Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The homogenizing influence of agriculture on forest bird communities at landscape scales

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Agricultural expansion is a principal driver of biodiversity loss, but the impacts on community assembly in agro-ecosystems are less clear, especially across regional scales at which agricultural policies are applied.

Objectives

Using forest-breeding birds, we (1) tested whether increased agricultural coverage resulted in species communities that were random or more similar than expected, (2) compared the relative influence of agriculture versus distance in structuring communities, and (3) tested whether different responses to agriculture among functional guilds leads to a change in functional diversity across gradients of agriculture.

Methods

Species abundances were sampled along 229 transects, each 8 km, using citizen science data assembled across a broad region of eastern Canada. Agricultural and natural land cover were each summed within three different-sized buffers (landscapes) around each transect. A null modeling approach was used to measure community similarity.

Results

Communities were most similar between landscapes that had high agricultural coverage and became more dissimilar as their respective landscapes differed more strongly in the amount of agriculture. Community dissimilarity increased with geographic distance up to about 200 km. Dissimilarity with increasing agriculture was largely due to the disappearance of Neotropical migrants, insectivores and foliage-gleaners from the community as agriculture increased. Functional diversity declined with increasing agriculture but less strongly than species richness and only when agriculture exceeded 40% of the landscape.

Conclusions

Our results support the hypothesis that increasing agricultural coverage produces a filtering towards communities of agriculture-tolerant forest birds with a loss of functional diversity and high site-to-site community similarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baselga A, Bonthoux S, Balent G (2015) Temporal beta diversity of bird assemblages in agricultural landscapes: land cover change vs. stochastic processes. PLoS ONE 10:e0127913

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Bryant DM, Cole L, Crick HQP (2002) Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades. J Appl Ecol 39:273–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bregman TP, Sekercioglu CH, Tobias JA (2014) Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: implications for ecosystem function and conservation. Biol Conserv 169:372–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 124:255–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt S, Ramprasad P, Fenech A (2005) Changes in the landscape of southern Ontario, Canada since 1750: impacts of European colonization. In: Fenech A, MacIver D, Auld H, Hansell R (eds) Integrated mapping assessment environment canada. Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada., Toronto, pp 83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011) Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J Appl Ecol 48:1079–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Kraft NJB, Smith KG, Vellend M, Inouye BD (2011) Using null models to disentangle variation in community dissimilarity from variation in α-diversity. Ecosphere 2:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Myers JA (2011) Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos Trans Royal Soc B 366:2351–2363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford HS, Jennings DT (1989) Predation by birds on spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana: functional, numerical and total responses. Ecology 70:152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A (2010) Beta regression in R. J Stat Softw 34:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crins WJ, Gray PA, Uhlig PWC, Wester M (2009) The ecosystems of Ontario. Part 1. Ecozones and ecoregions. Ontario Ministry of Natural Re-sources, Inventory, Monitoring and Assessment Section, Peterborough, Ontario. Technical Report SIB TER IMA TR-01, p 71

  • Díaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:25–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan TM, Flather CH (2002) Relationships among North American songbird trends, habitat fragmentation, and landscape occupancy. Ecol Appl 12:364–374

    Google Scholar 

  • eBird (2018) eBird: An online database of bird distribution and abundance [web application]. eBird, Ithaca, New York. http://www.ebird.org. Accessed September 2018

  • Ekroos J, Heliölä J, Kuussaari M (2010) Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 47:459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2017) North American breeding bird survey canadian trends website. Data Version 2015. Environment Canada, Gatineau

  • Farrell CE, Fahrig L, Mitchell G, Wilson S (2019) Local habitat association does not inform landscape management of threatened birds. Landscape Ecol 34(6):1313–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisette T, Rollin P, Aly Z, Campbell L, Daneshfar B, Filyer P, Smith A, Davidson A, Shang J, Jarvis I (2013) AAFC annual crop inventory. In: The Second International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics 2013, 12–16 August 2013, Fairfax, VA

  • Flohre A, Fischer C, Aavik T, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Bommarco R, Ceryngier P, Clement LW, Dennis C, Eggers S, Emmerson M, Geiger F, Guerrero I, Hawro V, Inchausti P, Liira J, Morales MB, Oñate JJ, Pärt T, Weisser WW, Winqvist C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2011) Agricultural intensification and biodiversity partitioning in European landscapes comparing plants, carabids, and birds. Ecol Appl 21:1772–1781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Rentería D, Rincón A, Valladares F, Yuste JC (2016) Agricultural matrix affects differently the alpha and beta structural and functional diversity of soil microbial communities in a fragmented Mediterranean holm oak forest. Soil Biol Biochem 92:79–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F (2009) Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan JM III, Johnston PW (1992) Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson KA, Bayne E (2000) Effects of forest fragmentation by agriculture on avian communities in the southern boreal mixedwoods of western Canada. Wilson J Ornith 112:373–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson HB, Fahrig L (2014) Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeliazkov A, Mimet A, Chargé R, Jiguet F, Devictor V, Chiron F (2016) Impacts of agricultural intensification on bird communities: new insights from a multi-level and multi-facet approach of biodiversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 216:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones J, Barg JJ, Sillett TS, Veit LM, Robertson RJ (2004) Minimum estimates of survival and population growth for Cerulean Warblers (Dendroica cerulea) breeding in Ontario, Canada. Auk 121:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp DS, Rominger AJ, Zook J, Ranganathan J, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2012) Intensive agriculture erodes β-diversity at large scales. Ecol Lett 15:963–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karp DS, Ziv G, Zook J, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2011) Resilience and stability in bird guilds across tropical countryside. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:21134–21139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer GR, Andersen DE, Buehler DA, Wood PB, Peterson SM, Lehman JA, Aldinger KR, Bulluck LP, Harding S, Jones JA, Loegering JP, Smalling C, Vallender R, Streby HM (2018) Population trends in Vermivora warblers are linked to strong migratory connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E3192–E3200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JF, Whigham DF (1984) Effects of forest fragmentation on breeding bird communities in Maryland, USA. Biol Conserv 28:287–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin AE, Fahrig L (2018) Habitat specialists disperse farther and are more migratory than habitat generalist birds. Ecology 99:2058–2066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26:867–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold T, Scharlemann JPW, Butchart SHM, Sekercioglu CH, Alkemade R, Booth H, Purves DW (2013) Ecological traits affect the response of tropical forest bird species to land-use intensity. Proc R Soc Lond B 280:20122131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North American Bird Conservation Initiative Canada (NABCI) (2012) The State of Canada’s Birds, 2012. Environment Canada, Ottawa, p 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2019) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petit DR, Lynch JF, Hutto RL, Blake JG, Waide RB (1995) Habitat use and conservation in the Neotropics. In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 145–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Podani J, Schmera D (2006) On dendrogram-based measures of functional diversity. Oikos 115:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomara LY, Ruokolainen K, Young KR (2013) Avian species composition across the Amazon River: the roles of dispersal limitation and environmental heterogeneity. J Biogeogr 41:784–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol Lett 3:349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raup D, Crick R (1979) Measurement of faunal similarity in paleontology. J Paleontol 53:1213–1227

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald P (2018) The Birds of North America: https://birdsna.org. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY

  • Rushing CS, Dudash MR, Studds CE, Marra PP (2015) Annual variation in long-distance dispersal driven by breeding and non-breeding season climatic conditions in a migratory bird. Ecography 38:1006–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski Jr DJ, Link WA (2017) The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2015. Version 01.30.2015 USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD

  • Schmiegelow FKA, Machtans CS, Hannon SJ (1997) Are boreal birds resilient to forest fragmentation? An experimental study of short-term community responses. Ecology 78:1914–1932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley DA (2000) The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, Edwards DP (2016) How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 31:68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Rubio M, Wilson S, Leimgruber P, Lookingbill P (2013) Threshold responses of forest birds to landscape changes around exurban development. PLoS ONE 8(6):e67593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/

  • Tilman D (2001) Functional diversity. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 109–120

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20260–20264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 222:1300–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittler R (2008) Source–sink dynamics, dispersal, and landscape effects on North American songbirds. Dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa

  • Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Sekercioglu CH, Dietsch TV, Sodhi NS, Hoehn P, Tylianakis JM (2008) Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89:944–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallejos MAV, Padial AA, Vitule JRS (2016) Human-induced landscape changes homogenize Atlantic Forest bird assemblages through nested species loss. PLoS ONE 11:e0147058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Dorp D, Opdam PFM (1987) Effects of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Land Ecol 1:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellend M, Verheyen K, Flinn KM, Jacquemyn H, Kolb A, Van Calster H, Peterken G, Graae BJ, Bellemare J, Honnay O, Brunet J, Wulf M, Gerhardt F, Hermy M (2007) Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species-environment relationships via agricultural land use. J Ecol 95:567–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltert M, Bobo KS, Sainge NM, Fermon H, Mühlenberg M (2005) From forest to farmland: habitat effects on Afrotropical forest bird diversity. Ecol Appl 15:1351–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W (2014) Elton Traits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95:2027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S, Mitchell GW, Pasher J, McGovern M, Hudson M-AR, Fahrig L (2017) Influence of crop type, heterogeneity and woody structure on avian biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Indic 83:218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S, Saracco JF, Krikun R, Flockhart DT, Godwin CM, Foster KR (2018a) Drivers of demographic decline across the annual cycle of a threatened migratory bird. Sci Rep 8:7316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S, Smith AC, Naujokaitis-Lewis I (2018b) Opposing responses to drought shape population dynamics of declining grassland birds. Divers Distrib 24:1687–1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerberg B, Fink D, La Sorte FA, Hochacka WM, Kelling S (2016) Novel seasonal land cover associations for eastern North American forest birds identified through dynamic species distribution modeling. Divers Distrib 22:717–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada

    Sarah Endenburg, Greg W. Mitchell, Lenore Fahrig & Scott Wilson

  2. Wildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada

    Greg W. Mitchell & Scott Wilson

  3. Landscape Science and Technology Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, 1125 Colonel by Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0H3, Canada

    Patrick Kirby & Jon Pasher

Authors
  1. Sarah Endenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Greg W. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick Kirby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lenore Fahrig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jon Pasher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Scott Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Wilson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 92 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Endenburg, S., Mitchell, G.W., Kirby, P. et al. The homogenizing influence of agriculture on forest bird communities at landscape scales. Landscape Ecol 34, 2385–2399 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00895-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00895-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation