Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Appreciation of Beauty and Excellence: Relationship with Personality, Prosociality and Well-Being

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Appreciation of beauty and excellence (ABE) is one of the least studied character strengths. Therefore, this study aims at advancing the knowledge in this area by (1) developing a scale that measures the three categories of appreciation (i.e., beauty, moral excellence, and non-moral excellence), (2) assessing many of its psychometric properties, and (3) examining the relationship of ABE with personality, prosociality, and well-being. In Study 1, we create and assess an initial set of items measuring ABE. In Study 2, we examine the dimensionality of ABE, and test the internal consistency and validity of the scale. Moreover, we assess the relationships between ABE and personality, prosociality and well-being. In Study 3, we test the temporal stability of the scale. Results revealed that a three-dimensional model of ABE showed the best fit to the data. The scale showed good validity (construct, factorial, incremental) and reliability (internal and temporal). Finally, ABE yielded positive associations with prosociality and well-being, and demonstrated to be more than a linear combination of the Big Five factors of personality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although the goal was to select fewer items for the final scale, we wanted to test again these 15 items in an independent sample before deciding which items to retain.

  2. Parallel analysis suggested retaining one factor. However, as we were especially driven by the theory and this study represents a first step, we did not want to exclude the possibility of the three-factor model, provided that Study 2 yielded good fit indices. Therefore, we decided to keep the theoretical three-dimensional model, and test the factor structure again with confirmatory factor analysis in a larger sample (Study 2).

  3. Instructions available upon request.

  4. Univariate and multivariate normality were fulfilled. A CFA with polychoric correlations yielded similar results.

  5. Both the Purpose in Life Test (Crumbaugh and Maholick 1964) and the Social Desirability Scale (Crowne and Marlowe 1960) were parceled following Little et al. (2002) recommendations to obtain an adequate number of observable variables in the CFA. After testing both constructs’ unidimensionality, three parcels were created in each measure using the item-to-construct-balance method.

References

  • Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avia, M. D. (1994). NEO PI-R inventario de personalidad NEO revisado (NEO PI-R). Forma S. Paul T. Costa y Robert R. McCrae (1992). Versión en español de M.D. Avia. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Avia, M. D., Silva, F., & Sanz, J. (1997–2000). NEO-FFI. Inventario de cinco factores NEO (Costa y McCrae, 1989/98). Adaptación española. Edición experimental de 19972000. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Bayer, R. (1961). Historia de la estética. Fondo de cultura económica de España, S.L.

  • Bostic, T. J., McGartland, D., & Hood, M. (2000). A validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling. Social Indicators Research, 52(3), 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, F. (2006). Cinco meditaciones sobre la belleza. España: Siruela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. B., Gruber, J., & Keltner, D. (2010). Comparing spiritual transformations and experiences of profound beauty. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2(3), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEOFFI) professional manual. Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 200–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dambrun, M., Ricard, M., Després, G., Drelon, E., Gibelin, E., Gibelin, M., et al. (2012). Measuring happiness: From fluctuating happiness to authentic–durable happiness. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(16), 1–11.

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C., et al. (2006). Adaptación española de las escalas de bienestar psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema, 18(3), 572–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diessner, R., Solom, R. C., Frost, N. K., Parsons, L., & Davidson, J. (2008). Engagement with beauty: Appreciating natural, artistic, and moral beauty. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142(3), 303–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (2004). Historia de la belleza. Barcelona: Lumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrando, P. J., & Chico, E. (2000). Adaptación y análisis psicométrico de la escala de deseabilidad social de Marlowe y Crowne. Psicothema, 12(3), 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2008). Psychometrics: An introduction. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (1977). La actualidad de lo bello: El arte como juego, símbolo y fiesta. Barcelona: Paidos Ibérica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güsewell, A., & Ruch, W. (2012). Are there multiple channels through which we connect with beauty and excellence? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(6), 516–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Zotes, J. A., Bayón, C., Montserrat, C., Valero, J., Labad, A., Cloninger, C. R., et al. (2004). Inventario del Temperamento y el Carácter-Revisado (TCI-R). Baremación y datos normativos en una muestra de población general. Actas Españolas De Psiquiatría, 32(1), 8–15.

  • Haidt, J., & Keltner, D. (2004). Appreciation of beauty and excellence [awe, wonder, elevation]. In C. Peterson & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (pp. 537–551). Washington, New York: American Psychological Association and Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1764/2008). Observaciones sobre el sentimiento de lo bello y lo sublime. España: Alianza Editorial.

  • Kjell, O. N. E. (2011). Sustainable well-being: A potential synergy between sustainability and well-being research. Review of General Psychology, 15(3), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of General Psychology, 10(4), 302–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, S. K., Sherman, M. F., Piedmont, R. L., Kirkhart, M. W., Rapp, E. M., & Bike, D. H. (2009). The relation between elevation and self-reported prosocial behavior: Incremental validity over the five-factor model of personality. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littman-Ovadia, H., & Lavy, S. (2012). Character strengths in Israel: Hebrew adaptation of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noblejas de la Flor, M. A. (1994). Logoterapia. Fundamentos, principios y aplicación. Una experiencia de evaluación del “logro interior de sentido” (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España.

  • Pérez, E., & Medrano, L. (2010). Análisis factorial exploratorio: Bases conceptuales y metodológicas. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Albéniz, A., de Paúl, J., Etxeberría, J., Montes, M. P., & Torres, E. (2003). Adaptación del Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al español. Psicothema, 15(2), 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., Pole, N., D’Andrea, W., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2008). Strengths of character and posttraumatic growth. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21(2), 214–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, New York: American Psychological Association, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful ageing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12(1), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2006). Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment style. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & Mossman, A. (2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emotion, 21(5), 944–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. H., Parrott, W. G., Diener, E. F., Hoyle, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (1999). Dispositional envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 1007–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., Hicks, B. M., Kashdan, T. B., Krueger, R. F., & Bouchard, T. J. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on the positive traits of the values in action classification, and biometric covariance with normal personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 524–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez, C., Duque, A., & Hervás, G. (2013). Satisfaction with life scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: Validation and normative data. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 608–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Luisa Martínez-Martí.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-Martí, M.L., Hernández-Lloreda, M.J. & Avia, M.D. Appreciation of Beauty and Excellence: Relationship with Personality, Prosociality and Well-Being. J Happiness Stud 17, 2613–2634 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9709-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9709-6

Keywords

Navigation