Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of Lesson Study Combined with Content Representation in the Planning of Physics Lessons During Field Practice to Develop Pedagogical Content Knowledge

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

Recent research, both internationally and in Norway, has clearly expressed concerns about missing connections between subject-matter knowledge, pedagogical competence and real-life practice in schools. This study addresses this problem within the domain of field practice in teacher education, studying pre-service teachers’ planning of a Physics lesson. Two means of intervention were introduced. The first was lesson study, which is a method for planning, carrying out and reflecting on a research lesson in detail with a learner and content-centered focus. This was used in combination with a second means, content representations, which is a systematic tool that connects overall teaching aims with pedagogical prompts. Changes in teaching were assessed through the construct of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). A deductive coding analysis was carried out for this purpose. Transcripts of pre-service teachers’ planning of a Physics lesson were coded into four main PCK categories, which were thereafter divided into 16 PCK sub-categories. The results showed that the intervention affected the pre-service teachers’ potential to start developing PCK. First, they focused much more on categories concerning the learners. Second, they focused far more uniformly in all of the four main categories comprising PCK. Consequently, these differences could affect their potential to start developing PCK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K. (2007). Perspectives: Action research: Inquiring into science teaching and learning. Science and Children, 45(1), 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allsopp, D. H., DeMarie, D., Alvarez-McHatton, P., & Doone, E. (2006). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Connecting courses with field experiences. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), The handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science?: Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (Ed.). (2006). Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Loughran, J. (Eds.). (2015). Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, U., & Koballa, T. (2007). Mentor advice giving in an alternative certification program for secondary science teaching: Opportunities and roadblocks in developing a knowledge base for teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 817–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canrinus, E. T., Bergem, O. K., Klette, K., & Hammerness, K. (2015). Coherent teacher education programmes: Taking a student perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 0, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, M. (2005). Exploring “lesson study” in teacher preparation. In H. L. Chicl & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 305–312). Melbourne: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 41–52). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. London: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerness, K., & Klette, K. (2015). Indicators of quality in teacher education: Looking at features of teacher education from an international perspective. In G. K. LeTendre & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), Promoting and sustaining a quality teacher workforce (Vol. 27, pp. 239–277). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, UK.

  • Handal, G., & Lauvås, P. (1987). Promoting reflective teaching: Supervision in practice. Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. C., Alston, A. S., & Murata, A. (Eds.). (2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartas, D. (2010). Educational research and inquiry. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of experienced science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1321–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2013). Enhancing the practicum experience for pre-service chemistry teachers through collaborative CoRe design with mentor teachers. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9346-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., & Ahtee, M. (2006). Comparing primary student teachers’ attitudes, subject knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge needs in a physics activity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 503–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, E., Gullberg, A., Attorps, I., Thorén, I., & Tärneberg, R. (2011). Prospective teachers’ initial conceptions about pupils’ difficulties in science and mathematics: A potential resource in teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 843–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M., & Alias, M. (2005). Exploiting variations in concept map morphology as a lesson-planning tool for trainee teachers in higher education. Journal of In-Service Education, 31, 569–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lannin, J. K., Webb, M., Chval, K., Arbaugh, F., Hicks, S., Taylor, C., et al. (2013). The development of beginning mathematics teacher pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1343–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1999). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: How research lessons improve Japanese education. Improving Schools, 2(1), 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (2nd ed.). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1301–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). London: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marble, S. (2007). Inquiring into teaching: Lesson study in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 935–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2010). National curriculum regulation for teacher education. Oslo.

  • Mulhall, P., Berry, A., & Loughran, J. (2003). Frameworks for representing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. (2001). Teachers knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 807–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munthe, E., Helgevold, N., & Bjuland, R. (2015). Lesson Study i utdanning og praksis. Cappelen damm.

  • Murata, A., & Pothen, B. (2011). Lesson study in preservice elementary mathematics courses: Connecting emerging practice and understanding. In A. Alston, L. Hart, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1281–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2011). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 669–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOKUT. (2006). Evaluering av allmennlærerutdanningen i Norge, Del 1: Hovedrapport. Oslo: NOKUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgesnettrådet. (2002). Evaluering av allmennlærerutdanningen ved fem norske institusjoner. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • NVivo, [Computer Software]. (2014). (Version 10). Doncaster, AU: QSR.

  • Ottesen, E. (2007). Reflection in teacher education. Reflective Practice, 8, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, K., Ponce de León, A. M., Rembado, F. M., & Garritz, A. (2008). Undergraduate professors’ pedagogical content knowledge: The case of “amount of substance”. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1389–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongsanon, K., Akerson, V., & Rogers, M. (2011). Exploring the use of lesson study to develop elementary preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching nature of science. Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Orlando, FL: NARST.

  • Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1365–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teachers learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81, 530–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Reasearcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 14–26). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skagen, K. (2000). Kunnskap og handling i pedagogisk veiledning. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., & Girod, M. (2003). John Dewey & psychologizing the subject-matter: Big ideas, ambitious teaching, and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundli, L. (2007). Mentoring: A new mantra for education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbert, J. E., McLoughlin, M. W., & Rowan, B. (1993). Understanding context effects on secondary school teaching. Teachers College Record, 95, 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41, 26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiland, I., Akerson, V. L., Rogers, M. P., & Pongsanon, K. (2010). Lesson study as a tool for engaging preservice teachers in reflective practice. Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.

  • Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present research was supported by the Norwegian Research Council, Grant No. 212276.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway

    Martin Vogt Juhler

Authors
  1. Martin Vogt Juhler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Vogt Juhler.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Juhler, M.V. The Use of Lesson Study Combined with Content Representation in the Planning of Physics Lessons During Field Practice to Develop Pedagogical Content Knowledge. J Sci Teacher Educ 27, 533–553 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9473-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9473-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation