Abstract
Our understanding of well-being has benefited from cross-cultural and non-Western research. However, culturally unique well-being concepts remain largely under-theorized. To address this gap, our research was aimed at developing and validating a substantive theory of how Japanese university students pursue ikigai or life worth living. To this end, we conducted sequential mixed-methods research. First, we performed a qualitative study guided by grounded theory methodology based on photo-elicitation interview data from 27 Japanese university students. Second, we tested our emerging theory of ikigai with online survey data from 672 Japanese university students by using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Our results indicate that students made four distinct actions to pursue ikigai. First, they engaged in an experience they subjectively valued as enjoyable, effortful, stimulating, or comforting. Second, they “diversified” by engaging with multiple values (e.g., enjoyment and comfort) within or across experiences. Third, they balanced competing values (i.e., enjoyment vs. effort, and stimulation vs. comfort). Fourth, they temporarily disengaged from experiences that became overwhelming so they could re-engage with them at a later time. These actions were perceived to result in daily lives being worth living and full of vibrancy. Students also believed these actions were conditioned by understanding what value was important in a certain life condition, and by their ability to act on opportunities for potentially valuable experiences without hesitation. The hypothesized relationships among the above concepts were supported by the subsequent quantitative results. Our findings are discussed in light of the ikigai and eudaimonic well-being literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Blindfolding is a type of resampling statistical method. Based on a pre-determined distance number D, resampling extracts only every Dth case from the original sample and creates separate pseudo-samples. We used D = 9 for N = 672.
References
Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. (1994). Kokumin-seikatsu-ni-kansuru-yoron-chyousa. Retrieved from http://survey.gov-online.go.jp/h06/H06-05-06-01.html. Accessed 12 Feb 2019.
Central Research Services, Inc. (2012). “Ikigai”-ni-kansuru-yoron-chyousa. Retrieved from http://www.crs.or.jp/backno/No636/6362.htm. Accessed 12 Feb 2019.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin,112(1), 155–159.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research,100, 185–207.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49(1), 71–75.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Age differences in the Big Five across the life span: Evidence from two national samples. Psychology and Aging,23(3), 558–566.
Dunn, J. G. H., Bouffard, M., & Rogers, W. T. (1999). Assessing item content-relevance in sport psychology scale-construction research: Issues and recommendations. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,3(1), 15–36.
George, L. S., & Park, C. L. (2017). The multidimensional existential meaning scale: A tripartite approach to measuring meaning in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology,12(6), 613–627.
González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Sierra, A. C., Ferriz, R., & Hagger, M. S. (2016). Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory. Personality and Individual Differences,102, 159–169.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality,37, 504–528.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hasegawa, A., Iimori, H., Hoshi, T., & Kawamura, N. (2007). Construction of ikigai objects scales: Measuring ikigai objects and type of ikigai. Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine,11, 5–10.
Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies,15, 1425–1456.
Kamiya, M. (1966). Ikigai-ni-tsuite. Tokyo: Misuzu Shyobou.
King, L. A., Heintzelman, S. J., & Ward, S. J. (2016). Beyond the search for meaning: A contemporary science of the experience of meaning in life. Current Directions in Psychological Science,25(4), 211–216.
Knoop, H. H., & Delle Fave, A. (Eds.). (2013). Well-being and cultures: Perspectives from positive psychology. New York: Springer.
Kondo, T. (2003). Koureishya-no-ikigaikan-sokutei-ni-okeru-serufu/ankaringu-sukeeru-no-yuukousei. Rounen Seishinigai Zasshi,14(3), 339–344.
Kondo, T., & Kamata, J. (1998). Gendai-daigakusei-no-ikigai-kan-to-sukeeru-sakusei. The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology,11(1), 73–82.
Kono, S., Walker, G. J., Ito, E., & Hagi, Y. (2017). Theorizing leisure’s roles in the pursuit of ikigai (life worthiness): A mixed-methods approach. Leisure Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2017.1356255.
Kumano, M. (2006). Ikigai-to-sono-ruiji-gainen-no-kouzou. The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology,19(1), 56–66.
Kumano, M. (2012). Ikigai-keisei-no-shinrigaku. Tokyo: Kazama Shyobou.
Kumano, M. (2013). Ikigai-keisei-moderu-no-sokutei-shyakudo-no-sakusei: Ikigai-purosesu-shyakudo-to-ikigai-jyoutai-shyakudo. The Bulletin of Education,39, 1–11.
Kumano, M. (2018). On the concept of well-being in Japan: Feeling shiawase as hedonic well-being and feeling ikigai as eudaimonic well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life,13(2), 419–433.
Lomas, T. (2016). Towards a positive cross-cultural lexicography: Enriching our emotional landscape through 216 ‘untranslatable’ words pertaining to well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology,11(5), 546–558.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly,35(2), 293–334.
Martela, F., Ryan, R. M., & Steger, M. F. (2018). Meaningfulness as satisfaction of autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: Comparing the four satisfactions and positive affect as predictors of meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies,19(5), 1261–1282.
Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology,11(5), 531–545.
Mathews, G. (1996). What makes life worth living? How Japanese and Americans make sense of their worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Nishizako, K., & Sakagami, C. (2004). Kagoshima-ni-okeru-jyakunen-sou-no-seikatsu-bunka-chyousa (dai-2-hou): Daigakusei-no-seikatsu-jyoukyou-to-bunka-ni-kansuru-ishiki-to-jittai-chyousa. Kagoshima Kenritsu Tanki Daigaku Chiiki Kenkyuujyo Kenkyuu Nenpou,35, 39–83.
Oishi, S. (2009). Shiawase-wo-kagaku-suru: Shinrigaku-kara-wakatta-koto. Tokyo: Shinyoushya.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2013). Happiness experienced: The science of subjective well-being. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 134–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peng, K., Spencer-Rodgers, J., & Nian, Z. (2006). Naïve dialecticism and the Tao of Chinese thought. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 247–261). New York: Springer.
Peterson, C. (2008). The good life: Positive psychology and what makes life worth living. Psychology Today. Retrieved from http://archive.is/m4m1J#selection-1171.0-1171.307. Accessed 12 Feb 2019.
Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. M. (1997). On energy, personality and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality,65(3), 529–565.
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies,9, 139–170.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research,69(10), 3998–4010.
Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: Reexamining methods and meanings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73(3), 549–559.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Sheldon, K. M., & Niemiec, C. P. (2006). It’s not just the amount that counts: Balanced need satisfaction also affects well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,91(2), 331–341.
Shimai, S., Otake, K., Utsuki, N., Ikemi, A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2004). Development of a Japanese version of the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS), and examination of its validity and reliability. Nihon Koueishi,51(10), 845–853.
Tinkler, P. (2013). Using photographs in social and historical research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tsai, J. L. (2007). Ideal affect: Cultural causes and behavioral consequences. Perspectives on Psychological Science,2(3), 242–259.
Acknowledgements
This paper was partially supported by a Sasakawa Sports Research Grant (160A3-011) from the Sasakawa Sports Foundation (Japan). We would like to thank Drs. Yumiko Hagi and Eiji Ito, who helped with data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kono, S., Walker, G.J. Theorizing Ikigai or Life Worth Living Among Japanese University Students: A Mixed-Methods Approach. J Happiness Stud 21, 327–355 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00086-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00086-x