Skip to main content
Log in

Welding Defect Classification from Simulated Ultrasonic Signals

  • Published:
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nondestructive testing is widely used to detect and to size up discontinuities embedded in a material. Among the several ultrasonic techniques, time of flight diffraction (TOFD) combines high speed inspection, high sizing reliability and low rate of incorrect results. However, the classification of defects through ultrasound signals acquired by the TOFD technique depends heavily on the knowledge and experience of the operator and thus, this classification is still frequently questioned. Besides, this task requires long processing time due to the large amount of data to be analyzed. Nevertheless, computational tools for pattern recognition can be employed to analyze a high amount of data with large efficiency. In the present work, simulation of ultrasound propagation in two-dimensional media containing, each one, different kinds of modeled discontinuities which mimic defects in welded joints were performed. Clustering (k-means) and classification (principal component analysis and k-nearest neighbors) algorithms were employed to associate each simulated ultrasound signal with its corresponding modeled defects. The results for each method were analyzed, discussed and compared. The results are very promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaufman, Leonard, Rousseeuw, Peter J.: Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis, vol. 344. Wiley, New York (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Haykin, S.S.: Neural Networks and Learning Machines, vol. 3. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Webb, Andrew R.: Statistical Pattern Recognition. Wiley, New York (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Silk, M.G., Lidington, B.H.: Defect sizing using an ultrasonic time-delay approach. Br. J. Non-Destr. Test. 17(2), 33–36 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wooh, Shi-Chang, Shi, Yijun: A simulation study of the beam steering characteristics for linear phased arrays. Non-Destr. Eval. 18(2), 39–57 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogilvy, J.A., Temple, J.A.G.: Diffraction of elastic waves by cracks: application to time-of-flight inspection. Ultrasonics 21(6), 259–269 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Temple, J.A.G.: Predicted ultrasonic responses for pulse-echo inspections. Br. J. Non-Destr. Test. 28(3), 145–154 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baskaran, G., Lakshmana Rao, C., Balasubramaniam, K.: Simulation of the tofd technique using the finite element method. Insight-Non-Destr. Test. Cond. Monit. 49(11), 641–646 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghose, B., Balasubramaniam, K., Krishnamurthy, C.V.,Rao, A.S.: Two dimensional fem simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation in isotropic solid media using comsol. In COMSOL Conference (2010)

  10. Orfanidis, S.J.: Introduction to Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Moura, E.P., Siqueira, M.H.S., da Silva, R.R., Rebello, J.M.A.: Welding defect pattern recognition in tofd signals part 2. Non-linear classifiers. Insight-Non-Destr. Test. Cond. Monit. 47(12), 783–787 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jolliffe, Ian: Principal Component Analysis. Wiley Online Library, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Varella, C.A.A.: Análise de componentes principais. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Moura, E.P., Vieira, A.P., Gonçalves, L.L.: Fluctuation analyses for pattern classification in nondestructive materials inspection. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 1, 262869 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rousseeuw, P.J.: Rousseeuw. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Davies, D.L., Bouldin, D.W.: A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2, 224–227 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anil, K.: Jain. Data clustering: 50 years beyond k-means. Pattern recognition letters 31(8), 651–666 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Petrovic, S.: A comparison between the silhouette index and the davies-bouldin index in labelling ids clusters. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Workshop of Secure IT Systems, pp 53–64 (2006)

  19. Dimitriadou, E., Dolničar, S., Weingessel, A.: An examination of indexes for determining the number of clusters in binary data sets. Psychometrika 67(1), 137–159 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elineudo P. de Moura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murta, R.H.F., Vieira, F.d.A., Santos, V.O. et al. Welding Defect Classification from Simulated Ultrasonic Signals. J Nondestruct Eval 37, 40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0496-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0496-y

Keywords

Navigation