Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation and testing for clustered interval-censored bivariate survival data with application using the semi-parametric version of the Clayton–Oakes model

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Kaplan–Meier estimator is ubiquitously used to estimate survival probabilities for time-to-event data. It is nonparametric, and thus does not require specification of a survival distribution, but it does assume that the risk set at any time t consists of independent observations. This assumption does not hold for data from paired organ systems such as occur in ophthalmology (eyes) or otolaryngology (ears), or for other types of clustered data. In this article, we estimate marginal survival probabilities in the setting of clustered data, and provide confidence limits for these estimates with intra-cluster correlation accounted for by an interval-censored version of the Clayton–Oakes model. We develop a goodness-of-fit test for general bivariate interval-censored data and apply it to the proposed interval-censored version of the Clayton–Oakes model. We also propose a likelihood ratio test for the comparison of survival distributions between two groups in the setting of clustered data under the assumption of a constant between-group hazard ratio. This methodology can be used both for balanced and unbalanced cluster sizes, and also when the cluster size is informative. We compare our test to the ordinary log rank test and the Lin-Wei (LW) test based on the marginal Cox proportional Hazards model with robust standard errors obtained from the sandwich estimator. Simulation results indicate that the ordinary log rank test over-inflates type I error, while the proposed unconditional likelihood ratio test has appropriate type I error and higher power than the LW test. The method is demonstrated in real examples from the Sorbinil Retinopathy Trial, and the Age-Related Macular Degeneration Study. Raw data from these two trials are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group (2001) A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol 119(10):1417–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betensky RA, Finkelstein DM (1999) A non-parametric maximum likelihood estimator for bivariate interval censored data. Stat Med 18(22):3089–3100 (PMID: 10544308)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broyden CG (1970) The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms. J Inst Math Appl 6:76–90

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DG (1978) A model for association in bivariate life-tables and its application in epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 65:141–151

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher R (1987) Practical methods of optimization. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gehan EA (1965) A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily single censored samples. Biometrika 52:203–223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington DP, Fleming TR (1982) A class of rank test procedures for censored survival data. Biometrika 69:133–143

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (1995) Frailty models for survival data. Lifetime Data Anal 1:255–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huster WJ, Brookmeyer R, Self SG (1989) Modelling paired survival data with covariates. Biometrics 45(1):145–156

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jung S (1999) Rank tests for matched survival data. Lifetime Data Anal 5:67–79

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jung S, Jeong J (2003) Rank tests for clustered survival data. Lifetime Data Anal 9:21–33

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klein JP (1992) Semiparametric estimation of random effects using the Cox model based on the EM algorithm. Biometrics 48:795–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EW, Wei LJ, Amato DA (1992) Cox–type regression analysis for large numbers of small groups of correlated failure time observations. In: Klein JP, Goel PK (eds) Survival analysis: state of the art. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 237–247

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EW, Wei LJ, Ying Z (1993) Linear regression analysis for highly stratified failure time data. J Am Stat Assoc 88:557–565

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CF, Cheng AC, Fong DY (2012) Eyes or subjects: are ophthalmic randomized controlled trials properly designed and analyzed? Ophthalmology 119(4):869–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin DY (1994) Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: the marginal approach. Stat Med 13:2233–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin DY, Wei LJ (1989) Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modeling marginal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 84:1074–1078

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemo Rep 50:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes D (1982) A model for association in bivariate survival data. JRSS B 44(3):414–422

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peto R, Peto J (1972) Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Series A 135:185–206

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice RL (1978) Linear rank tests with right censored data. Biometrika 65:167–179

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice R (2016) Higher dimensional Clayton–Oakes models for multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 103(1):231–236

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice R, Zhao S (2018) Nonparametric estimation of the multivariate survivor function: the multivariate Kaplan–Meier estimator. Lifetime Data Anal 24(1):3–27

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner B (1982) Statistical methods in ophthalmology: an adjustment for the intraclass correlation between eyes. Biometrics 38:105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage IR (1956) Contributions to the theory of rank order statistics—the two sample case. Ann Math Stat 27:590–615

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shih JH, Louis TA (1995) Assessing gamma frailty models for clustered failure time data. Lifetime Data Anal 1:205–220

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sorbinil Retinopathy Trial Research Group (1990) A randomized trial of Sorbinil, an aldose reductase inhibitor, in diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 108:1234–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J (2006) The statistical analysis of interval-censored failure time data. Springer

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Wang L, Sun J (2006) Estimation of the association for bivariate interval-censored failure time data. Scand J Stat 33:637–649

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tarone RE, Ware J (1977) On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions. Biometrika 64:156–160

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Ding AA (2000) On assessing the association for bivariate current status data. Biometrika 87:879–893

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wellner JA, Zhan Y (1997) A hybrid algorithm for computation of the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator from censored data. J Am Stat Assoc 92:945–959

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ying Z, Wei LJ (1994) The Kaplan–Meier estimate for dependent failure time observations. J Multivar Anal 50:17–29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng D, Gao F, Lin DY (2017) Maximum likelihood estimation for semiparametric regression models with multivariate interval-censored data. Biometrika 104(3):505–525 (PMID: 29391606; PMCID: PMC5787874)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HG, Ying GS (2018) Statistical approaches in published ophthalmic clinical science papers: a comparison to statistical practice two decades ago. Br J Ophthalmol 102(9):1188–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The funding was provided by Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. EY022445).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Rosner.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 228 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosner, B., Bay, C., Glynn, R.J. et al. Estimation and testing for clustered interval-censored bivariate survival data with application using the semi-parametric version of the Clayton–Oakes model. Lifetime Data Anal 29, 854–887 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-022-09588-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-022-09588-y

Keywords

Navigation