Abstract
This paper argues for the superiority of international law’s existing ban on unilateral secession over its reform to include either a primary or remedial right to secession. I begin by defending the claim that secession is an inherently institutional concept, and that therefore we ought to employ institutional moral reasoning to defend or criticize specific proposals regarding a right to secede. I then respond to the objection that at present we lack the empirical evidence necessary to sustain any specific conclusion regarding an international legal right to secession. Specifically, I argue that we ought to adopt a precautionary approach, and that such an approach justifies giving no weight to promoting political self-determination per se when considering whether to reform international law governing secession. I conclude with several reasons to think that even a remedial right to unilateral secession will detract from, not enhance, the international legal order’s ability to promote peace and human rights.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, Andrew and Christopher Heath Wellman, A Liberal Theory of International Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).
Anderson, Glen, ‘Secession in International Law and Relations: What are We Talking About?’, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 35 (2013): 343–388.
Bederman, David J., International Law Frameworks, 2nd Edition (New York: Foundation Press, 2006).
Bakke, Kristin M. and Erik Wibbels, ‘Diversity, Disparity, and Civil Conflict in Federal States’, World Politics 59 (2006): 1–50.
Bellamy, Alex J. and Paul D. Williams, ‘On the Limits of Moral Hazard: The Responsibility to Protect, Armed Conflict, and Mass Atrocities’, European Journal of International Relations 18:3 (2012): 539–571.
Berman, Paul Schiff, ‘Seeing Beyond the Limits of International Law’, Texas Law Review 84 (2006): 1265–1306.
Brunnee, Jutta and Stephen J. Toope, ‘Constructivism and International Law’, in J. L. Dunoff and M. A. Pollack (eds.) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Buchanan, Allen, ‘Secession’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/secession/.
Buchanan, Allen, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).
Copp, David, ‘International Law and Morality in the Theory of Secession’, Journal of Ethics, 2 (1998): 219–245.
Craven, Matthew, ‘Statehood, Self-Determination, and Recognition’, in Malcolm D. Evans (ed.), International Law, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 203–251.
Crawford, James R., The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 375–415.
Fazal, Tanisha, ‘Is the Islamic State a Secessionist Movement?’, The International Relations and Security Network, February 20, 2015. http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Articles/Detail/?id=188149; last accessed July 17, 2015.
Ford, Richard T., ‘Law’s Territory: A History of Jurisdiction’, University of Michigan Law Review 97:4 (1999): 843–930.
Gardiner, Stephen, ‘A Core Precautionary Principle’, Journal of Political Philosophy 14:1 (2006): 45–49.
Horowitz, Donald, ‘A Right to Secede?’, in Stephen Macedo and Allen Buchanan (eds.), Secession and Self-Determination, NOMOS XLV (New York: New York University Press, 2003).
Howse, Robert and Ruti Teitel, ‘Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters’, Global Policy 1:2 (2010): 127–136.
Kemoklidze, Nino, ‘The Kosovo Precedent and the ‘Moral Hazard’ of Secession’, Journal of International Law and International Relations 5:2 (2009): 117–140.
Knight, Jack and James Johnson, The Priority of Democracy: The Political Consequences of Pragmatism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011).
Kuperman, Alan J., ‘The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans’, International Studies Quarterly 52:1 (2008): 49–80.
Lefkowitz, David, ‘Sources in Legal Positivist Theories: Law as Necessarily Posited and the Challenge of Customary Law Creation’, in Samantha Besson and Jean D’Aspremont (eds.), Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).
Lefkowitz, David, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law’, in David Held and Pietro Maffettone (eds.), Global Political Theory (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016).
Lefkowitz, David, ‘Reflections on the Thin Justice of International Law: Peace, Justice, and Secession’, Ethics and International Affairs Online, http://www.ethicsandinternationalaffairs.org/2015/reflections-on-the-thin-justice-of-international-law-peace-justice-and-secession-2/.
Lefkowitz, David, ‘A New Philosophy for International Legal Skepticism? Dworkin, Republicanism, and the Rule of International Law’, unpublished manuscript on file with author.
Miller, David, ‘Secession and the Principle of Nationality’, in M. Moore (ed.), National Self-Determination and Secession (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Moore, Margaret, The Ethics of Nationalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Neff, Stephen C., Justice Among Nations: A History of International Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014).
Norman, Wayne, ‘The Ethics of Secession as the Regulation of Secessionist Politics’, in Margaret Moore (ed.), National Self- Determination and Secession (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 34–61.
Postema, Gerald, ‘Custom, Normative Practice, and the Law’, Duke Law Journal 62 (2012): 707–738.
Ratner, Steven R. The Thin Justice of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2003).
Sambanis, Nicholas and Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl, ‘What’s in a Line?’, International Security 34:2 (2009): 82–118.
Shue, Henry, ‘Do We Need a Morality of War?’, in David Rodin and Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 87–111.
Sirosky David S., ‘Explaining Secession’, in Aleksandar Pavkovic and Peter Radan (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Secession (Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 2011).
Weinstock, Daniel, ‘Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 9:2 (2001): 182–203.
Wiens, David, ‘Prescribing Institutions Without Ideal Theory’, Journal of Political Philosophy 20:1 (2012): 45–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lefkowitz, D. International Law, Institutional Moral Reasoning, and Secession. Law and Philos 37, 385–413 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-017-9316-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-017-9316-2