Skip to main content
Log in

Critiquing Science Lessons for their Authenticity as a Means of Evaluating Teacher-Candidate Understanding of the Nature of Science

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

This inquiry uses teacher-candidate critiques of science lessons as a means of evaluating the effectiveness of an instructor's pedagogical approach to promote teacher candidate understanding of the nature of science (NOS) in a science methods course. Three cohorts of teacher candidates enrolled in a middle-years teacher education program were required to evaluate science lessons for their authenticity based on their developing understanding of the nature of science. The results indicated that the most detailed and accurate analysis of the authenticity of the lessons occurred in the cohort where the nature of science was developed (a) explicitly throughout the course, (b) through the use of exemplars of historical science development, and (c) through a setting that encouraged collaborative consideration of the nature of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflective orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 521–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., p. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashweh, M. H. (1996). Science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understandings of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1999). Avoiding de-natured science. Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht: The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? Science Education, 71, 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite, B. E., & MacIntyre, W. R. (2003). Professional science knowledge and self-efficacy: A vignette study. STERpapers. In R. K. Coll (Ed.), STERpapers 2003 (pp. 58–80). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Centre for Science & Technology Education Research.

  • Martin, B., Kass, H., & Brouwer, W. (1990). Authentic science: A diversity of meanings. Science Education, 74, 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association (2001). Project 2061: The nature of science. Retrieved September 14, 2003, from http://www.project2061.org/publications/ sfaa/online/chap1.htm

  • Reiss, M. J. (1993). Science education for a pluralist society. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinner, A. (1995). The current status of textbooks in schools. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

 

 

About this article

Cite this article

Lewthwaite, B. Critiquing Science Lessons for their Authenticity as a Means of Evaluating Teacher-Candidate Understanding of the Nature of Science. J Sci Teacher Educ 18, 109–124 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9024-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9024-5

Keywords

Navigation