Abstract
This study concerns teaching and learning development in science through collaboration between science teachers and researchers. At the core was the ambition to integrate research outcomes of science education—here ‘didactic models’—with teaching practice, aligned with professional development. The phase where the collaboration moves from initial establishment towards a stable practice is investigated. The study aims to identifying features of formation and exploring consequences for the character of contact between research and teaching. Specific questions are “What may be identified as actions and arrangements impacting the quality and continuation of the emerging practice?” and “What and in what ways may support teacher growth?” The analysis draws on practice architectures as a theoretical framework and specifically investigates the initial meetings as a practice-node for a new practice, empirically drawing on documented reflections on science teaching, primarily from meetings and communication. The results take the form of an analytical-narrative account of meetings that focused planning, enactment and reflection on teaching regarding the human body. We identify enabling actions such as collaborative work with concrete material from the classroom and arrangements such as the regular meetings and that the collaborative group had a core of shared competence—in science teaching and learning. Constraining were actions such as introducing research results with weak connection to practical action in the school practice and arrangements such as differences between school and university practice architectures and the general ‘oppression’ of teachers’ classroom practice. The discussion includes reflections on researchers’ roles and on a research and practice base for school development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 17(5), 613–649.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Buck, G. A., Latta, M. A. M., & Leslie-Pelecky, D. L. (2007). Learning how to make inquiry into electricity and magnetism discernible to middle level teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 377–397. doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9053-8
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Liberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 45–58). New York: Teachers College Press.
Cole, A., & Knowles, G. (1993). Teacher development partnership research: A focus on methods and issues. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 473–495. Retrieved from http://aer.sagepub.com/
Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Forsberg, E., & Wermke, W. (2012). Knowledge sources and autonomy: German and Swedish teachers’ continuing professional development of assessment knowledge. Professional Development in Education, 38, 741–758. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.694369
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). London: Cassel.
Glennon, C., Hinton, C., Callahan, T., & Fischer, K. W. (2013). School-based research. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, 30–34.
Goodnough, K. (2010). Teacher learning and collaborative action research: Generating a ‘knowledge-of-practice’’ in the context of science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 917–935. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9215-y
Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., Mockler, N., Ponte, P., & Rönnerman, K. (2013). Facilitating practitioner research: Developing transformational partnerships. London: Routledge.
Hargreaves, A. (2004). Inclusive and exclusive educational change: Emotional responses of teachers and implications for leadership. School Leadership & Management, 24, 287–309. doi:10.1080/1363243042000266936
Harlow, D. B. (2014). An investigation of how a physics professional development course influenced the teaching practices of five elementary school teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 119–139. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9346-z
Harris, A. (2001). Department Improvement and School Improvement: A missing link? British Educational Research Journal, 27, 477–486. doi:10.1080/01411920120071470
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29, 449–471. doi:10.1080/0305498032000153025
Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: Pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40, 5–28. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30030936
Huberman, M. (1994). Research utilization: The state of the art. Knowledge and Policy, 7, 13–33. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02696290#page-1
Hutchins, K. L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2012). Science faculty belief systems in a professional development program: Inquiry in college laboratories. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 867–887. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9294-z
Ingerman, Å., & Wickman, P.-O. (2015). Towards a teachers’ professional discipline—Shared responsibility for didactic models in research and practice. In P. Burnard, B.-M. Apelgren, & N. Cabaroglu (Eds.), Transformative teacher research: In theory and practice for the C21st. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
Johansson, A.-M., & Wickman, P.-O. (2011). A pragmatist approach to learning progressions. In B. Hudson & M. A. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 47–59). Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Kemmis, S. (2009). Understanding professional practice: A synoptic framework. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. (2008). Situating practice in practice: Practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In S. Kemmis & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Enabling practice: Challenges for education (pp. 37–64). Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (Eds.). (2008). Enabling practice: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. London: Springer.
Kennedy, A. (2014). Understanding continuing professional development: The need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional Development in Education, 40, 688–697. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.955122
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetoric’s of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
Lendahls Rosendahl, B., & Rönnerman, K. (2006). Facilitating school improvement: The problematic relationship between researchers and practitioners. Journal of In-service Education, 32, 497–509. doi:10.1080/13674580601024457
Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1, 2–31. doi:10.1002/rev3.3001
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & G. N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.
Melville, W., & Wallace, J. (2007). Subject, relationships and identity: The role of a science department in the professional learning of a non-university science educated teacher. Research in Science Education, 37, 155–169. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-9020-y
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nordholm, D., & Blossing, U. (2013). Designing temporary systems: Exploring local school improvement intentions in the Swedish context. Journal of Educational Change, 15, 57–75. doi:10.1007/s10833-013-9211-z
Olander, C. (2010). Towards an interlanguage of biological evolution: Exploring students’ talk and writing as an arena for sense-making. Acta Universitatis Gothenburgensis: Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/21558
Opfer, D. V., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81, 376–407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London: The Nuffield Foundation.
Pang, M. F., & Lo, M. L. (2012). Learning study: Helping teachers to use theory, develop professionally, and produce new knowledge to be shared. Instructional Science, 40, 589–606. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9191-4
Reynolds, D., Chapman, C., Kelly, A., Muijs, D., & Sammons, P. (2011). Educational effectiveness: The development of the discipline, the critiques, the defense, and the present debate. Effective Education, 3, 109–127. doi:10.1080/19415532.2011.686168
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rönnerman, K., & Olin, A. (2014). Research circles—Constructing a space for elaborating on being a teacher leader in preschools. In K. Rönnerman & P. Salo (Eds.), Lost in practice: Transforming Nordic educational action research (pp. 95–112). Rotterdam: Sense.
Rönnerman, K., & Salo, P. (2012). ‘Collaborative and action research’ within education—A Nordic perspective. Nordic Studies in Education, 32, 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/np
Seel, H. (1999). Didaktik as the professional science of teachers. TNTEE Publications, 2, 85–93.
Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Sleeter, C. (2014). Toward teacher education research that informs policy. Educational Researcher, 43, 146–153. doi:10.3102/0013189X14528752
Somekh, B. (2005). Action research: A methodology for change and development. England: McGraw-Hill International.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Visscher, A. J., & Witziers, B. (2004). Subject departments as professional communities? British Educational Research Journal, 30, 785–800. doi:10.1080/0141192042000279503
Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37, 469–479. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327154
Wickman, P.-O., & Ligozat, F. (2011). Scientific literacy as action: Consequences for content progression. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P. O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 145–159). New York: Routledge.
Zeichner, K. M. (2005). A research agenda for teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 737–759). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the contributions of all participants in the collaboration: the teachers, the headmasters, Clas Olander and Marlene Sjöberg. All project members, who also include the project leader Per-Olof Wickman, Karim Hamza, Jesus Piqueras and Marcus Angelin, have continuously contributed in discussions and development of ideas. The research project was funding by the Swedish Research Council (VR-UVK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Olin, A., Ingerman, Å. Features of an Emerging Practice and Professional Development in a Science Teacher Team Collaboration with a Researcher Team. J Sci Teacher Educ 27, 607–624 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9477-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9477-0