Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison between the Psychological Benefits of Giving Money vs. Giving Time

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four studies investigated the differential effects of giving time vs. giving money on well-being and related mechanisms. Studies 1 and 2 used a recall paradigm, Study3 was a laboratory experiment, and Study 4 combined daily surveys with a recall procedure. Across the studies, we failed to find any substantial difference in happiness or meaningfulness associated with the two types of prosocial behaviors, which was probably due to insufficient statistical power. Yet, we found that individuals tended to recall experiences of giving time (vs. money) that were associated with higher satisfaction of the needs for relatedness and competence. Moreover, for both types of prosocial behaviors, the fulfillment of the three basic needs in SDT, autonomy, competence, and relatedness, as well as beneficence (i.e., perceived prosocial impact), all acted as important predictors of happiness and meaningfulness. Implications for research on the psychological consequences of prosocial behaviors, and the roles of basic needs and beneficence in promoting well-being are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Studies 1 and 3, we also measured positive affect (with the five items, happy, excited, enjoyed, content and pride), negative affect (with the five items, depressed, angry, sad, anxious, frustrated), general life satisfaction (with the satisfaction with life scale, Pavot et al. 1991) and meaning in life (with the 5-item presence of meaning subscale of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, Steger et al. 2006). No significant difference was found in terms of all these variables in both studies. Therefore, we chose not to include these variables in the main text.

  2. To make a more direct comparison with the results from Study 1, we compared the outcome variables associated with giving money in the money-first group and those associated with giving time in the time-first group (because these data were not contaminated by carry-over effect). The results indicated that consistent with Study 1, giving time fostered more relatedness (M = 4.64, SD = 1.40 vs. M = 4.05, SD = 1.50, t(96) = 2.12, p = .046) and competence (M = 4.73, SD = 1.17 vs. M = 4.14, SD = 1.32, t(96) = 2.35, p = .021) than giving money. All other comparisons were non-significant, ts(96) < 1.39, ps > .17.

References

Download references

Funding

This research is supported by Grant from the National Social Science Foundation of China allocated to the first author (Gant No. 19BSH129). The authors thank Ms. Beibei Zhuo for her assistance in material preparation and data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and within the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Zhu, J., Wei, L. et al. A Comparison between the Psychological Benefits of Giving Money vs. Giving Time. J Happiness Stud 22, 2677–2701 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00336-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00336-3

Keywords

Navigation