Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contextualising landscape perceptions: the role of urban landscape, ecosystem and water system in formation of mental models of a stormwater wetland in Brisbane

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Ecological design used for stormwater management—referred to as Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD)—exemplifies how urban environments can benefit from mimicking natural processes to create multifunctional urban spaces. However, for WSUD to be successfully adopted, it must respond to community landscape perceptions and incorporate their preferences into the designs.

Objectives

This paper investigates whether members of a local community form mental models of how broader urban systems work and whether these inform how specific WSUD landscapes are perceived.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with residents near a stormwater wetland in Brisbane, Australia, provided data to elicit mental models of the wetland and higher-order schemata of urban systems of which it is seen to be a part.

Results

Interviewees perceived the wetland through the lens of four mental models: animal haven, generic water infrastructure, multi-user community space, and pressure valve for urban consolidation. Schemata of broader urban systems manifested in the mental models of the wetland itself. The experience of Millennium Drought, perceived ecosystem demise and urban consolidation policies were important influences.

Conclusions

This research contributes to the understanding of cultural sustainability of ecological design. The results suggest that public acceptance of WSUD and ecological design may benefit from (1) site design that shows effort to tackle priority concerns of the local community, and (2) addressing elements of the understanding of broader urban systems that contradict messages about the site. More broadly, the study demonstrates the importance of context for landscape perception research and offers a method to explore it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Source of imagery: NearMap Australia Pty (used with permission)

Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apostolaki S, Duffy R (2016) Sustainable surface water management. Wiley, New York, pp 105–114

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Appleton J (1996) The experience of landscape. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastien N, Arthur S, McLoughlin M (2012) Valuing amenity: public perceptions of sustainable drainage systems ponds. Water Environ J 26:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belaire JA, Westphal LM, Minor ES (2016) Different social drivers, including perceptions of urban wildlife, explain the ecological resources in residential landscapes. Landsc Ecol 31:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boase N, White M, Gaze W, Redshaw C (2017) Evaluating the mental models approach to developing a risk communication: a scoping review of the evidence. Risk Anal 37:2132–2149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond NR, Lake P, Arthington AH (2008) The impacts of drought on freshwater ecosystems: an Australian perspective. Hydrobiologia 600:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom A, Morss RE, Lazo JK, Demuth JL, Lazrus H, Hudson R (2016) A mental models study of hurricane forecast and warning production. Commun Decis Mak Weather Clim Soc 8:111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs AE (2009) Public support for river restoration A mixed-method study into local residents’ support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains. J Environ Manag 90(8):2680–2689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buys L, Miller E (2012) Residential satisfaction in inner urban higher-density Brisbane, Australia: role of dwelling design, neighbourhood and neighbours. J Environ Plan Manag 55:319–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childers DL, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Marshall V, McGrath B, Pickett ST (2015) An ecology for cities: A transformational nexus of design and ecology to advance climate change resilience and urban sustainability. Sustainability 7:3774–3791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeterier JF (1996) Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 34:27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TC (2001) Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan 54:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (1994) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie MF (2013) Public aesthetic preferences to inform sustainable wetland management in Victoria, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 120:178–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie M (2016) Designing raingardens for community acceptance. Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie M, Green R (2013) Public perceptions of freshwater wetlands in Victoria, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 110:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett G (2016) Sustainable surface water management. Wiley, New York, pp 285–297

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Everett G, Lamond J, Morzillo AT, Chan FKS, Matsler AM (2016) Sustainable drainage systems: helping people live with water. Thomas Telford Ltd, London, pp 94–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF, Ashley R, Butler D, Arthur S, Trowsdale S, Barraud S, Semadeni-Davies A, Bertrand-Krajewski JL (2015) SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more–the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J 12:525–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford HA, Barrett GW, Saunders DA, Recher HF (2001) Why have birds in the woodlands of southern Australia declined? Biol Conserv 97:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost L, Gaynor A, Gregory J, Morgan R, O’Hanlon S, Spearritt P, Young P (2016) Water, history and the Australian city: urbanism, suburbanism and water in a dry continent, 1788–2015. Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception, classic. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landsc Ecol 22:959–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen V, Stange E, Kaltenborn B, Vistad O (2017) Public visual preferences for dead wood in natural boreal forests: the effects of added information. Landsc Urban Plan 158:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadavi S, Kaplan R, Hunter MCR (2015) Environmental affordances: a practical approach for design of nearby outdoor settings in urban residential areas. Landsc Urban Plan 134:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henly-Shepard S, Gray SA, Cox LJ (2015) The use of participatory modeling to promote social learning and facilitate community disaster planning. Environ Sci Policy 45:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikin K, Barton PS, Stirnemann IA, Stein JR, Michael D, Crane M, Okada S, Lindenmayer DB (2014) Multi-scale associations between vegetation cover and woodland bird communities across a large agricultural region. PLoS ONE 9:e97029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie J, Arthur S, Beevers L (2017) Valuing multiple benefits, and the public perception of SUDS ponds. Water 9(2):128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones N, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 16:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. CUP Archive

  • Kim S, An K (2017) Exploring psychological and aesthetic approaches of bio-retention facilities in the urban open space. Sustainability 9(11):2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolkman MJ, Veen AvD, Geurts PATM (2007) Controversies in water management: frames and mental models. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27(7):685–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinster S, O’Neill A, Tanner C, Hoban A, Walsh S (2010) Can we move beyond the credit crunch? WSUD in open space. In: National Conference of the Stormwater Industry Association, Sydney, Australia

  • Leonard R, Walton A, Koth B, Green M, Spinks A, Myers B, Malkin S, Mankad A, Chacko P, Sharma A (2014) Community acceptance of water sensitive urban design: six case studies. Goyder Institute for Water Research, Adelaide, Australia

  • Levänen JO, Hukkinen JI (2013) A methodology for facilitating the feedback between mental models and institutional change in industrial ecosystem governance: a waste management case-study from northern Finland. Ecol Econ 87:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynam T, Mathevet R, Etienne M, Stone-Jovicich S, Leitch A, Jones N, Ross H, DuToit D, Pollard S, Biggs H (2012) Waypoints on a journey of discovery: mental models in human-environment interactions. Ecol Soc 17:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J, Palomo I, Escalera J, Martín-López B, Montes C (2014) Incorporating ecosystem services into ecosystem-based management to deal with complexity: a participative mental model approach. Landsc Ecol 29:1407–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MG (2002) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Morss RE, Demuth JL, Bostrom A, Lazo JK, Lazrus H (2015) Flash flood risks and warning decisions: a mental models study of forecasters, public officials, and media broadcasters in Boulder, Colorado. Risk Anal 35:2009–2028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio LR (2013) Cultivating deep care: integrating landscape ecological research into the cultural dimension of ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol 28:1025–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (2004) Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetland restorations: cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands 24:756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer J, Faust C (2013) Placing nature: culture and landscape ecology. Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landsc Ecol 23:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Kosek SE, Corry RC (2001) meeting public expectations with ecological innovation in riparian landscapes 1 jawra. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37:1439–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Wang Z, Dayrell E (2009) What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landsc Urban Plan 92:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien CD (2015) Sustainable drainage system (SuDS) ponds in Inverness, UK and the favourable conservation status of amphibians. Urban Ecosyst 18(1):321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peron E, Purcell AT, Staats H, Falchero S, Lamb RJ (1998) Models of preference for outdoor scenes: some experimental evidence. Environ Behav 30(3):282–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell AT, Lamb RJ, Mainardi Peron E, Falchero S (1994) Preference or preferences for landscape? J Environ Psychol 14:195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu L, Lindberg S, Nielsen AB (2013) Is biodiversity attractive? On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space. Landsc Urban Plan 119:136–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynor K, Matthews T, Meyere S (2016) Defining the density debate in Brisbane: how urban consolidation is represented in the media. Paper presented at the State of Australian Cities National Conference, Goald Coast, Queensland

  • Sharma A, Pezzaniti D, Myers B, Cook S, Tjandraatmadja G, Chacko P, Chavoshi S, Kemp D, Leonard R, Koth B (2016) Water sensitive urban design: an investigation of current systems, implementation drivers, community perceptions and potential to supplement urban water services. Water 8:272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofoulis Z (2015) The trouble with tanks: unsettling dominant Australian urban water management paradigms. Local Environ 20(5):529–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staats H, Kieviet A, Hartig T (2003) Where to recover from attentional fatigue: an expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. J Environ Psychol 23(2):147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen Jacobsen JK (2007) Use of landscape perception methods in tourism studies: a review of photo-based research approaches. Tour Geogr 9:234–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Y-F (1990) Topophilia: a study of environmental perceptions, attitudes, and values. Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tveit M, Ode Å, Fry G (2006) Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc Res 31:229–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ryn S, Cowan S (2013) Ecological design. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal R, Miller D, Irvine J, Fiorini S, Amar A, Yearley S, Gill R, Dandy N (2014) The influence of information provision on people’s landscape preferences: a case study on understorey vegetation of deer-browsed woodlands. Landsc Urban Plan 124:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallingford, H. (2003) An assessment of the social impacts of sustainable drainage systems in the UK. Report SR 622

  • Winz I, Brierley GJ (2009) Mental models in urban stormwater Management. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference of the system dynamics society, Cambridge

  • Yin RK (2013) Case study research: design and methods. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Zube EH (1987) Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape Ecol 1:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Beata Sochacka acknowledges financial support from International Water Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beata A. Sochacka.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 28 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sochacka, B.A., Bos, J.J. & Dobbie, M.F. Contextualising landscape perceptions: the role of urban landscape, ecosystem and water system in formation of mental models of a stormwater wetland in Brisbane. Landscape Ecol 36, 2599–2617 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01250-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01250-6

Keywords

Navigation