Two recent, high-impact publications of pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trials highlight the risks of normal saline administration in hospitalized patients [1, 2]. For clinical informaticians and clinical trialists, they raise larger questions about how clinical trials should be conducted in the future.
Randomized, prospective, clinical trials have long been considered a gold standard for assessing causality in the medical literature. There are significant limitations to traditional clinical trials, such as high cost, delays in obtaining funding, large numbers of exclusion criteria, and inability to randomize and intervene in a timely manner in instances of delayed consent. By focusing interventions on highly-selected patients undergoing care delivered by expert clinicians, they may suffer from limited generalizability [3]. Given these long-standing concerns there has been increased interest in recent years in conducting more pragmatic clinical trials, which are designed to specifically address these issues [4,5,6]. Many of the features of pragmatic clinical trials are outlined at length in the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) and PRECIS-2 tools [7, 8].
A major challenge, even in pragmatic clinical trials, has been data collection and validation, including assessment of clinically-relevant clinical outcomes [9]. In the SALT-ED and SMART trials, data were collected and validated through extensive leverage of the electronic health record (EHR)— at significantly decreased cost and effort, compared to comparable studies.
Critical care medicine is practiced in a high-acuity and high-cost environment. Given these factors, proposed interventions and changes to clinical practice are often thoroughly vetted, in many instances in multiple studies, prior to achieving broad clinical implementation. Success stories have included lung protective ventilation, changes in sedation regimens to address intensive care unit delirium, among many others [10,11,12]. Conducting multiple, high-quality prospective, randomized clinical trials, often at multiple centers, may be a technically challenging and expensive process.
As more health systems transition to large, enterprise EHRs, clinical informaticians are presented with the opportunity to leverage tools that can be easily integrated in the EHR to facilitate clinical trials. Multi-center observational data sharing with EHR integration has been successfully performed in numerous fields, including, notably, perioperative outcomes research, via endeavors such as the Multi-Center Perioperative Outcomes Group and the Duke Clinical Research Institute [13,14,15]. These lessons and tools can be embedded within intensive care units, thereby enabling robust, multi-center clinical trials. As the SALT-ED and SMART studies have shown, these trials have the potential to drastically improve clinical practice. We would propose that efforts are urgently needed to create new, multi-center data sharing networks to leverage EHR data to facilitate pragmatic clinical trials in critical care.
References
Semler, M. W., Self, W. H., Wanderer, J. P., Ehrenfeld, J. M., Wang, L., Byrne, D. W., Stollings, J. L., Kumar, A. B., Hughes, C. G., Hernandez, A., Guillamondegui, O. D., May, A. K., Weavind, L., Casey, J. D., Siew, E. D., Shaw, A. D., Bernard, G. R., and Rice, T. W., Investigators S, the Pragmatic Critical Care Research G: Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 378:829–839, 2018.
Self, W. H., Semler, M. W., Wanderer, J. P., Wang, L., Byrne, D. W., Collins, S. P., Slovis, C. M., Lindsell, C. J., Ehrenfeld, J. M., Siew, E. D., Shaw, A. D., Bernard, G. R., Rice, T. W., and Investigators, S.-E., Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Noncritically Ill Adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 378:819–828, 2018.
Schwartz, D., and Lellouch, J., Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J. Chronic Dis. 20:637–648, 1967.
Rosenthal, G. E., The role of pragmatic clinical trials in the evolution of learning health systems. Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 125:204–216, 2014 discussion 217-8.
Activity ALHS, Roundtable on V, Science-Driven Health C, Institute of M, Observational Studies in a Learning Health System: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2013 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved., 2013.
Ford, I., and Norrie, J., Pragmatic Trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 375:454–463, 2016.
Lipman, P. D., Loudon, K., Dluzak, L., Moloney, R., Messner, D., and Stoney, C. M., Framing the conversation: use of PRECIS-2 ratings to advance understanding of pragmatic trial design domains. Trials 18:532, 2017.
Thorpe, K. E., Zwarenstein, M., Oxman, A. D., Treweek, S., Furberg, C. D., Altman, D. G., Tunis, S., Bergel, E., Harvey, I., Magid, D. J., and Chalkidou, K., A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62:464–475, 2009.
Lauer, M. S., Gordon, D., Wei, G., and Pearson, G., Efficient design of clinical trials and epidemiological research: is it possible? Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 14:493–501, 2017.
Sakr, Y., Vincent, J. L., Reinhart, K., Groeneveld, J., Michalopoulos, A., Sprung, C. L., Artigas, A., and Ranieri, V. M., Sepsis Occurence in Acutely Ill Patients I: High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury. Chest 128:3098–3108, 2005.
Pandharipande, P. P., Pun, B. T., Herr, D. L., Maze, M., Girard, T. D., Miller, R. R., Shintani, A. K., Thompson, J. L., Jackson, J. C., Deppen, S. A., Stiles, R. A., Dittus, R. S., Bernard, G. R., and Ely, E. W., Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial. JAMA 298:2644–2653, 2007.
Pandharipande, P. P., Girard, T. D., Jackson, J. C., Morandi, A., Thompson, J. L., Pun, B. T., Brummel, N. E., Hughes, C. G., Vasilevskis, E. E., Shintani, A. K., Moons, K. G., Geevarghese, S. K., Canonico, A., Hopkins, R. O., Bernard, G. R., Dittus, R. S., and Ely, E. W., Investigators B-IS: Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N. Engl. J. Med. 369:1306–1316, 2013.
Freundlich, R. E., and Kheterpal, S., Perioperative effectiveness research using large databases. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 25:489–498, 2011.
Berman, M. F., Iyer, N., Freudzon, L., Wang, S., Freundlich, R. E., Housey, M., and Kheterpal, S., Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Perioperative Clinical Research C: Alarm Limits for Intraoperative Drug Infusions: A Report From the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Anesth. Analg. 125:1203–1211, 2017.
Pencina, M. J., Louzao, D. M., McCourt, B. J., Adams, M. R., Tayyabkhan, R. H., Ronco, P., and Peterson, E. D., Supporting open access to clinical trial data for researchers: The Duke Clinical Research Institute-Bristol-Myers Squibb Supporting Open Access to Researchers Initiative. Am. Heart J. 172:64–69, 2016.
Funding
Dr. Freundlich receives ongoing support from the Vanderbilt Faculty Research Scholars.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freundlich, R.E., Pandharipande, P. & Ehrenfeld, J.M. A Call for Electronic Health Record-based Data Sharing for Clinical Trials in Critical Care. J Med Syst 42, 115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0984-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0984-8