Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ambition or Jealousy? It Depends on Whom you are Compared with

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using panel data from a nationally representative survey in China, this paper simultaneously examines the impact of relative status of reference points from various categories on individual happiness. We find strong evidence supporting asymmetric and adaptation effects in internal comparisons. The marginal effect of current absolute status decreases as achieved relative status rises, and future (positive) status changes matter more than current (negative) status changes, respectively. With respect to external comparisons, the results suggest that relative status of both spatial and predicted reference groups exerts a favorable influence on happiness, whereas those of social reference groups substantially decrease individual happiness. This result remains qualitatively unchanged even correcting for the possible endogeneity of the current absolute status and reference relative status. The two opposite effects are magnified when people are temporarily unemployed or experience high volatility of economic status. A series of further sensitivity tests are consistent with our tunnel and comparison effects conjecture but rule out some alternative explanations, despite suggestive rather than conclusive. Finally, the findings also survive a large set of robustness checks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antinyan, A. (2016). Reference group income and subjective well-being: Empirical evidence from low-income transition economies. Social Indicators Research, 127(3), 1333–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadullah, M. N., Xiao, S., & Yeoh, E. (2018). Subjective well-being in China, 2005–2010: The role of relative income, gender, and location. China Economic Review, 48, 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, M., & Fors Connolly, F. (2019). The association between life satisfaction and affective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 73, 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, A., & Flèche, S. (2019). Neighbors’ income, public goods, and well-being. Review of Income and Wealth, 65(2), 217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Gray, D., & Roberts, J. (2015). The relative income hypothesis: A comparison of methods. Economics Letters, 130, 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Gray, D. (2016). Household finances and well-being in Australia: An empirical analysis of comparison effects. Journal of Economic Psychology, 53, 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, M. (2019). Top incomes and subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 73, 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Kosec, K., & Mueller, V. (2019). Moving to despair? Migration and well-being in Pakistan. World Development, 113, 186–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E. (1999). Are wages habit-forming? Evidence from micro data. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39(2), 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Andrew, J. O. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. The Economic Journal, 120(544), 573–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • D Ambrosio, C., Jäntti, M., & Lepinteur, A. (2019). Money and happiness: Income, wealth and subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 145(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., Haisken-De New, J., & MacCulloch, R. (2010). Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76(3), 834–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diriwaechter, P., & Shvartsman, E. (2018). The anticipation and adaptation effects of intra- and interpersonal wage changes on job satisfaction. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 146, 116–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drichoutis, A. C., Nayga, R. M., & Lazaridis, P. (2010). Do reference values matter? Some notes and extensions on “income and happiness across Europe”. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(4), 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(1), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 22463–22468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A., & Knell, M. (2004). Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous goals and reference standards. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 417–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 997–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh, G., & Schroeder, M. B. (2009). Does your neighbor’s income affect your happiness? American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 805–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerke, L., & Pannenberg, M. (2015). Direct evidence for income comparisons and subjective well-being across reference groups. Economics Letters, 137, 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 71(1), 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O., & Rothschild, M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Wu, S., & Deng, S. (2016). Relative income, relative assets, and happiness in urban China. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 971–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G. G., & Knight, J. (2007). Community, comparisons and subjective well-being in a divided society. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knies, G. (2012). Income comparisons among neighbours and satisfaction in east and west Germany. Social Indicators Research, 106(3), 471–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J., Song, L., & Gunatilaka, R. (2009). Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Economic Review, 20(4), 635–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2011). Does economic growth raise happiness in China? Oxford Development Studies, 39(01), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2012). Income, aspirations and the hedonic treadmill in a poor society. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(1), 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristoffersen, I. (2018). Great expectations: Education and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 66, 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzakis, E., & Moro, M. (2009). The poor, the rich and the happy: Exploring the link between income and subjective well-being. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(1), 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshio, T., Nozaki, K., & Kobayashi, M. (2011). Relative income and happiness in Asia: Evidence from nationwide surveys in China, Japan, and Korea. Social Indicators Research, 104(3), 351–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshio, T., Nozaki, K., & Kobayashi, M. (2013). Division of household labor and marital satisfaction in China, Japan, and Korea. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34(2), 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327(5965), 576–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otis, N. (2017). Subjective well-being in China: Associations with absolute, relative, and perceived economic circumstances. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 885–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S., & Guilbert, D. (2013). Income–happiness paradox in Australia: Testing the theories of adaptation and social comparison. Economic Modelling, 30, 900–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posel, D. R., & Casale, D. M. (2011). Relative standing and subjective well-being in South Africa: The role of perceptions, expectations and income mobility. Social Indicators Research, 104(2), 195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senik, C. (2004). When information dominates comparison. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2099–2123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senik, C. (2008). Ambition and jealousy: Income interactions in the ‘Old’ Europe versus the ‘New’ Europe and the United States. Economica, 75(299), 495–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifa, M., & Leibbrandt, M. (2018). Relative economic position and subjective well-being in a poor society: Does relative position indicator matter? Social Indicators Research, 139(2), 611–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, H. (2014). What affects happiness: Absolute income, relative income or expected income? Journal of Policy Modeling, 36(6), 994–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsurumi, T., Imauji, A., & Managi, S. (2019). Relative income, community attachment and subjective well–being: Evidence from Japan. Kyklos, 72(1), 152–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2015). Income comparison, income formation, and subjective well-being: New evidence on envy versus signaling. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 59, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China

    Zhijian Zhang & Xueyuan Wang

Authors
  1. Zhijian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xueyuan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xueyuan Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 9, 10, 11, 12, 13.

Table 9 The contrast effects of nonsocial and social reference points in rural areas in China, 2012–2016
Full size table
Table 10 The first-stage regression of expected relative status on reference relative status in China, 2012–2016
Full size table
Table 11 Estimates of alternative subjective well-being measures on different external reference groups in China, 2012–2016
Full size table
Table 12 Estimates of happiness on different reference relative income in China, 2012–2016
Full size table
Table 13 Ruling out self-selection into particular reference groups in China, 2012–2016
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Wang, X. Ambition or Jealousy? It Depends on Whom you are Compared with. J Happiness Stud 22, 1189–1215 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00269-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00269-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation