Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gurnham, D. 2009. Memory, imagination, justice: Intersections of law and literature. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. 2001. Imagined Violence/QueerViolence: Representations of Rage and Resistance. In Reel knockouts, ed. M. McCaughey, and N. King, 244–266. Austin, Texas: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, A.P. 1979. Fardell v Potts: The myth of the unreasonable man. Uncommon law, 1–6. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, H. 2000. Rhetoric and dialectic: Some historical and legal perspectives. Argumentation 14 (3): 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonson, B. 1906. Discoveries: A Critical Edition. Ed. M. Castelain. Paris: Librairie Hachette & Co.

  • Kant, I. 1952. Critique of judgment (trans: Creed Meredith, J.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Kant, I. 1993. On a Newly Arisen Superior Tone in Philosophy. In Raising the tone of philosophy, ed. P. Fenves. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantorowicz, E.H. 1957. The king’s two bodies: A study in mediaeval political theology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, W.P. 2012. Novel judgments: Legal theory as fiction. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, D. 2000. Songs without music; Aesthetic dimensions of law and justice. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. 1991. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J.G. 2012. Punishment and the moral emotions: Essays in law, morality, and religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, J.E. 1990. Queen Elizabeth I. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan Jr., J.T. 2002. Persons and masks of the law: Cardozo, Holmes, Jefferson, and Wythe as makers of the masks. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  • Plato, 1997. Republic, In Complete works (trans: Grube, G.M.A.). Ed. Cooper, J. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Co.

  • Popper, K. 2003. The Open Society and its EnemiesVolume One: The Spell of Plato. Oxford: Routledge Classics.

  • Posner, R. 1988. Law and literature: A misunderstood relation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttenham,G. 1936. The Arte of English Poesie, ed. E. Arber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ricoeur, P. 1979. The Metaphorical Process of Cognition, Imagination and Feeling. In On Metaphor, ed. S. Sacks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, A. 2011. Imagining legality: Where law meets popular culture. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlag, P. 2002. The aesthetics of American Law. Harvard Law Review 115: 1047–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J.J.A. 2013. Reimagining the Humanities within Socio-Legal Studies in an Age of Disenchantment. In Exploring the Socio: Socio-Legal Studies, ed. D. Feenan. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 111–133.

  • Shaw, J.J.A. 2015a. Compassion and the criminal justice system: Stumbling along towards a jurisprudence of love and forgiveness. International Journal of Law in Context 11 (1): 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J.J.A. 2015b. From homo economicus to homo roboticus: An exploration of the transformative impact of the technological imaginary. International Journal of Law in Context 11 (3): 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J.J.A., and H.J. Shaw. 2015. The politics and poetics of spaces and places: Mapping the multiple geographies of identity in a cultural posthuman era. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change 12 (3): 234–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J.J.A., and H.J. Shaw. 2016. Mapping the technologies of spatial (in)justice in the Anthropocene. Information & Communications Technology Law 25 (1): 32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Munster, R. 2011. The war on terrorism: When the exception becomes the rule. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 17 (2): 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, I. 2009. Law, text, terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. 1985. Jurisprudence as narrative: An aesthetic analysis of modern legal theory. New York University Law Review 60 (2): 145–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J.B. 1973. The legal imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J.B. 2012. Justice in Tension: An Expression of Law and the Legal Mind. No Foundations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Law and Justice 9: 1–19; available at http://www.helsinki.fi/nofo/NoFo9WHITE.html (Accessed 27 November 2016).

  • Weisberg, R. 1989. The law-literature enterprise. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 1 (4): 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. 2002. Empty justice: One hundred years of law, literature, and philosophy. London: Cavendish Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. 2002. Welcome to the desert of the real. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia J. A. Shaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaw, J.J.A. Aesthetics of Law and Literary License: An Anatomy of the Legal Imagination. Liverpool Law Rev 38, 83–104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-017-9195-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-017-9195-5

Keywords

Navigation