Skip to main content
Log in

‘She Reigns and He Does Not Govern’: The Discourse of the Anxious Hysteric in Post-apartheid South Africa

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anxiety and hysteria proliferate in contemporary postcolonial, post-apartheid South Africa, where it is always intimately related to the question of the Law and, specifically ‘the Constitution’. I begin by tracing Freud’s discussions of the co-occurrence of anxiety with hysteria, after which I consider Lacan’s unique account of anxiety as the ‘lack of the support of the lack’. I continue to offer a re-interpretation of the Master’s discourse (here, of liberal authority), namely as a discourse that in its very structure exposes the (postcolonial) subject to the production of the object of anxiety. I then consider two possible ways in which anxiety may affect the discourse of the Hysteric: acting out and the passage à l’acte. I conclude that Lacan’s shorthand for the relationship between the Hysteric and the Master is also an accurate description of the present moment in the postcolony: ‘she reigns and he does not govern’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The first prominent wave of post-apartheid student protests occurred in March 2015 at the University of Cape Town with students agitating for the removal of a statue of Cecil John Rhodes that, at the time, was located at a focal point on the university’s campus (Roelf 2015). The initial demand for the removal of the statue quickly escalated into a general demand for the ‘decolonization’ of the university as such—a demand that covered everything from course content, to artworks publically on display at the university’s campuses, to names of buildings, to bureaucratic processes, to the glaring lack of transformation in the racial composition of the university’s academic staff, to high tuition fees, etc. (Pather 2015). For a comprehensive account of this first wave of student protests, which eventually culminated in a nationwide protest in October 2016 under the banner #FeesMustFall, see generally Booysen (2016) and, in particular, Chapter 24 and 25 in Ray (2016, pp. 352–374).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article would have remained impossible to write without the exchanges that I have been privileged to have, over the past few months, with Pierre de Vos, Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela, Deborah Posel, Juliet Rogers, Jacqueline Rose, Mark Solms, and Karin van Marle. I gratefully acknowledge financial assistance from the South African National Research Foundation, the University of Cape Town Research Committee and the University of Cape Town Faculty of Law Research Committee. André Barnard-Naudé has been my unwavering source of support in these anxious times.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaco Barnard-Naudé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barnard-Naudé, J. ‘She Reigns and He Does Not Govern’: The Discourse of the Anxious Hysteric in Post-apartheid South Africa. Law Critique 28, 267–287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-017-9214-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-017-9214-7

Keywords

Navigation