Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrative Well-Being Leads Our Attentional System: An Eye-Tracking Study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both hedonic and eudemonic components of well-being have been related to different variables such as mental and physical health, or social and economic factors. However, and despite the growing interest in the study of well-being, there is scarce evidence on the role that these components play in high cognitive processes such as attentional deployment towards emotional information. The aim of the present study is to disentangle the relation between current affect (state hedonic well-being), integrative well-being (i.e. hedonic, eudaimonic and social well-being), and attentional biases towards emotional information. Participants (N = 119) performed and eye-tracking task where they were asked to freely watch a series of 108 pairs of faces depicting happy, sad or neutral expressions in three types of conditions (i.e. happy vs. neutral, sad vs. neutral, and happy vs. sad faces). Results showed that both current affect and integrative well-being were associated with a maintenance attentional bias towards positive information (i.e. happy faces). Further, using bootstrapping mediation analysis, we found that the relation observed between current affect and positive maintenance attentional biases was totally mediated by integrative well-being levels. We discuss the relevance of the present results in the incipient research on cognitive and emotional processes and well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the section below, we only report the mediational model for the Happy vs. Sad condition as the same results were found for the Happy vs. Neutral condition (see supplementary material for the mediational models for Happy vs. Neutral condition).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by MINECO PSI2014-61764 (EXPLORA), PSI2014-56303-REDT, PSI2015-69253-R and BES-2013-064936 grants. We also thank Prof. Almudena Duque, Teodoro Pascual, Natalia Poyato, Pablo Roca, Ines Nieto and Teresa Boemo and Agustin Hayes for their collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Blanco.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

This project has been approved by the School of Psychology Ethics Committee of Complutense University on December 2, 2014 (the Ethical Committee does not assign reference numbers).

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent before starting the study. To ensure anonymity, we replaced the names of participants with code numbers to process and analyze the data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blanco, I., Vazquez, C. Integrative Well-Being Leads Our Attentional System: An Eye-Tracking Study. J Happiness Stud 22, 787–801 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00251-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00251-7

Keywords

Navigation