Skip to main content
Log in

K – Shrinkage Function for ECG Signal Denoising

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ECG signals is a graphical way of recording the electrical actions of the heart for the various diagnostic purposes. ECG signals are affected by various noises such as Electrode Contact, Baseline Wandering, Motion artifact, Power-line interference, Muscle Contractions, and Electrosurgical noise during data acquisition. Denoising is a technique which is used for removing the noise in ECG signals which keeps the useful information. In this paper, a new category of Wavelet shrinkage methods is proposed. The white Gaussian noise is mixed with the ECGs for simulation and tested with the new class of shrinkage function and is compared with the other wavelet shrinkage functions such as hard and soft shrinkage. The performance measures such as Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) and Percent Root mean – square Difference (PRD) etc. are used to examine the performance of various shrinkage functions. The experimental result shows that it gives better MSE over conventional shrinkage functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friesen G. M. et al., A comparison of the noise sensitivity of nine QRS detection algorithms. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37:85–98,1990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Donoho, D.L. De-noising by soft thresholding, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 41 (1994) 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gao, H.-Y., and Bruce, A. G., Waveshrink with firm shrinkage. Stat. Sin. 7:855–874, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce, A. G. and Gao, H.–Y. (1995). WaveShrink: Shrinkage functions and thresholds. In wavelet applications in signal and image processing III, 2569, Ed. A. F. Laine and M. A. Unser, pp. 270–83. San Diego, CA: Int. Soc. Optic. Eng.

  5. Bruce, A. G., and Gao, H.-Y., Understanding {W}ave{S}hring: Variance and bias estimation. Biometrika 83:727–745, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Breiman, L., Better subset regression using the nonnegative garrote. Technometrics 37(4):373–384, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao, H., Wavelet shrinkage denoising using the non-negative garrote the non-negative garrote. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7(4):469–488, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Poornachandra, S., and Kumaravel, N., Hyper-trim shrinkage for denoising of ECG signal. Digital Signal Processing 15(3): 317–327, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Poornachandra, S., and Kumaravel, N., A novel method for the elimination of power line frequency in ECG signal using hyper shrinkage function. Digital Signal Processing 18(2), 116–126, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poornachandra, S., Wavelet-based denoising using subband dependent threshold for ECG signals. Digital Signal Processing 18(1):49–55, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Poornachandra, S., and Kumaravel, N., Subband-adaptive shrinkage for denoising of ECG signals. EURASIP Journal of Applied Signal Processing 1–10, 2006.

  12. Üstündağ, M., Gökbulut, M., Şengür, A., and Ata, F., Denoising of weak ECG signals by using wavelet analysis and fuzzy thresholding. Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics 1(4):135–140, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saranya, S. S., and Poornachandra, S., Fuzzy logic based thresholding for hyper shrinkage. International Journal of Electrical Engineering 6(4):395–403, 2013.

  14. Selvakumarasamy, K., Poornachandra, S., and Amutha, R., Subband adaptive shrinkage function using fuzzy logic. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal 8(1):445–451, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Durand, S., and Froment, J., Artifact free signal denoising with wavelets. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP ’01), vol. 6, pp. 3685–3688, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, May 2001.

  16. He, H., Wang, Z., and Tan, Y., Noise reduction of ECG signals through genetic optimized wavelet threshold filtering. 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Virtual Environ. Meas. Syst. Appl. CIVEMSA 2015, no. 61171088, pp. 0–5, 2015.

  17. Sifuzzaman, M., Islam, M. R., and Ali, M. Z., Application of wavelet transform and its advantages compared to Fourier transform. J. Phys. Sci. 13:121–134, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, Y., Liang, F., Zhang, G., and Xu, H., Image intelligent detection based on the Gabor wavelet and the neural network. Symmetry (Basel). 8(11):130, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Valens, C., A really friendly guide to wavelets, 1999.

  20. Donoho, D. L., and Johnstone, I. M., Minimax estimation via wavelet shrinkage. Ann. Stat. 26(3):879–921, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sardy, S., Minimax threshold for denoising complex signals with waveshrink. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 48(4):1023–1028, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Selvakumarasamy, K., Chandra, S. P., and Amutha, R., A comparative analysis of various wavelet shrinkage functions for ECG signals. In Proceeding of the IEEE Int. Con. on Green Computing, Communication and Electrical Engineering, ICGCCEE 2014, 2014.

  23. Donoho, D. L., and Johnstone, I. M., Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81:425–455, 1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Poornachandra, S., and Kumaravel, N., Statistical estimation for hyper shrinkage. Digital Signal Processing 17(2):485–494, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hima Bindu, C., Performance analysis of denoising of ECG signals in time and frequency domain. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology 81–95, 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Selvakumarasamy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This paper has not communicated anywhere till this moment, now only it is communicated to your esteemed journal for the publication with the knowledge of all co-authors.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selvakumarasamy, K., Poornachandra, S. & Amutha, R. K – Shrinkage Function for ECG Signal Denoising. J Med Syst 43, 248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1375-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1375-5

Keywords

Navigation