Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore the importance of service need along with perceived technology attributes in potentially influence the acceptance of teleconsultation. The study was conducted based on the concurrent triangulation design involving qualitative and quantitative study methods. These entailed interviews with key informants and questionnaires survey of health care providers who practiced in the participating hospitals in Malaysia. Thematic analysis involving iterative coding was conducted on qualitative data. Scale reliability test and hypothesis testing procedures were performed on quantitative data. Subsequently, both data were merged, compared and interpreted. In particular, this study utilized a qualitative priority such that a superior emphasis was placed on the qualitative method to demonstrate an overall understanding. Based on the responses of 20 key informants, there was a significant need for teleconsultation as a tool to extend health services to patients under constrained resources and critical conditions. Apparently, the latest attributes of teleconsultation technology have generally met users’ expectation but rather perceived as supportive facets in encouraging the usage. Concurrently, based on the survey engaging 72 health care providers, teleconsultation acceptance was statistically proven to be strongly associated with service need and not originated exclusively from the technological attributes. Additionally, the results of this study can be used to promote teleconsultation as an effective means in delivering better health services. Thus, the categories emerged from this study may be further revised and examined for explaining the acceptance of teleconsultation technology in other relevant contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maarop, N., and Win, K. T. A review of telemedicine in developing countries: Introduction and implementation issues. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Asia Pacific Association of Medical Informatics, November 21–24, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 85–92, 2009.
Paul, D. L., Pearlson, K. E., and McDaniel, R. R., Jr., Assessing technological barriers to telemedicine: Technology-management implications. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 46(3):279–88, 1999.
Mohan, J., and Raja-Yaacob, R. R., The Malaysian Telehealth Flagship Application: A national approach to health data protection and utilisation and consumer rights. Int. J. Med. Inform. 73(3):217–227, 2004.
Ministry of Health, Annual Report 2007. Ministry of Health Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2008.
Rigby, M., Impact of telemedicine must be defined in developing countries. BMJ 324:47–8, 2002.
Hjelm, N. M., Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. J. Telemed. Telecare. 11(2):60–70, 2005.
Harno, K. S. R., Telemedicine in managing demand for secondary-care services. J. Telemed. Telecare. 5(3):189–192, 1999.
Aas, I. H. M., A qualitative study of the organizational consequences of telemedicine. J. Telemed. Telecare. 7(1):18–26, 2001.
Roine, R., Ohinmaa, A., and Hailey, D., Assessing telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 165(6):765–771, 2001.
Wootton, R., and Herbert, M., What constitutes success in telehealth. J. Telemed. Telecare. 7(2):3–7, 2001.
Davis, F., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3):319–340, 1989.
Holden, R. J., and Karsh, B.-T., The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(1):159–172, 2010.
Hu, P. J. H., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., and Tam, K. Y., Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 16(2):91–112, 1999.
Hu, P. J.-H., Chau, P. Y. K., and Sheng, O. R. L., Adoption of telemedicine technology by health care organizations: An exploratory study. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 12(3):197–221, 2002.
Chau, P. Y. K., and Hu, P. J., Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18(4):191–229, 2002.
Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovation, 4th edition. Free, New York, 1995.
Al-Qirim, N., Championing telemedicine adoption and utilization in healthcare organizations in New Zealand. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76(1):42–54, 2007.
Yi, M. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., and Probst, J. C., Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Inf. Manag. 43(3):350–363, 2006.
Kraemer, K. L., and King, J. L., Social analysis in MIS: The Irvine School, 1970–1990. In: Nunamaker, J. F. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume 3. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alimitos, CA, 1990.
Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A., Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Method in Social and Behavioural Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 3–50, 2003.
Creswell, J. W., and Plano Clark, V. L., Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007.
Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A., Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2009.
Ministry of Health, Annual Report 2009. Ministry of Health Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2009.
Gilchrist, V. J., and Williams, R. L., Key informant interviews. In: Crabtree, B. F., and Miller, W. L. (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 195–218, 1999.
Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., and Sekaran, U., Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Wiley, Milton, Queensland, 2001.
Merriam, S. B., Basic Interpretive Qualitative Research. In: Merriam, S. B. (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 37–39, 2002.
Morse, J. M., Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs. Res. 40(2):120–123, 1999.
Cronbach, L., Essentials of psychological testing. Harper & Row, New York, 1970.
Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric theory, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
Money, W., and Turner, A. Application of the technology acceptance model to a knowledge management system. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004.
Sun, H., and Zhang, P., The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64(2):53–78, 2006.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
Allen, P., and Bennett, K., SPSS for the health and behavioural sciences. Thomson, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2008.
Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.
Hailey, D., and Crowe, B., A profile of success and failure in telehealth—evidence and opinion from the Successes and Failures in Telehealth conferences. J. Telemed. Telecare. 9(2):22–24, 2003.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank the Director General of Health Malaysia, MOH hospitals and Telehealth Division of MOH Malaysia for their valuable cooperation.
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest in the sense of the requirements for the manuscript and publication of the findings.
Funding
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maarop, N., Win, K.T. Understanding the Need of Health Care Providers for Teleconsultation and Technological Attributes in Relation to The Acceptance of Teleconsultation in Malaysia: A Mixed Methods Study. J Med Syst 36, 2881–2892 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9766-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9766-2