Skip to main content
Log in

Dysfunctional Beliefs and Personality Traits

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the pattern of associations between dimensions of personality dysfunction, dysfunctional beliefs, and adverse emotional outcomes. We recruited two samples of undergraduates (n = 167; n = 104). Dysfunctional beliefs showed positive correlations with pathological personality dimensions Negative Emotionality, Introversion, and Psychoticism, and negative correlations with Big Five dimensions of Emotional Stability, Conscientiousness, Openness, and Conscientiousness. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that dysfunctional beliefs are predictive of adverse emotional outcomes above and beyond dimensions of personality dysfunction. Dysfunctional beliefs also mediated the relationship between personality traits (Negative Emotionality, Emotional Stability) and important emotional outcomes like depression, anxiety, anger, demoralization and cynicism. The implication of the mediation analyses is that dimensions of personality (i.e., Negative Emotionality, Emotional Stability) have their effect on a variety of affective outcomes by operating through the mechanism of dysfunctional beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We conducted post hoc regression analyses of study 1 data and study 2 data to examine the associations between personality dimensions and dysfunctional attitudes. In a multiple regression analysis with all five pathological personality dimensions as predictors and DAS-SF1 as the dependent variable, only Negative Emotionality (p < .001) and Introversion (p = .024) had Beta values that were positive and significant. Using study 2 data we conducted a parallel multiple regression analysis with all five pathological personality dimensions as predictors and DAS-SF2 as the dependent variable. Only Negative Emotionality (p = .002) was significant. Also using study 2 data we ran a separate multiple regression analysis with the Big Five dimensions as predictors of DAS-SF2. Emotional Stability, which was negatively related to dysfunctional attitudes, was the only predictor that was significant (p = .01). Thus, we have good evidence that dysfunctional attitudes are positively associated with Negative Emotionality, modest evidence of an association with Introversion, and good evidence of a negative association with Emotional Stability. This study provides little evidence about which specific types of dysfunctional beliefs, if any, are associated with the other dimensions of personality and personality pathology. As noted previously, our measures of dysfunctional beliefs reflected a composite of 'need for approval' and 'need for achievement', and we were unable to extract sub-factors of dysfunctional beliefs. Future research should explore unique associations between other classes of dysfunctional beliefs (e.g., pessimism, demandingness, condemnation of others, etc.) and dimensions of personality other than Negative Emotionality, Introversion, and Emotional Stability.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual—Text revision (DSM-IV-TR) (4th ed., revised). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz, A., Dreessen, L., Schouten, E., & Weertman, A. (2004). Beliefs in personality disorders: A test with the Personality Disorder Belief Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1215–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy for emotional disorders. New York, NY: International University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (2005). Cognitive therapy for challenging problems: What to do when the Basics Don’t Work. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Butler, A. C., Brown, G. K., Dahlsgaard, K. K., Newman, C. F., & Beck, J. S. (2001). Dysfunctional beliefs discriminate personality disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39(10), 1213–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00099-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Davis, D. D., & Freeman, A. (2015). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Haigh, E. A. P. (2014). Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beevers, C. G., Strong, D. R., Bjorn, M., Pilkonis, P. A., & Miller, I. W. (2007). Efficiently assessing negative cognition in depression: An item response theory analysis of the dysfunctional attitude scale. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI–2–RF: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhar, S. S., Beck, A. T., & Butler, A. C. (2012). Beliefs and personality disorders: An overview of the personality beliefs questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bieling, P. J., Beck, A. T., & Brown, G. K. (2000). The sociotropy-autonomy scale: Structure and implications. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(6), 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005599714224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring (Rev ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. C., Beck, A. T., & Cohen, L. H. (2007). The personality belief questionnaire-short form: Development and preliminary findings. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9041-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Winter, J. C. F., & Dodou, D. (2012). Factor recovery by principal factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39(4), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2011.610445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1983). The SCL-90 R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual II. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, R., & Tafrate, R. C. (2004). Anger disorders scale: Manual. Toronto, ON: Multi Health Systems, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotional in psychotherapy: A comprehensive method of treating human disturbance. Revised and updated. New York: Birch Lane Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, J. C., DeRubeis, R. J., & Beck, A. T. (2012). Dysfunctional cognitions in personality disorder: The structure and validity of the Personality Belief Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 42, 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291711001711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, A. R., Finn, J. A., McNulty, J. L., & Shields, S. M. (2012). The personality psychopathology—Five (PSY-5): Recent constructive replication and assessment literature review. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., Finn, J. A., Reynolds, S. M., Shields, S. M., & Arbisi, P. (2014). The MMPI–2–RF personality psychopathology five (PSY–5–RF) scales: Development and validity research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.823439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, C. J., Schade, N., Kreuger, R. F., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. (2013). Connecting DSM-5 personality traits and pathological beliefs: Toward a unifying model. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9332-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. Released. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 210. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larstone, R. M., Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., Vernon, P. A., & Wolf, H. (2002). The relationship between Eysenck’s P–E–N model of personality, the five factor model of personality, and traits delineating personality dysfunction. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00132-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponterotto, J. G., & Ruckdeschel, D. E. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzer, J. L., & Beck, A. T. (1996). A cognitive theory of personality disorders. In J. F. Clarkin & M. F. Lenzenweger (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (pp. 36–105). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samar, S. M., Walton, K. E., & McDermut, W. (2013). Personality traits predict irrational beliefs. Journal of Rational Emotive and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy., 31, 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-013-0172-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1992). The new uniform T scores for the MMPI-2: Rationale. Derivation, and Appraisal Psychological Assessment, 4(2), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trull, T. J., Goodwin, A. H., Schopp, L. H., Hillenbrand, T. L., & Schuster, T. (1993). Psychometric properties of a cognitive measure of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61(3), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6103_10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vîslă, A., Flückiger, C., Grosse Holtforth, M., & David, D. (2016). Irrational beliefs and psychological distress: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, A. (1979). Dysfunctional attitude scale: A validation study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1182.

  • Young, J. E., Klosko, J., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilson McDermut.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McDermut, W., Pantoja, G. & Amrami, Y. Dysfunctional Beliefs and Personality Traits. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 37, 338–357 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-019-00315-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-019-00315-5

Keywords

Navigation