Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying win–win situations in agricultural landscapes: an integrated ecosystem services assessment for Spain

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

European agricultural landscapes are facing contradictory phenomena in that some areas are experiencing unsustainable land-use intensification while others are being abandoned. Specifically, agricultural intensification is increasing resulting in numerous negative environmental impacts on European soils, water and biodiversity; increased crop ecological footprints; and creation of social conflicts and inequalities. Within this context, we mapped and assessed ecosystem services from Spanish agricultural landscapes to identify ecological and economical win–win situations that could provide good examples of sustainable landscape management.

Objectives

We aim to spatially identify gaps and areas of overlap of ecological and economic values of ecosystem services at the national scale for Spanish agricultural landscapes. Additionally, we analyse possible connections among social concerns and preferences related to environmental issues and ecosystem services with economic and ecological values of local agricultural landscapes.

Methods

First, we quantified and mapped the economic value of crop production at the national level. Second, we mapped the ecological value of agricultural landscapes based on the “high nature value farming” index. Third, we explored the spatial correlations between economic and ecological values to identify major agricultural landscape patterns at the national level and specific win–win situations at the local level. Fourth, we conducted a public survey of the Spanish population about environmental concerns and their preferences towards ecosystem services. Fifth, we analysed the links among the social concerns and preferences with the ecological and economic values of agricultural landscapes at the national level.

Results

Our results allow us to better understand the main landscape patterns and help develop more balanced management strategies. For instance, the results show how current landscape management in Spain is polarized between areas with high economic values and areas with high ecological performance. The maps produced also allow the identification of agricultural landscapes with high economic and ecological values that can be used as good examples for sustainable landscape management. Additionally, the public survey revealed that environmental concerns of the Spanish population and the importance the population places on agricultural ecosystem services received very low scores.

Conclusions

The results from this study show that the possibility of balancing and reconciling the supply of ecological and economic values from agricultural landscapes exists in practice. The results help identify areas in Spain where actions should be taken to enhance sustainable landscape planning at the national level. Among the analysed environmental concerns of the Spanish population, the three environmental concerns that had the lowest scores are those that are tightly linked to the type of action needed to shift towards more sustainable agroecological systems. Finally, we discuss how complex interactions among ecosystem services should become part of the planning strategies for new sustainable landscape management at the national level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Reproduced with permission from Paracchini et al. (2008)

Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan E, Manning P, Alt F, Binkenstein J, Blaser S, Blüthgen N, Böhm S, Grassein F, Hölzel N, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, Morris EK, Oelmann Y, Prati D, Renner SC, Rillig MC, Schaefer M, Schloter M, Schmitt B, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Solly E, Sorkau E, Steckel J, Steffen-Dewenter I, Stempfhuber B, Tschapka M, Weiner CN, Weisser WW, Werner M, Westphal C, Wilcke W, Fischer M (2015) Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol Lett 18(8):834–843

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arcidiacono A, Ronchi S, Salata S (2016) Managing multiple ecosystem services for landscape conservation: a green infrastructure in Lombardy region. Procedia Eng 161:2297–2303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthel S, Crumley C, Svedin U (2013) Biocultural refugia: combating the erosion of diversity in landscapes of food production. Ecol Soc 18(4):UNSP-71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaufoy G, Baldock D, Clark J (1994) The nature of farming. Low intensity farming systems in nine European countries. Report IEEP/WWF/JNCC, London, Gland, Peterborough

  • Bowen S, de Mater V (2011) New rural livelihoods or museums of production? Quality food initiatives in practice. J Rural Stud 27(2011):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F, Windhorst W (2009) Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services—a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online 15(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque J-F, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Morcillo MH, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié J-C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caraveli H (2000) A comparative analysis on intensification and extensification in Mediterranean agriculture: dilemmas for LFAs policy. J Rural Stud 16:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486(7401):59–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, DeFries R, Dietz T, Mooney HA, Polasky S, Reid WV, Scholes RJ (2006) Ecology. Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs. Science 314(5797):257–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, Chapman M, Díaz S, Gómez-Baggethun E, Gould R, Hannahs N, Jax K, Klain S, Luck GW, Martín-López B, Muraca B, Norton B, Ott K, Pascual U, Satterfield T, Tadaki M, Taggart J, Turner N (2016) Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc Natl Acd Sci USA 113(6):1462–1465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R, De Farber S, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1987) The value of the World’ s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7(3):260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano L, Martínez-Cortina L, Chico D (2012) An overview of groundwater resources in Spain. In: De Stefano L, Llamas RM (eds) Water, agriculture and the environment in Spain: can we square the circle?. Tailor and Francis, CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Deguines N, Jono C, Baude M, Henry M, Julliard R, Fontaine C (2014) Large-scale trade-off between agricultural intensification and crop pollination services. Front Ecol Environ 12(4):212–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The Future of Food and Farming. COM(2017) 71

  • FAO (2002) Conservation and adaptive management of globally important agricultural heritage systems (GIAHS). Global Environment Facility, Project Concept Note

  • Fischer J, Abson DJ, Butsic V, Chappell MJ, Ekroos J, Hanspach J, Kuemmerle T, Smith HG, von Wehrden H (2014) Land sparing versus land sharing: moving forward. Conserv Lett 7(3):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Goldman R, Goldstein J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ranganathan J, Tallis H (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6(7):380–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García-Llorente M, Haro C, Cruz JL, Benito A (2015) Towards an agroecological transition in periurban agrarian systems in Madrid (Spain). In: Proceedings of the second international conference on agriculture in an urbanizing society reconnecting agriculture and food chains to societal needs. pp 363–364. September 2015 Rome Italy. ISBN 9788890896033

  • García-Llorente M, Pérez-Ramírez I, Sabán de la Portilla C, Haro C, Benito A (2019) Agroecological strategies for reactivating the agrarian sector: the case of Agrolab in Madrid. Sustainability 11:1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez Sal A, Gonzalez Garcıa A (2007) A comprehensive assessment of multifunctional agricultural land-use systems in Spain using a multi-dimensional evaluative model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 120:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Baggethun E, De Groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C (2010) The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ 69:1209–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon LJ, Finlayson CM, Falkenmark M (2010) Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agric Water Manag 97(4):512–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henle K, Alard D, Clitherow J, Cobb P, Firbank L, Kull T, McCracken D, Moritz R, Niemelä J, Rebane Wascher D, Watt A, Young J (2008) Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe—a review. Agric Ecosys Environ 124(1–2):60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infante A, Gonzalez M (2000) “Sustainable de-growth’ in agriculture and food: an agroecological perspective on Spain’s agri-food system. J Clean Prod 38(2013):27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B (2014) Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol Econ 108:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPBES (2015) Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services (deliverable 3(d)). IPBES/4/INF/13

  • Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton ND, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, McGrath FL, Vierikko K, Geneletti D, Sevecke KJ, Pipart N, Primmer E, Mederly P, Schmidtm S, Aragão A, Baral H, Bark RH, Bricenor T, Brogna D, Cabral P, De Vreese R, Liquete C, Mueller H, Peh KS-H, Phelan A, Rincón AR, Rogers SH, Turkelbooma F, Van Reetha W, van Zanten BT, Wam HK, Washbourne CL (2016) A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv 22(December):213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs S, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Dunford RW, Harrison PA, Kelemen E, Saarikoski H, Termansen M, Garcia Llorente M, Gómez-Baggethun E, Kopperoinen L, Luque S, Palomo I, Priess J, Rusch G, Tenerelli P, Turkelboom F, Demeyer R, Hauck J, Smith R (2017) The means determine the end—Pursuing integrated valuation in practice. Ecosyst Serv 17:5–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Koohafkan P, Cruz MJD (2011) Conservation and adaptive management of globally important agricultural heritage systems (GIAHS). J Resour Ecol 2(1):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • La Notte A, Maes J, Dalmazzone S, Crossman ND, Grizzetti B, Bidoglio G (2017) Physical and monetary ecosystem service accounts for Europe: a case study for in-stream nitrogen retention. Ecosyst Serv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler JJ, Lewis DJ, Nelson E, Plantinga AJ, Polasky S, Withey JC, Helmers DP, Martinuzzi S, Pennington D, Radeloff VC (2014) Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(20):7492–7497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • López-García D, Calvet-Mir L, Di Masso M, Espluga J (2018) Multi-actor networks and innovation niches: university training for local Agroecological dynamization. Agric Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9863-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Paracchini M-L, Zulian G (2011) A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services—towards an atlas of ecosystem services. Joint Research Centre, Publications Office of the European Union (Vol. JRC63505). http://doi.org/10.2788/63557

  • MAGRAMA-Ministry of Agriculture (2008) Statistics Yearbooks

  • Malik K, Bhattacharjee S, Bonini A, Calderón C, Fuchs A, Kovacevic M, Kugler M (2013) Human development report 2013 summary. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2013_en_summary.pdf

  • Maréchal A, Hart K, BaldockD, Erjavec E, Rac I, Vanni F, Mantino F (2018) Policy lessons and recommendations from the PEGASUS project. Pegasus Project, Deliverable 5.4. http://pegasus.ieep.eu/resources-list#publications

  • Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, Montes C (2014) Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol Indic 37(PART A):220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney H, Mace G (2009) Biodiversity policy challenges. Science (New York) 325(5947):1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Iwamura T (2007) Global-scale mapping of economic benefits from agricultural lands: implications for conservation priorities. Biol Conserv 140(1–2):40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oteros-Rozas E, Ontillera-Sánchez R, Sanosa P, Gómez-Baggethun E, Reyes-García V, González J (2013) Traditional ecological knowledge among transhumant pastoralists in Mediterranean Spain. Ecol Soc 18(3):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Xiao Y, Polasky S, Liu J, Xu W, Wang Q, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Rao E, Jiang L, Lu F, Wang X, Yang G, Gong S, Wu B, Zeng Y, Yang W, Daily GC (2016) Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 352(6292):1455–1459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paracchini ML, Oppermann R (2011) Public goods and ecosystem services delivered by HNV farmland. In: Oppermann R, Beaufoy G, Jones G (eds) High nature value farming in Europe—35 European Countries—experiences and perspectives. Verlag Regionalkultur, Ubstadt-Weiher, pp 446–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Paracchini ML, Petersen J-E, Hoogeveen Y, Bamps C, Burfield I, van Swaay C (2008) High nature value farmland in Europe—an estimate of the distribution patterns on the basis of land cover and biodiversity data. Institute for Environment and Sustainability Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg. http://doi.org/10.2788/8891

  • Pineda F (2001) Intensification, rural abandonment and nature conservation in Spain. In: Bunce RGH, Pérez-Solba M, Elbersen BS, Prados MJ, Andersen E, Bell M, Smeets PJAM (eds) Examples of European agri-environment schemes and livestock systems and their influence on Spanish cultural landscapes. Alterra Rapport, Wageningen, pp 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingali PL (2012) Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:12302–12308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Quintas-Soriano C, Martín-López B, Santos-Martín F, Loureiro M, Montes C, Benayas J, García-Llorente M (2016) Ecosystem services values in Spain: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Policy 55:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Elmqvist T, Hejnowicz AP, Polasky S (2013) Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach. Front Ecol Environ 11(5):268–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs J (2010) Monitoring the world’ s agriculture. Nature 466(29):558–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Martín F, García Llorente M, Quintas-Soriano C, Zorrilla-Miras P, Martín-López B, Loureiro M, Benayas J, Montes M (2016) Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment: socio-economic valuation of ecosystem services in Spain. Synthesis of the key findings. Biodiversity Foundation of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Madrid, p 68. ISBN 978-84-608-8776-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Martín F, Zorrilla-Miras P, Palomo I, Montes C, Benayas J, Maes J (2019) Protecting nature is necessary but not sufficient for conserving ecosystem services: a comprehensive assessment along a gradient of land-use intensity in Spain. Ecosyst Serv 35(2019):43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schägner JP, Brander L, Maes J, Hartje V (2013) Mapping ecosystem services’ values: current practice and future prospects. Ecosyst Serv 4:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selomane O, Reyers B, Biggs R, Tallis H, Polasky S (2015) Towards integrated social–ecological sustainability indicators: exploring the contribution and gaps in existing global data. Ecol Econ 118:140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Wehrden H, Abson DJ, Beckmann M, Cord AF, Klotz S, Seppelt R (2014) Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history. Landscape Ecol 29(6):941–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2013) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol 2013(28):999–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Xiao Y, Zhang J, Yang W, Zhang L, Hull V, Wang Z, Zheng H, Liu J, Polasky S, Jiang L, Xiao Y, Shi X, Rao E, Lu F, Wang X, Daily GC, Ouyang Z (2017) Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(7):1601–1606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zorrilla-Miras P, Palomo I, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Lomas PL, Montes C (2014) Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 122:160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was designed as part of the Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment (http://www.ecomilenio.es/). The Biodiversity Foundation of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment financially supported this work. Financial support was also provided by the project ECOGRADIENTES, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant No. CGL2014-53782-P). MGL was funded by the Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology, co-funded by the Social European Fund (Doc-INIA CCAA). PZM was partially funded by the Subprograma INNCORPORA Torres-Quevedo PTQ-11-04523 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant agreement No. 798867. We want to thank the work of data processing to David Mateos-Pascual (Terrativa S. Coop. Mad), Mario Ballester and Irene Paredes (CEIGRAM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Autonomous University of Madrid, C-201, c. Darwin, 2, Edificio de Biología, 28049, Madrid, Spain

    F. Santos-Martín, M. García-Llorente, C. Montes & J. Benayas

  2. Icatalist S.L, Madrid, Spain

    P. Zorrilla-Miras

  3. Department of Applied Research and Agricultural Extension, Madrid Institute for Rural, Agricultural and Food Research and Development (IMIDRA), Alcalá De Henares, Spain

    M. García-Llorente

  4. Social-Ecological Interactions in Agricultural Systems, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany

    C. Quintas-Soriano

  5. Department of Ecology, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain

    A. Gómez Sal

  6. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

    M. L. Paracchini

Authors
  1. F. Santos-Martín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Zorrilla-Miras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. García-Llorente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Quintas-Soriano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Montes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Benayas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Gómez Sal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. L. Paracchini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Santos-Martín.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos-Martín, F., Zorrilla-Miras, P., García-Llorente, M. et al. Identifying win–win situations in agricultural landscapes: an integrated ecosystem services assessment for Spain. Landscape Ecol 34, 1789–1805 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00852-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00852-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation